On 03/08/10 19:29, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 05:04:20PM -0400, Felipe Sateler a écrit : >> >> If upstream were using git, the solution would be pretty simple, just >> branch and merge from upstream as required (as done by many packagers in >> debian). However, subversion is in use, and last time I tried a merge in >> svn it was a complete disaster, so I'm not recommending that strategy. >> What workflows could be used, to avoid a "fork"? > > Dear Felipe, > > how about using git-svn ? > > In parallel, you can forward upstream your changes to the debian directory, so > that merges of new upstream release are easy.
But that would imply changing the scm tool for the maintainer (which I noted above is not me). -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
