s a tk package.
> comments
> in manpage, debian/delme, patches/manpages -> upstream, ubuntu
> patches, deletable files: stk-4.3.0.tar.gz.cdbs-config_list
>
--
Felipe Sateler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
deleted files.
--
Felipe Sateler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sable-rpath option, even when they don't advertise it
in ./configure --help. I don't see any such macro in the sources here in my
computer.
--
Felipe Sateler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ng the documentation, but not for why it must be in postinst. Can't
you use (at build time) the just built yorick to generate the docs, and
then distribute them as a separate package? There may be people who don't
want the documentation installed.
--
Felipe Sateler
--
To UNSUBSCR
a while you get to know people, and then the process makes itself
easier: you are no longer asking questions in the wild, but rather to a
person you know, which makes a _huge_ difference in response.
--
Felipe Sateler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
version of the package that
> Build-Depends on the parser-generator is uploaded.
There is no automatic infrastructure to build all packages. What could
happen is that the release team could trigger a rebuild (binNMUs) of all
the Build-Dependent packages if need be, but they have to be notified of
the
ated?
After all, users wouldn't want most of it, and developers can install what
they need to do their development (you don't see a C++-dev-all package that
depends on all c++ libraries ;).
--
Felipe Sateler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
es which can be unstripped
afterwards (eg, via dh_strip) to avoid patching upstream's makefiles or having
to pass special arguments to gcc via make variables.
Also, it eases the implementation of nostrip (for free if you use dh_strip) and
the generation of -dbg packages (dh_strip manages
libdir and/or --datarootdir to configure to force a behaviour?
--
Felipe Sateler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
?
>
> Yes, certainly fixing any bug (even one not yet reported) is enough
> justification for making a new release.
No. The cost of wasting buildd and user time has to be factored in. Not any
bug is worth of making a new release for.
--
Felipe Sateler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-
_0.4-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Felipe Sateler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
.2~rc3~dfsg1, and then
you bump to 2.2~rc3+hg123~dfsg1.
I think you should use 2.2~rc3.hg123~dfsg1 for now, and when 2.2 is released
you go to 2.2.0~dfsg1 (the .0 is needed because dfsg sorts before rc3).
--
Felipe Sateler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Ludovico Cavedon wrote:
> On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Ludovico Cavedon
> wrote:
>> On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Magnus Holmgren
>> wrote:
>>> On lördagen den 16 maj 2009, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>>> When adding a dfsg or whatever suffix, always us
l-style none' for
> all sessions, or just unload the 'pcspkr' module
>
> Then believe that it should remain open?
Maybe the user wants the beep for some other reason, but doesn't want scrot
to beep. It is still a valid request, I think.
--
Felipe Sateler
Python and Lua bindings. It uses scons,
however.
What package is this?
--
Felipe Sateler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
(please don't cc me)
Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> 2009/5/22 Felipe Sateler :
>> Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>>
>>> I'm maintaining a C++ library. They have SWIG (python) and Java (dunno
>>> how) bindings which are not packaged right now.
>>>
>>
ontrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qutecsound/qutecsound_0.4-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Felipe Sateler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe&quo
>
If ParaViewConfig requires the build tree to successfully report the
parameters to cmake, then it is broken. Such modules should require an
_installed_ package, not a build tree.
--
Felipe Sateler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
d)
Note that the --no-undefined flag can break builds if you have plugins that
expect to use symbols from the binary they are loaded from.
--
Felipe Sateler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
ecsound/qutecsound_0.4-1.dsc
>
>I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Ping? This application is very important for csound users, because it provides
a great frontend for it.
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
El sábado 13 de junio, LI Daobing escribió:
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 16:15, LI Daobing wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 11:58, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> >>>This package has been updated, it now set
El domingo 14 de junio, LI Daobing escribió:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 11:37, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> > El sábado 13 de junio, LI Daobing escribió:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 16:15, LI Daobing wrote:
> >> > Hell
El lunes 15 de junio, LI Daobing escribió:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 14:29, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> > El domingo 14 de junio, LI Daobing escribió:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 11:37, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> >> > El
Ben Finney wrote:
> Howdy mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new release 0.4.3-2.2 of my package
> ‘burn’ in Lenny.
I believe packages with updates to stable debian releases are versioned
-+lenny1 or something like that.
--
Felipe Sateler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Ben Finney wrote:
>
>> Howdy mentors,
>>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for the new release 0.4.3-2.2 of my package
>> ‘burn’ in Lenny.
>
> I believe packages with updates to stable debian releases are versioned
> -+lenny1 or someth
Ben Finney wrote:
> Felipe Sateler writes:
>
>> I believe packages with updates to stable debian releases are versioned
>> -+lenny1 or something like that.
>
> Felipe Sateler writes:
>
>> BTW, I know this is not a hard requirement, but it is to easily de
> but I suppose that that's not really allowed (is it?).
>
> I just read the policy, but this wasn't addressed there.
I don't think there is a general way to do this, but for your particular
case (restricting to linux), you can use Architecture: linux-any
I don't re
w software. Can you upload it for me?
In general, we of course care for new multimedia packages. However we cannot
sponsor packages on a regular basis. Please see DebianMentorsNet for a
service aiming at this.
--
Felipe Sateler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.de
* is almost always the wrong choice, otherwise it will cross-build
incorrectly.
--
Felipe Sateler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Laurent Guignard wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Sep 2009 00:05:55 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> Sven Joachim wrote:
>>
>> > On 2009-09-07 12:54 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> >
>> >> How about DEB_HOST_ARCH_BITS? This needs dpkg 1.15.4, though.
>> >
option
is to create a virtual machine with qemu or VirtualBox.
--
Felipe Sateler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
build system if
needed. Removing the libraries is not needed, you may want to do it anyways
as a service to others.
If some dependencies are not packaged yet, you should package them
separately before and then package the software you want.
--
Felipe Sateler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de
port zynjacku as zynjacku
> > --
>
> So someone's using a single file as both a library and a stand-alone
> program. Damned silly idea. Stick zynjacku.py in a proper library path
> somewhere, and write a little shim wrapper to stick in /usr/bin that calls
> zynjacku
to install libfoo0 and libfoo1 at the same time (you need
appropriate conflicts and replaces), thus defeating the purpose of ABI
versioning in the package name.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "
tely disturbs me very much.
I've always assumed that malloc (and thus realloc) can sleep. Why is it
so important to not sleep?
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Is there a way to do that without going insane? Some sort of wildcards
or shortcuts to the mangled symbols would be great (specially since it
seems the mangling is different on different archs).
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
the point of a hijacking. The
maintainer has been unresponsive for half a year according to Michael,
so it is perfectly reasonable to attempt a hijack (even if it was not
correctly done).
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 17:31 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> I have a source package that has pdf documentation, which is generated
> with openoffice.org. Is it possible to generate said pdf without user
> interacion (that is, for autobuilding in the buildds)? Or maybe I can
> just s
ight’,
> even if it doesn't appear in the binary package?
ftpmasters seem to be requiring everything in the source to be
documented in debian/copyright (really annoying, I know). If the library
copied is large enough, it might be easier to repack instead of
documenting it. Specially
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 12:05 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Oct 2009, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> > ftpmasters seem to be requiring everything in the source to be
> > documented in debian/copyright (really annoying, I know).
>
> This is because we don't only distri
-
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 19:14 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 20:38 +0100, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> > Dear mentors,
> >
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "algoscore".
>
> Some comments, I'm no DD so I can't up
unch of unneeded links. You should try building with
--as-needed.
* The version should probably be prefixed with 0.0 or something in case
upstream wants to change versioning scheme in the future.
* The examples should be under /usr/share/doc/algoscore,
not /usr/share/algoscore. The same for the
that includes a reST remplate
for manpages would be good.
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
10.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 09:21:44PM -0300, Felipe Sateler a écrit :
The upload would fix these bugs: 552860, 556725
Dear Felipe,
I have uploaded the package.
Thanks!
By the way, have you considered appliying as a DM
to upload it independantly? Judging by your
table) home directory, so ccache fails. Drop the ccache stuff, or
if it _absolutely_ necessary, setup a bogus $HOME so that ccache can
work in the buildds.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
because no DD is currently available in the team :(.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 03:17 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Felipe Sateler (26/11/2009):
> > Your package build-depends on ccache, and it actively enforces it in
> > the debian/rules file. Why is that?
> >
> > I would be willing to bet money that the problem i
tango4 version will be ${binary:Version}
(something like 7.1.1-1), not 4.0.3-1.
Unless you are doing something _really_ weird and changing the version
per-binary?
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
OOps, I didn't reply to list either :p
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 15:16 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> (please reply to list)
>
> On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 18:41 +0100, PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > > You want the debian package version,
k
> other?
>
> Max (in CC) and I had a discussion about that and could not agree :)
Ask upstream to submit the zsh completion to zsh. And in the meanwhile,
install it globally for all zsh users. If there are problems, they will
be reported, and you can forward them to upstream.
--
Saludo
On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 22:34 +0100, Ludovico Cavedon wrote:
> Felipe Sateler wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 00:03 +0100, Ludovico Cavedon wrote:
> >> Upstream for tortoisehg (interface for mercurial) distributes in their
> >> tarball a file:
> >>contrib/_hg
dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/checkinstall/checkinstall_1.6.2-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2009/11/msg00351.html
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-me
On 15/04/10 17:16, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 04:28:13PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.6.2-1
of my package "checkinstall". As per the comments
of Charles Plessy[1], I have set the DM-Upload-Allowed
field
On 17/04/10 04:43, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:48:55AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 15/04/10 17:16, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 04:28:13PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.6.2-1
of my package
On 18/04/10 23:14, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:16:25PM +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm a écrit :
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 04:28:13PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.6.2-1
of my package "checkinstall". As per the c
VCS in use, debian/rules style [dh/cdbs/debhelper]) could be shown
on the PET page. Different sponsors are likely to have different
requirements.
The only problem I see is that PET does not really scale well to lots of
packages, the page gets quite cluttered. So I don't know if pulling the
whole collab
in.
> For now it supports Git and SVN as I use those myself.
>
> It still needs some work, but is slowly getting usable.
Is that available somewhere?
- --
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://e
EB_BUILD_PARALLEL?
- Why are there only static libraries?
... and I'm not quite confident about the license, specially about the
Kyoto District Court venue thing (clause 5).
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[ No need to CC me, I read the list ]
On 13/07/10 19:47, Siegfried-Angel Gevatter Pujals (RainCT) wrote:
> Hi Felipe,
>
> Thank you for taking a look at the Julius package.
No problem.
>
> 2010/7/13 Felipe Sateler :
>> - Why do you modify the manpages via sed ins
that strategy.
What workflows could be used, to avoid a "fork"?
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 03/08/10 17:15, Josue Abarca wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 05:04:20PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I recently developed an interest in Code::Blocks, which is not currently
>> in Debian, and the current ITP has shown no real activity for over a ye
On 03/08/10 19:29, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 05:04:20PM -0400, Felipe Sateler a écrit :
>>
>> If upstream were using git, the solution would be pretty simple, just
>> branch and merge from upstream as required (as done by many packagers in
>> debi
On 03/08/10 20:52, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 07:58:08PM -0400, Felipe Sateler a écrit :
>>
>> that would imply changing the scm tool for the maintainer (which I
>> noted above is not me).
>
> I am confused…
>
> In the upstream Subvers
;1.2+dfsg1"). "+"
> N: sorts before ".", so 1.2 < 1.2+dfsg1 < 1.2.1 as normally desired.
> N:
> N: Severity: minor, Certainty: possible
> N:
And if there are any prospects of upstream cleaning up their tree, the ~
symbol makes it possible to re-release the same tarball without the
offending files.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
s of libraries in Debian which optionally
> leverage proprietary code if it is available?
>
Not exactly a library, but the kernel will load proprietary firmware if
it finds it available and the device in question exists. As long as your
software is useful without said proprietary library, it c
archive using it, it doesn't mean
it can't be built.
>
> In summary, there is a bug already fixed and a bug that may be not a
> bug at all, how to proceed with the adoption?
Fix (or mark as fixed, as appropriate) the bugs in your current
packaging. Then upload the package.
--
same sponsor to give me upload permission sometime.
I'm willing to sponsor as long as the packages have 2 comaintainers.
I;ve been busy and may continue so for the next few weeks, so maybe it
will take some time for me to actually look at the packages though.
--
Saludos,
Felipe
ue to be so for a while. If you can find another sponsor
please go ahead. I'm unlikely to be available for this until
mid-march.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm
e not taken a look
at the latest iteration though. I was tempted to do a merge and release
(early and often, right?) but I'm going to be particularly unavailable for
about a month so I wouldn't be able to do any necessary followups in a
timely manner.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
ll get the -e option.
Otherwise looks good
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
the slightly weird line about adding stuff
to debian/dirs and then removing it ;)
I will try to upload during the week, if I haven't by the weekend
please ping me again.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
On 2 December 2015 at 20:22, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 2:59 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On 2 December 2015 at 13:33, Roger Shimizu wrote:
>>> I guess he just released 1.29 and forgot to put it in upstream's website.
>>> I didn't con
101 - 175 of 175 matches
Mail list logo
