Re: BTS Command to get messages to a BUG#

2008-03-17 Thread Evgeni Golov
Hi Michelle, On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 22:40:51 +0100 Michelle Konzack wrote: > Please can you tell me the BTS/PTS command (and the E-Mail) > which I must use to get all messages to a Bug#. You know http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-refcard? ;) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a s

RFS: v86d

2008-04-02 Thread Evgeni Golov
n.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.workaround.org/debian/pool/main/v/v86d/v86d_0.1.3-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Evgeni Golov pgpkn6DPJSuD7.pgp Description: PGP signature

RFS: unshield (updated and adopted package)

2008-05-08 Thread Evgeni Golov
n unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/unshield/unshield_0.5.1-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Evgeni Golov pgpnEw8lJclJn.pgp Description: PGP signature

RFS: dynamite (updated and adopted package)

2008-05-08 Thread Evgeni Golov
ontrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dynamite/dynamite_0.1.1-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Evgeni Golov pgp4T8JFtQAtT.pgp Description: PGP signature

RFS: orange (updated and adopted package)

2008-05-08 Thread Evgeni Golov
debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/orange - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/orange/orange_0.3.1-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Evgeni Golov pgp9yhE

Re: RFS: dynamite (updated and adopted package)

2008-05-08 Thread Evgeni Golov
Hi Vincent, thanks for your reviews. I'll reply here, as this is the longest one. On Thu, 08 May 2008 21:26:21 +0200 Vincent Bernat wrote: > As new maintainer, you should acknowledge NMU (#259294). Yepp, forgot that, fixed now (not yet uploaded, though). > I think that > you should Build-Co

Re: RFS: orange (updated and adopted package)

2008-05-09 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Thu, 08 May 2008 21:30:00 +0200 Vincent Bernat wrote: > Missing Homepage field in debian/control. Missing mention of ltmain.sh > license and all other generated files present in upstream in > debian/copyright. > > Remove "sample" mention in debian/rules. * Added Homepage * Remo

Re: RFS: dynamite (updated and adopted package)

2008-05-09 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Fri, 09 May 2008 07:52:38 +0200 Vincent Bernat wrote: > This adds a link on PTS that a user can easily follow if he wants for > example to find upstream SVN, a forum or a request tracker. This is > easier than to search in debian/copyright by hand. Done: * Homepage * No "sample" * mach

Re: RFS: unshield (updated and adopted package)

2008-05-09 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Thu, 08 May 2008 21:18:20 +0200 Vincent Bernat wrote: > I see no problem with this package. Let's wait tomorrow if someone else > finds something. You found, I fixed :) Now with Homepage and without "sample" in the header. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/unshield/unshield_0.5.1-1

Re: RFS: orange (updated and adopted package)

2008-05-14 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Fri, 09 May 2008 10:36:22 +0200 Vincent Bernat wrote: > I am not sure either. Maybe there is an exception. You can ask on > [EMAIL PROTECTED] As you have seen, I've posted to debian-legal with no reply (except of yours). It seems to be okay as it is. Do you have any further comments abo

Re: RFS: orange (updated and adopted package)

2008-05-19 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Sat, 17 May 2008 10:41:15 +0200 Vincent Bernat wrote: > I have uploaded the three of them. Thank you Vincent! Regards Evgeni -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

how to build two differently configured binaries from the same source?

2008-05-25 Thread Evgeni Golov
Hi *, I am preparing a package for Yabause[1] and wondering what will be the best practice for me. Yabause has two frontends, one Qt and one Gtk. I would like to ship both. Is there any recipe for debian/rules how to create two identical packages but with one configure option changed? Additional

RFS: orange (updated package)

2008-06-10 Thread Evgeni Golov
ontrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/orange/orange_0.3.2-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Evgeni Golov pgpdVZTbyK5mM.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: orange (updated package)

2008-06-16 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:17:03 +0200 Evgeni Golov wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.2-1 > of my package "orange". > > It builds these binary packages: > liborange-dev - development libraries for liborange > liborang

Re: RFS: orange (updated package)

2008-06-16 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:22:20 +0200 Vincent Bernat wrote: > OoO En cette matinée pluvieuse du lundi 16 juin 2008, vers 10:43, Evgeni > Golov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait : > > >> - dget > >> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/orange/orange_0.3.2-1.dsc >

Re: RFS: v86d

2008-06-25 Thread Evgeni Golov
*push* There is a new version (0.1.5-1) on mentors :) http://mentors.workaround.org/debian/pool/main/v/v86d/v86d_0.1.5-1.dsc TIA Evgeni On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 22:49:36 +0200 Evgeni Golov wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "v86d". It is need

RFS: yabause - Yet Another Buggy And Uncomplete Saturn Emulator

2008-07-01 Thread Evgeni Golov
repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/y/yabause/yabause_0.9.6-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Evgeni Golov -- pgpU3hvb1sqS1.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: nemesis (updated package)

2008-07-03 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Thu, 03 Jul 2008 12:02:43 +0200 Andreas Wenning wrote: > Strange, just re-downloaded your package from debian mentors and ran > uscan --report this just gives me a warning: > > uscan warning: In debian/watch, > no matching hrefs for watch line > http://sf.net/nemesis/nemesis-(.*)\.tar\.gz

Re: RFS: yabause - Yet Another Buggy And Uncomplete Saturn Emulator

2008-07-04 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 00:45:33 +0200 Evgeni Golov wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "yabause". > > * Package name: yabause > Version : 0.9.6-1 > Upstream Author : Theo Berkau, Guillaume Duhamel, Fabien Coulon > * URL : ht

Re: RFS: yabause - Yet Another Buggy And Uncomplete Saturn Emulator

2008-07-06 Thread Evgeni Golov
Hi Vincent, On Sat, 05 Jul 2008 20:25:37 +0200 Vincent Bernat wrote: > OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du mercredi 02 juillet 2008, vers 00:45, > Evgeni Golov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait : > > > yabause- Yet Another Buggy And Uncomplete Saturn Emulator > > yabause-

Re: RFS: yabause - Yet Another Buggy And Uncomplete Saturn Emulator

2008-07-09 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Sun, 06 Jul 2008 16:56:28 +0200 Vincent Bernat wrote: > OoO Vers la fin de l'après-midi du dimanche 06 juillet 2008, vers 16:42, > Evgeni Golov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait : > > >> Does free games exist? If not, you should put yabause in > >&

Re: Preferred way to do a chown on package's dirs ?

2008-08-07 Thread Evgeni Golov
Hi, On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:12:42 +0200 Olivier Berger wrote: > I'm not sure I can find authoritative information on how a packager > should change the ownership (chown) of a shipped directory. Not at all in the best case ;) (But yours seems okay to me) > Of course this can be done in the packag

RFS: yabause (updated package)

2008-08-09 Thread Evgeni Golov
debian.net/debian/pool/main/y/yabause - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/y/yabause/yabause_0.9.6-2.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Evgeni Golov pgp

Re: RFS: teseq

2008-08-12 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 04:00:05 + Joe Nahmias wrote: > along with a proposed set of debtags[0] and I'll sponsor you. debtags do not belong into debian/control: http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/faq.html#integration-in-debian Regards Evgeni -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Re: RFS: yabause (updated package) [DONE]

2008-08-12 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Sat, 9 Aug 2008 12:13:19 +0200 Evgeni Golov wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.6-2 > of my package "yabause". Goneri Le Bouder has uploaded it, thanks! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: teseq

2008-08-12 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:37:10 + Joseph Nahmias wrote: > Never said they did. I just want the list so we can enter them in the > debtags database. Okay, sorry then. I missunderstood your first mail then. Regards Evgeni -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubs

RFS: gnujump (updated package/new upstream release)

2008-09-25 Thread Evgeni Golov
d be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Evgeni Golov pgpflpcGigj8H.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: debhelper package and excluding config.guess config.sub from diff

2008-10-22 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:26:39 +0200 Michal Čihař wrote: > Delete files in clean target and copy them in place in build target. s/build/configure/ :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RFS: gtkperf

2009-01-02 Thread Evgeni Golov
n/pool/main/g/gtkperf/gtkperf_0.40+ds-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Evgeni Golov -- Bruce Schneier Fact Number 164: For Bruce Schneier, SHA-1 is merely a compression algorithm. pgpAwYjifJzi8.pgp Description: PGP signature

RFS: brightd

2007-04-17 Thread Evgeni Golov
ebian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/brightd/brightd_0.1-2.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Evgeni Golov -- ^^^| Evgeni -SargentD- Golov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) d(O_o)b | GPG/PGP-Ke

RFS: revoco

2007-04-17 Thread Evgeni Golov
/mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/revoco - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/revoco/revoco_0.3-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Evgeni Gol

Re: RFS: pdf-smp

2007-04-19 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 01:02:04 +0200 Giuseppe Benigno wrote: > pdf-smp- Two service menus for KDE that handles PDF Documents As I see, the package contains only two .desktop files, why don't merge these into pdftk / pdfjam? Btw, pdf-smp sounds like a SMP-enabled pdf creator, or a kernel of the

Re: RFS: brightd

2007-04-25 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 09:57:45 +0200 Evgeni Golov wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "brightd". Is noone interested? I also didn't get any comments/hints on the packaging, so I think it is okay? Regards Evgeni -- ^^^| Evgeni -SargentD- Golov ([EMAIL PR

Re: RFS: brightd

2007-04-26 Thread Evgeni Golov
Hi, On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:52:55 -0500 Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote: > * Your watch file is wrong, the line should be >http://pberndt.com/Programme/Linux/brightd/_download > .*/brightd-(.*)\.tar\.bz2 > and you should remove the rest of the commented examples. Done, thanks. > * You sh

Re: RFS: brightd

2007-04-26 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:41:27 +0100 Neil Williams wrote: > No, it's not. Why are you packaging gpl.txt? Just forgot to remove it ;) > There's a lot of cruft in the watch file - you only need the line that > is in use and the version line. Plus the watch file doesn't work: Cleaned it with help of

Re: RFS: brightd

2007-04-26 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:38:49 -0500 Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote: > > Hm, could you explain that a bit more? I need the binary setuid-root, > > so $USER is able to write to /sys/class/backlight/ > > I previously used install -M 4755 in debian/rules, but this did not > > work, because I don't bu

Re: RFS: brightd

2007-04-26 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:52:55 -0500 Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote: > * Your watch file is wrong, the line should be >http://pberndt.com/Programme/Linux/brightd/_download > .*/brightd-(.*)\.tar\.bz2 > and you should remove the rest of the commented examples. > Given upstream's weird down

Re: RFS: brightd

2007-04-26 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:50:25 -0500 Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote: > No, you *also* need to ensure dh_fixperms does not strip the bits away. > Change the call to > dh_fixperms -X usr/bin/brightd Fine thanks, this works now. Phillip (upstream) released a new version some hours ago, fixing the

Re: RFS: brightd

2007-04-27 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:33:37 +0200 Evgeni Golov wrote: > > dh_fixperms -X usr/bin/brightd > > Fine thanks, this works now. It worked, but lintian and linda cried, so I've added overrides, I hope it is okay so. I've uploaded the new version to mentors: http://mentors.debia

Re: RFS: brightd

2007-05-04 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:10:18 +0200 Evgeni Golov wrote: > > Another problem - acpi-support. You'd need to check whether brightd > > supports more or a different range of laptops to acpi-support which can > > do screen brightness for some laptops and can do other ACPI rela

Re: RFS: revoco

2007-05-04 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 09:55:48 +0200 Evgeni Golov wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "revoco". I am still looking, so I ping this RFS ;) I've just uploaded a slightly updated version of the package, fixing some small issues, enjoy it: http://mentors.debian.net/

Re: RFS: revoco

2007-05-05 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Sat, 05 May 2007 20:52:33 +0300 Damyan Ivanov wrote: > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/revoco/revoco_0.3-1.dsc > > SUID binary... this is scaring me. Is it really necessary? Well, it is not necessary, but helps $USER to control the mouse. You need to write some hex-values to /de

Re: RFS: cdemu

2007-05-17 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Thu, 17 May 2007 16:53:52 +0200 Nico Golde wrote: > You can also run iso images in qemu. What is the difference > here? As I understand the upstream website, cdemu is not for booting an image (as qemu) but for using them as virtual cd. And don't tell now, we have loop - this works for ISO-fi

Re: RFS: revoco

2007-05-17 Thread Evgeni Golov
Sorry for the delay, university keeps me quite busy atm. On Mon, 07 May 2007 14:07:08 +0300 Damyan Ivanov wrote: > > 1. let the binary as it is, and tell $USER he has to use sudo or su > > 2. set the binary suid-root (the code looks OK for me - IANASE) > > 3. create some new group and let udev gi

Re: Question regarding dpkg files

2007-05-22 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Wed, 23 May 2007 08:02:43 +0200 Jan-Pascal van Best wrote: > Is there a list of which users and groups are standard somewhere? /usr/share/doc/base-passwd/users-and-groups.(txt.gz|html) -- ^^^| Evgeni -SargentD- Golov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) d(O_o)b | GPG/PGP-Key-ID: 0xAC15B50C >-|-<

Re: Doubts about PHP

2007-07-19 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 13:42:00 -0300 Eriberto wrote: > Depends: apache2|apache, > libapache2-mod-php5|libapache2-mod-php4|libapache-mod-php5|libapache-mod-php4 > > If I make # apt-get install webmail on a "clean system", it works fine > installing apache2 and libapache2-mod-php5. But, if I install

Re: Compatibility between BSD make and GNU make

2007-12-12 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 05:29:50 +0800 Thomas Goirand wrote: > I'd like to set conditions on variables in a make file to do: > > ifndef $(APP_DIR) > APP_DIR=/usr/share > endif > > This works on Debian, however on FreeBSD, it doesn't work, and I have to > write this: > > .ifndef $(APP_DIR) > APP_DIR

Re: RFS: arc-colors

2009-05-01 Thread Evgeni Golov
Hi Benjamin, On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 22:33:29 +0200 Benjamin Drung wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "arc-colors". I'm interested in this package (and gnome-colors and shiki-colors too), but won't have time to review before sunday/monday, so take this as a sort of ITS :) BTW, I won

Re: RFS: shiki-colors

2009-05-04 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 22:43:46 +0200 Benjamin Drung wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "shiki-colors". This is just a note to other potential sponsors: I intend to sponsor this one together with arc-colors and gnome-colors, you can find my review in the "RFS: arc-colors" thread. re

Re: RFS: arc-colors

2009-05-04 Thread Evgeni Golov
Hi Andrew, Benjamin, On Fri, 1 May 2009 10:56:29 -0400 Andrew wrote: > > BTW, I wonder whether gnome-colors isn't too generic for a package [that > > is not officially from GNOME]. > > > > We debated what to use as the package names and in the end decided on > staying close to the upstream name

Re: RFS: gnome-colors

2009-05-04 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:36:03 +0200 Benjamin Drung wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnome-colors". This is just a note to other potential sponsors: I intend to sponsor this one together with arc-colors and shiki-colors, you can find my review in the "RFS: arc-colors" thread. re

Re: RFS: arc-colors

2009-05-05 Thread Evgeni Golov
Hey, On Tue, 5 May 2009 02:50:56 -0400 Andrew wrote: > Well, I use GNOME and can attest to the fact that they work there as well. =) Great, in the end it's your package and you get the angry users if you make mistakes :) > > */debian/control: > >  + Vcs-Bzr should be Vcs-Browser? Vcs-Bzr should

Re: RFS: arc-colors, gnome-colors, shiki-colors

2009-05-06 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Wed, 06 May 2009 17:55:22 +0200 Benjamin Drung wrote: > gnome-colors 3.2 and shiki-colors 3.9 were released. I have updated the > packages and uploaded them to mentors.debian.net. Great, next time please send links to .dsc files, it's easier for me then :) Now my remarks: */debian/copyright:

Re: RFS: arc-colors, gnome-colors, shiki-colors

2009-05-06 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Thu, 7 May 2009 01:41:01 +0200 Evgeni Golov wrote: > + grep -ri licen gnome-*/* |grep -vi "GPL/2.0" |grep -vi "cc:license" >is interesting too, it lists LGPL and CC-BY-SA-2.0 and 2.5 too. >And also CC-BY-NC-3.0 too - this is non-free! :( Ew, forgot to

Re: RFS: arc-colors, gnome-colors, shiki-colors

2009-05-07 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Wed, 6 May 2009 20:44:49 -0400 Andrew wrote: > I have a more general question on debian/copyright. Obviously all of > the above needs to be resolved, but upstream has mentioned in the past > that they are simply interested in having a free license and are not > tied to GPL-3. So I wonder if the

ITS: arc-colors, gnome-colors, shiki-colors are ready

2009-05-29 Thread Evgeni Golov
Hi Benjamin, On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 02:31:38PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote: > all license issues are resolved now. Some problematic files (e.g. > CC-BY-NC-3.0 licensed) were replaced. Upstream was very helpful with all > these issues. Great! > Here are the links to the .dsc files for the new p

Re: ITS: arc-colors, gnome-colors, shiki-colors are ready

2009-05-29 Thread Evgeni Golov
Privet Dima! On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 03:45:11PM +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: > > I'll have a look at these the next days (prolly not before thuesday > > though). > > So is that Tuesday or Thursday?? =D Bleh, got me. Never write mails while doing "important" work :) I meant tuesday, the

Re: ITS: arc-colors, gnome-colors, shiki-colors are ready

2009-05-29 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 05:06:17PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote: > > BTW, is there no more shiki-colors package? only -murrine? > > shiki-colors-murrine is the Murrine version and shiki-colors is the > Clearlooks version. Murrine is faster and recommended for everyone who > has Murrine 0.90.3 or ne

Re: ITS: arc-colors, gnome-colors, shiki-colors are ready

2009-06-04 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Fri, 29 May 2009 14:31:38 +0200 Benjamin Drung wrote: > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Okay, Dima was right, thursday, not tuesday :) But here comes my review, very cosmetic: arc-colors-1.7.1/debian/copyright: + You miss © everywhere. + Please write an own Copyright:

Re: ITS: arc-colors, gnome-colors, shiki-colors are ready

2009-06-04 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:42:54 +0200 Benjamin Drung wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 04.06.2009, 13:18 +0200 schrieb Evgeni Golov: > > On Fri, 29 May 2009 14:31:38 +0200 Benjamin Drung wrote: > > > > > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. > > > >

Re: ITS: arc-colors, gnome-colors, shiki-colors are ready

2009-06-04 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 15:23:59 -0400 Andrew SB wrote: > I suppose the real question is whether or not including the copyright > year is a MUST or SHOULD. As Benjamin notes, gnome-icon-theme is > already in Debian and does not include the years in their > debian/copyright. It's a should as far as I k

Re: ITS: arc-colors, gnome-colors, shiki-colors are ready

2009-06-04 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 15:37:58 -0400 Victor Castillejo wrote: > I'll try to make a list of all the icons if necessary, but it seems like > that will take a long time to manually go through all of them. More a nicehave here, I think. Others may think different... > BTW, is the Shiki package the only

Re: ITS: arc-colors, gnome-colors, shiki-colors are ready

2009-06-04 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 22:13:02 +0200 Benjamin Drung wrote: > > Again, that would be best. But if this proves problematic, would > > simply removing this section be acceptable, since putting them in the > > public domain explicitly gives up copyright? Implying that we are > > relicensing them in Debi

Re: ITS: arc-colors, gnome-colors, shiki-colors are ready

2009-06-04 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 01:59:30AM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 04.06.2009, 23:10 +0200 schrieb Evgeni Golov: > > Evgeni, ending the mail-flood for now and hating the fact that PD does > > not exist in Germany as it does in US etc. > > It's sad, t

Re: ITS: arc-colors, gnome-colors, shiki-colors are ready

2009-06-04 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 02:14:38AM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote: > > I'll try to make a list of all the icons if necessary, but it seems > > like that will take a long time to manually go through all of them. > > Evgeni, your opinion? I think, it would be nice, but not necessary. Didn't I wrote it

ITS: visualboyadvance (updated package)

2009-06-24 Thread Evgeni Golov
Hi Nick! On Sat, 20 Jun 2009 16:55:52 -0700 (PDT) nick.ell...@ubuntu.com wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.8.0-5 > of my package "visualboyadvance". > > It builds these binary packages: > visualboyadvance - a full featured Game Boy Advance emulator > visualboyadvance-gtk

Re: RFS: python-ipcalc

2009-06-24 Thread Evgeni Golov
Hi, On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:44:30 + mezgani ali wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-ipcalc". Looks interesting, esp for some work I'll have to do soon :) > python-ipcalc - Python module that allows you to perform IP subnet > calculations Here are some quick findings,

Re: ITS: visualboyadvance (updated package)

2009-06-24 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 05:23:30PM -0700, Nick Ellery wrote: > Thanks a lot! I'll update the short descriptions right away on mentors. Ok, will have a look at it tomorrow after university. > > > > But what I really wanted to write you: would you be interested in > > joining pkg-games? We mainta

Re: RFS: python-ipcalc

2009-06-27 Thread Evgeni Golov
s > Best regards > > 2009/6/25 mezgani ali > > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > > > >> [mezgani ali, 2009-06-25] > >> > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1:32 AM, Evgeni Golov > >> wrote: > >

Re: RFS: python-ipcalc

2009-06-30 Thread Evgeni Golov
Hi, On Sat, 27 Jun 2009 22:08:59 +0200 mezgani ali wrote: > Ok Evgeni, you know it was difficult for me to divine it :) Yeah I guess so, no problem :) > > Ok, I'll have a look on Monday or so, quite busy right at the moment. For some monday==tuesday ;) I had a look at your package yesterday a

Re: RFS: python-ipcalc

2009-07-01 Thread Evgeni Golov
Hi Ali, On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 10:48:16 + mezgani ali wrote: > I applied the patch, i setup the watch file and the README.source > Well you did the hard work for me Evengi ;) Aye, the new package looks very good. Just a question, why does your orig.tar.gz have a different md5sum then the one on

Re: RFS: python-ipcalc

2009-07-01 Thread Evgeni Golov
Hi, On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 12:01:11 + mezgani ali wrote: > I setup the License field in the pkg-info file, also i did some change to > setup.py. > those are the changes that i maked to the upstream source. > and i think that was not really necessary. > > The orig.tar.gz looks to be the same as t

Re: RFS: python-ipcalc [DONE]

2009-07-01 Thread Evgeni Golov
Hey, On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 12:55:14PM +, mezgani ali wrote: > I'll use quilt, if it is God's will ;) Heh, god, don't think we should discuss this further ;) > No, i don't have any change, you can upload, thanks I had one :) I added "python" to the list of Depends for the binary package