an/patches/10_gcc4.3_includes
| * Drop trailing spaces in debian/rules at the same time.
| * Bump Standards-Version from 3.7.2 to 3.7.3 (no change needed).
|
| -- Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thu, 20 Dec 2007 02:49:18 +0100
`---
About k3dsurf (http://k3dsurf.sourceforge.net/):
,--
?
If it contains only architecture-independant data: “all”. “any”
otherwise, unless it is supposed to only run on this and that
architecture, in which case you put “Architecture: this that” there.
In most cases, you're going to use either “all” or “any”.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpw65q
On 20/12/2007, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> I'd be glad if someone could check and possibly upload the following
> source package for me:
>
> http://alioth.debian.org/~kibi-guest/k3dsurf/k3dsurf_0.6.2-2.dsc
Still the same location, with the attached additional commit, which
ta
On 26/12/2007, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Still the same location, with the attached additional commit, which
> takes care of extra linking.
Uploaded by ana.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpTPDGdq87D2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
as well.
> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
I didn't dig it much more, but I might help a bit with the gcj stuff.
You might have a look at the pkg-phototools group, more information on
the website[1].
1. http://pkg-phototools.alioth.debian.org/
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpQ5XePFFhCg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
th.debian.org/
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpZrZKLGTqss.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 09/01/2008, Joel Franco wrote:
> I do not understand what means "serverstats or webissues in
> lenny/sid". Where can i read about it?
apt-get source one or the other, then look at debian/copyright.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpm5YasILFHh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 09/01/2008, Robert Vogel wrote:
> Couldn't find this link...Is it ok ?
Uploaded already:
| Subject: Accepted zynaddsubfx 2.2.1-4.1 (source i386)
Keeping only lists in To:, list policy blah blah.
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgphWMwN0nEPx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hard moderations rules are quite
inconvenient anyway (like you have one or two questions to ask on a
list, and have to temporary subscribe, instead of setting
Reply-To/asking people to keep you in Cc in their replies).
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpc4q4RCZ8xf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
er one. What
I usually do in this case is the following:
clone + reassign + retitle + block the old one with the new one.
(block is just a documentation marker.)
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpuQePccvWb1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
hin the team, since he needs it for a gimp plugin.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgprDW6xB3Ky6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
> % bts block 456871 by -1
>
> Correct, or did I screw up already?
Quite correct, but how does the BTS know what -1 refers to if you issue
your commands one after the other? Either you use a *single* bts
command, using delimiters (see the manpage), or you put all these
commands the body of a mail you send to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpfcPIgH105l.pgp
Description: PGP signature
alioth, I guess
you're robinc-guest (so that I add you to the group).
> PS: I am not currently subscribed to pkg-phototools so please CC me or
> ensure a reply goes to debian-mentors (which i am subscribed).
Let me know once you're subscribed, we'll take care of everyt
27;s not a workaround so
that source-only uploads can happen.
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpxmwUAMfK76.pgp
Description: PGP signature
he above
> question about why they work that way.
Check for “source only uploads” in the list archives, and maybe in the
DWN. First shot gives [1,2].
1. http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/10/msg01226.html
2. http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/10/msg01227.html
--
Cyril Brul
e: it's not like i386 is a rare architecture and
it isn't possible to find some machines that could act as build daemons.
Remember Vancouver?
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpLkzjSjU08F.pgp
Description: PGP signature
igration suffered from that. Are you saying that redundancy is
totally useless and that one should just not care about it?
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgprjHEnD5CA3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I guess some packages might be exceptions to such a rule, like compilers
or other packages needing bootstrap at some point.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpzU2yrXnby0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
g. because online helps will be sufficient, if ever
needed).
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgplbIdro2s7S.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 08/01/2008, José Sánchez Moreno wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnomecatalog".
FWIW, 0.3.3-3 just landed in NEW.
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpYxby5Z4A1Z.pgp
Description: PGP signature
released.
> I wrote up the experiences while building the package at
> http://www.csn.ul.ie/~mel/docs/debianstart/ in case it's useful to
> anyone.
Thanks.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpNFUE5BpZYQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ut that's
better than nothing. I'm happy to see you've already reported that
upstream.
> Thanks a lot for your help,
That was a *very* quick review to help you find some stuff to work
on/learn from. Hope it'll keep you busy some moment. ;-)
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpfqXUT9sJli.pgp
Description: PGP signature
do so?
- You don't use any VCS to maintain your packaging?
> The package appears to be lintian clean.
Being a bit picky:
I: mg: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign usr/share/man/man1/mg.1.gz:30
I: mg: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign usr/share/man/man1/mg.1.gz:31
Quite easy to fix, though.
C
” output. That works fine in most cases AFAICT.
> Any recomendations is welcome :)
Double-checking what the Architecture field is for should be #1 on your
priorities list. ;)
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgp68rSx9LNEk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
cerns the checksum files. All the rest should be
> pretty complete.
You might want to use the download page[1] although it doesn't contain
any link to .7 currently.
1. http://www.falconpl.org/?page_id=downloads
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgphbCbljJ9xs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
us
| Processing watchfile line for package falcon...
| Newest version on remote site is 0.8.6, local version is 0.8.7
| falcon: remote site does not even have current version
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpY6aIlBpB0v.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ld system, so that might be a
burden to handle a patch management system. But in the long run, once
you've sorted out versioning and stack troubles with upstream, switching
to a patch management system will help you. Maybe not in the few next
days or weeks, but you'll see for yourself. ;-)
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpKeSFYVNFLm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ld also have a look at backports.org,
which contain detail instructions on how to provide with backports, to
see why such an option can be needed.
> Thanks for your feedback,
You're welcome.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpGK1jQTKMM0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
same time? If you won't, just call it
libsetproctitle-dev.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpK5CYNxZKvN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
share/man/man1/gitstats.1
W: gitstats: copyright-lists-upstream-authors-with-dh_make-boilerplate
W: gitstats: changelog-file-not-compressed changelog.Debian
(You want to run lintian with -i and -I.)
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpRGYtUG9YbG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
now, no need
to override it AFAICT.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpzSXC4lWtxb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
27;t find information about the
> Vcs-* fields, can you point me to them please?
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.announce/1143
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgp0v7DnYlSP5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
should only one be chosen?
Alternatives aren't an issue. Small (1-script-with-a-single-purpose
falls in the “small” category) packages are usually frowned upon.
Especially if that pastebinit does its job right and supports multiple
hosts.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpqTr7Zt9rqV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
s)
No problem. I guess that somehow merging all scripts into the same
package, or even into the same script shouldn't be hard, and would make
the whole better.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpZcqrDjdfab.pgp
Description: PGP signature
nary package (just because it is distributed in source
> package).
(Don't do 2a., as pointed out by Baby already.)
If you're going that way, you may want to notify the security team that
you're embedding code copies, but that you aren't using them. Details:
http://wiki.debian.o
onger an XS- field, see the changelog entry of dpkg/1.14.16.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgp84OzIG6uFr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
uilt one and the
“Barry one”) binaries are the same. Could it be that these NEEDED
dependencies previously came from extra linking and/or from extra Libs
in pkgconfig files (or similar), now moved to Libs.private?
Note that xmlrpc-c is in a strange shape (build states), I'm contacting
seanius through private mail about that.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpj6W4Uhyu2f.pgp
Description: PGP signature
cripts and dpkg's changelog might be considered a SHOULD
in the policy, but I must confess that following dpkg these days is a
bit challenging. :)
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpygpqRdifnY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ile-vars.mk:_cdbs_deprecated_vars +=
DEB_MAKE_TEST_TARGET
| /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/makefile-vars.mk:DEB_MAKE_CHECK_TARGET =
$(DEB_MAKE_TEST_TARGET)
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgp3geKXHI1eT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
iles are automatically
detected when dh_make'ing and added to the docs file, later used by
dh_installdocs.
| our @DOCS= split / |\n/, `ls -1 N[Ee][Ww][Ss] *[Ff][Aa][Qq]* *.[Tt][Xx][Tt]
README* *.README [rR]eadme* *.[rR]eadme [Bb][Uu][Gg][Ss] *[tT][oO][dD][oO]*
2>/dev/null`;
Cheers,
--
Cyril Br
As I see this is usually maintained by Miriam, and she has DM
> privilege, wouldn't be better for you both if she does the upload and
> set the DM-Allowed field?
For this particular package, that looks like a nice idea.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgp2kjMkkbwSa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
for that, just get added
to the collab-maint group, log into alioth, cd /git/collab-maint,
generate a new repository (a script is there) and push your branches and
tags there. It's even said to be backuped for you (!).
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpBFv0BnowBY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
it to Debian).
Which shouldn't take long if the patches get submitted to the Debian
maintainers (as opposed to relying on the Debian maintainers to dig
patches.ubuntu.com on her/his own — which I had several times already,
and is a bit of… weird).
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpr1ujyS6yk5.pgp
times have
to modify the Makefiles to add some -lfoo or -lbar, or e.g. add
TARGET_LINK_LIBRARIES() in cmake build systems.
That's a bit of work, but you'll probably end up with less
dependencies (expressed in less Depends:), which is obviously
(installed size, testing migration, etc.)
learn about linker
flags, and possibly have a deeper view on how autotools, cmake, scons
(erk) deal with that.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois, still in NM, FWIW.
pgpgNdwPtc9AF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-Wl,--as-needed -Wl,zdefs is not at that stage, yet.
In the thread (on -devel) where the use of those options were
discussed, I don't remind of people reporting broken packages due to
that. But if you could find examples of broken packages because of
that, I'm very interested (in having a look and eventually fixing them
if I can do that).
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpUIuPy4cVfN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ng.
Not to mention that we are on -mentors, and that packages get
double-checked, by the sponsoree (which is supposed to have checked
the runtime quite seriously), and by a sponsor, who could at least
spot the use of --as-needed without -z,defs.
Really, I don't see why we shouldn't encourage people using those
options.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpUtuNNnbi31.pgp
Description: PGP signature
s guaranteed already; or you're building a
backport of whatever, for which those fields are AFAICT quite
irrelevant. And dpkg is quite cool, and should only discard
unrecognized fields, and shouldn't fail because of them.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpVAEzHFl3yT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
his is a more general dysfunctioning.
mipsel has a huge backlog, and ISTR that mips too. Nothing related to
your particular packages, I'd say. Remarks based on some packages of
mine, and of some packages I've been more or less tracking during the
last weeks.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgp
people
even offer access to their architectures to mere contributors (hppa,
kfreebsd-*, for example).
> Would look awesome to stand apart with a mips(el) or s390 upload,
> when others are doing only source+{i386,amd64}. :-)
You're forgetting powerpc uploads anyway. :p
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpAudAZWrfYC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
'd bet it's more likely to have a subscriber of -mips than a
subscriber of -mentors be able to do so, that's why I replied with a
cross-post. You might want to try [EMAIL PROTECTED], but looks
to me you might have more chance by asking the -mips subscribers.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpmx7ObiBLxq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ream makefile, so that you can specifying some flags
from debian/rules (like "-g -O0" in C(C)FLAGS).
I think it's all for now, let me know if you have any troubles, or
when you have an updated package, I'll have it sponsored.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpkfQWkDWbSY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
/ directory in the released tarballs:
http://kitenet.net/~joey/blog/entry/on_debian_directories_in_upstream_tarballs/
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgp49SYfPwkUQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 06/02/2008, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> OK. Specifying a fixed subject.
And uploaded.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpH9PcddM6mO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
e that if a package isn't DFSG-free, it can't go to contrib either.
Contrib is for DFSG-free material depending on non-free (or contrib in
turn) stuff, see Policy 2.2.2.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpEMeCiAgb5l.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 06/02/2008, Sebastian Harl wrote:
> Just to make this clear […]
Yep, thank you (all) for clarifying that, sorry for the inconvenience.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpyGch4L5nAE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
] Erreur 1
`
> but I can't understand why it couldn't suggest something like:
>
> [ -f Makefile ] && $(MAKE) distclean
>
> which triggers the same result (at least in bash -- that's why I'm
> supposing that "&&" needs to be escaped somehow in Makefiles).
Explained already in my first mail, and in extenso by Justin.
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpy7kq0QwpEG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
d success.
If not foo, then not bar, and failure. Here is your problem.
The foo/bar relationship is the same, but not the return code, which
is problematic in a Makefile, since it introduces a failure, thus make
stops (see lintian about ignoring the errors in the clean target).
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpK2yQJ1P7Md.pgp
Description: PGP signature
instead of just a list of bugs, titles,
severities as I proposed above, but the idea is just the same.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpCX1ODeUXnL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
toolchain
is currently buggy and would make your package FTBFS?). Current
statuses of various architectures aren't a reason to do so.
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpZzqgAMssjw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ur isn't what I call eating CPU. Go and see how many
*hours* are spent in some packages. Again, I'd rather see buildd being
used as much as possible to catch problems at build time than letting
bugs pass through and bite users at runtime, which is always a PITA to
debug. YMMV.
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpwdLKzcWCwG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 14/02/2008, Charles Plessy wrote:
> If you or somebody else agree that it is of general interest (in
> private if you want to limit the traffic on this list), I can
> propose an update for the Developpers Reference.
Isn't that just basic UNIX knowledge?
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgp
d starting around
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgp6HJ8IFaX8W.pgp
Description: PGP signature
copy around. I'm also thinking of git manpages,
with cross-references and the like, where it's very handy to have them
in HTML format. I don't know whether that applies to nettee, though.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpmzSNLxsM18.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 27/02/2008, Barry deFreese wrote:
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/colorgcc/colorgcc_1.3.2.0-8.dsc
Being taken care of.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgplmaBgAevDv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 28/02/2008, Mauro Lizaur wrote:
> Well, i would like to hear more opinions and some advices on how to do this.
Hi,
http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpVecbTAupDK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 29/02/2008, Carlo Segre wrote:
> I know that it is possible to add a second binary architecture .deb
> to an upload. I just can't seem to find it documented anywhere.
mergechanges(1)
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpbjoPdJpyWP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
hich might explain why Barry introduced above-the-usual-NMU-level
changes.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpb43OgxtRFp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ths on the binaries
(regardless of the architecture, no need to special-case). Poke me if
you need examples.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpTtAXLechCm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
normally do when using subversion sources, rather
> than a numbered release? That's obviously part of my problem here,
> since libdmtx-0.4.0 is really libdmtx-0.4.0+svn102.
I don't see how preparing svn thingies are relevant here, you just have
to adapt the clean target to get
On 15/03/2008, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Please can you tell me the BTS/PTS command (and the E-Mail)
> which I must use to get all messages to a Bug#.
Would "bts -m show N" suit your needs?
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpMnGbcNOr0L.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 15/03/2008, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Please can you tell me the BTS/PTS command (and the E-Mail)
> which I must use to get all messages to a Bug#.
Would "bts -m show N" suit your needs?
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
PS: Sending again, possibly broken ISP.
pgpmb1sunmdur.pgp
On 22/03/2008, Carlo Segre wrote:
> As of a short time ago, this no longer works and results in a broken
> watch file. Does anyone know if this is permanent or alternatively, a
> better (at least working) URL to use in the watch file?
man uscan, http://sf.net/ is your friend.
Cheers,
, your diff is empty. Shouldn't you be building a Debian native
package if you're including your debian/ directory in the original
tarball? Anyway, I'll recommend *not* doing so, and keeping debian/
outside of the tarball, not building a Debian native package.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpy4SWxjKO3p.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 22/03/2008, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> [things]
Woops, I almost forgot in those few comments that you're not closing
your ITP bug in your changelog.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpdvjKT5uLuZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
e, all
debhelper | 5.0.42 |stable | source, all
debhelper | 6.0.5 | testing | source, all
debhelper | 6.0.10 | unstable | source, all
So, unless you're backporting for oldstable, that's quite safe.
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpcjvDjynoZa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
e some “ng” packages aging since '96. :p
> Bug 462605 was fixed, not introduced, in 3.8.A~rc4-1.
I believe it's due to your package not being built on every arch.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpdPN930rGqE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 08/04/2008, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> As far as I can see your package is perl-only, so
> [...]
> 3) Why is your package Architecture: all instead of any?
Why are you asking questions you've answered already?
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpyI9lKR8lcD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 21/04/2008, Ben Finney wrote:
> I'd appreciate any feedback from those more experienced with Debian
> packaging in general and Python packaging in particular.
I won't be able to comment much on the python part since you're using
-central, that I don't know.
Anyway, some quick comments:
- debh
On 21/04/2008, Ben Finney wrote:
> I can't easily find administrative contact email address at the Alioth
> website http://alioth.debian.org/>, so I'm asking here in the
> hope of some overlap.
Just gave it a quick shot, you can search for “alioth” in
“Software/group”, and spot “Site admin”, and t
On 24/04/2008, Ben Finney wrote:
> > Did you get the mail from Alexander?
>
> Alexander who? When was it sent?
Schmehl.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2008/04/msg00330.html
Mraw,
KiBi.
pgpCHeoD6L7Mb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 25/04/2008, Ben Finney wrote:
> How is it difficult to read? I've opened it in Emacs and 'zless' and
> in either of them it reads like any other diff. Like any other unified
> diff, the changes are clearly marked by file, hunk location, and
> context lines. What readability problems are you seei
On 27/04/2008, Deepak Tripathi wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "php5-rar".
Various remarks:
- debian/Changelog, what for?
- debian/control: buggy indentation in long description.
- debian/control: unsure about the section, please check the php
policy.
- debian/copyright:
On 27/04/2008, Deepak Tripathi wrote:
> It builds these binary packages:
> php5-rar - rar module for PHP 5
Ah, I forgot that point: is the algo the same as in unrar? unrar-free?
You might need to adjust the section in the former case; and to adjust
the description for the latter, to be more prec
On 27/04/2008, Wen-Yen Chuang wrote:
> The only one lintian warning is
> "W: gcin: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libgcin-im-client1".
> It is unnecessary to pack a "libgcin-im-client1" package, because
> libgcin-im-client.so.1.0.2 is only used by gcin internally.
I didn't build it, so I cannot
On 27/04/2008, Gonéri Le Bouder wrote:
> > You can read more about that at
> > http://wiki.debian.org/RpathIssue
> >
> > That should be fixed...
>
> "Currently, the only generally accepted use of this feature in Debian
> is to add non-standard library path (like /usr/lib/) to
> libraries that are o
On 29/04/2008, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote:
> I assume that the gencontrol warning is connected to the missing
> dependency. I have, though, got ${shlibs:Depends} in Depends
What does dpkg --info on the binaries say? (pipe it into grep ^Depends)
> and I even tried manually adding libc too, all withou
(List-reply is your friend, I don't need extra copies, thanks.)
On 29/04/2008, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote:
> Ahhh. Thanks. Now it is lintian clean. But I have the following
> warnings. In another package, I fixed similar warning by setting
> LDLOADLIBS in rules. I could set LIBS here, except that
> /
On 01/05/2008, Brandon wrote:
> Team has an abundance of maintainers, and not enough developers. Games
> packages are often "pending upload" for many months at a time.
Which might have changed some time ago, look at Gonéri's upload rate if
you're not convinced.
Mraw,
KiBi.
pgp7zEx4lobEz.pgp
Des
On 05/05/2008, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
> IANADD, but I would put the doc and example files in
> /usr/share/doc/packagename-doc.
> /usr/share/doc/packagename/README.Debian should mention that the
> reader can find doc in /usr/share/doc/packagename-doc once the
> packagename-doc package is installed.
On 05/05/2008, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
> Actually I was sort of guessing the only package allowed to put
> anything under /usr/share/doc// was itself. It's
> probably the core of the original post. Is this assumption incorrect?
AFAICT, yes. Particularly when the binaries come from the very same
so
On 10/05/2008, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> I see no other problem with your package. Let's see if some one else
> finds one. You could improve a bit the manual page by stating that -i
> and -o are mandatory, that -i waits for a video file and -o will output
> a PNG.
You could spare some Depend
On 11/05/2008, Alexander Bürger wrote:
> Sorry, I was not on the debian-mentors list.
In which case, you might want to add an In-Reply-To header, pointing
to the message you're answering to, so that the thread won't break.
Mraw,
KiBi.
pgpav5I4oXVgC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 21/05/2008, Simon Richter wrote:
> I wonder what we should do with ASIO.
>
> You are essentially patching the source to use the ASIO version inside
> Boost. There is also a standalone ASIO library (which uses "asio"
> instead of "boost::asio")
I've been told long ago (months) that the standalo
On 22/05/2008, Neil Williams wrote:
> To check the arch, always test against the HOST architecture. Native
> builds set HOST == BUILD but if the package is ever cross-built, your
> debian/rules must allow building an ARM package on amd64 (HOST=ARM,
> BUILD=amd64) and *NOT* enable -mtune.
That shou
On 22/05/2008, Neil Williams wrote:
> I currently spend large amounts of time crossbuilding packages for ARM
> on amd64 machines so, yes, ARM on amd64 was an example.
This might not be that obvious for people not aware of your timetable,
which is why I highlighted it was meant to be an example rat
On 22/05/2008, Neil Williams wrote:
> > I think csound is unlikely to be cross-built. Sound synthesis is a
> > pretty cpu-intensive task.
>
> :-) don't think that cross-building is only for low resource units.
And please don't second-guess people in general. Think of those using
clusters, e.g.
On 25/05/2008, Christopher James Halse Rogers wrote:
> The upload would fix these bugs: 443934
Reported by: "Diego Escalante Urrelo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Date: Tue, 25 Sep
2007 02:36:04 UTC.
Although I read:
Feel free to take over, I have lost interest.
there's also:
Just to let anyone readi
On 28/05/2008, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
> Hi,
o<,
maybe you missed the following bits?
“[Please CC me in all replies, or reply only to me.]”
Mraw,
KiBi.
pgpTqlUSvqhBF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 02/06/2008, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
> > Since you are removing non-free stuff from orig tarball, you
> > should either explain in README.Debian-source how to get the dfsg
> > tarball from the orig tarball or add a get-orig-source in
> > debian/rules.
>
> README.Debian-source added. Cha
1 - 100 of 273 matches
Mail list logo
