Hi,
Il Sabato 18 Giugno 2016 21:45, Frank Stähr <der-storch...@gmx.net> ha scritto: >I think we are nearly ready, don’t give up. I *never* give up :) >Nevertheless, I don’t see why e. g. boost/algorithm/string/trim.hpp is >guaranteed to be installed. It might be a coincidence that it is >included by regex or program-options. In my case e. g. libboost1.58-dev >was automatically installed together with regex/program-options. >(But you do not need to explain. I just wanted to exclude an error.) you gave me a good answer here, so, please add it again then (libboost-dev is fine in this case!) grep boost . -R |grep include ./src/main.cpp:#include <boost/program_options.hpp> ./src/main.cpp:#include <boost/algorithm/string/trim.hpp> ./src/main.cpp:#include <boost/algorithm/string/case_conv.hpp> ./src/main.cpp:#include <boost/algorithm/string/predicate.hpp> ./src/main.cpp:#include <boost/regex.hpp> seems also available in boost1.60 >There is a good reason, but I see that it is unnecessarily tortuous to >do so. That’s why everything under GPL-2+ now. if you provide an explanation I can accept it, this is not about you being wrong and me being right, it is about discussion and accept a common point of view :) as I did above, I accepted your explanation and asked to restore your solution >Really? ><www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/dreq.en.html#copyright> says, >common licenses may just be refered. we are talking about copyright in upstream tarball. I can understand a symlink in debian/copyright, but shouldn't the upstream tarball have a LICENSE file explaining the license text? https://ftp-master.debian.org/REJECT-FAQ.html >Thx for all the work and your patience, thanks for the followup :) I guess we are mostly ready now! G.
