Hi Vincent, thanks for your reviews. I'll reply here, as this is the longest one.
On Thu, 08 May 2008 21:26:21 +0200 Vincent Bernat wrote: > As new maintainer, you should acknowledge NMU (#259294). Yepp, forgot that, fixed now (not yet uploaded, though). > I think that > you should Build-Conflicts against autoconf2.13 and automake1.4 like you > did for unshield. I did not, the Build-Conflicts are from the old maintainer, but they won't hurt if added. > It would be nice to use machine-readable format for debian/copyright. I > think that you should also add ltmain.sh license in it (I have forgotten > it for unshield too). machine-readable is a good hint, I did that for unshield, but not for the other two. But should I really add copyright information off *all* Makefile.in, aclocal.m4, config.guess, config.rpath, config.sub, configure, depcomp, install-sh, ltmain.sh and missing? > Remove the mention that debian/rules is a sample file. Eh, yepp, done. > And add an Homepage field in debian/control (I have also forgotten this > for unshield !). Well, with which value? I thought about it before uploading, but www.synce.org contains no information about unshield/dynamite/orange. The only possible would be sf.net/projects/synce, but that's not really a homepage. Regards Evgeni -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
