On 10/01/2008, Frank Terbeck wrote: > I could work around that problem quite simply. However, I think it > would be preferable, if 'tdb.h' would be fixed.
Sure. > My question is, if it would be the right thing to do is to reassign > the bug to tdb-dev and add a comment about signal.h to it? Or should I > rather create a new bug against tdb-dev about the problem? Simply reassigning is IMHO OK, but if someone else sees this FTBFS, and sees no one reported against your package, that someone could open a bug against your package, w/o checking that its root is in another one. What I usually do in this case is the following: clone + reassign + retitle + block the old one with the new one. (block is just a documentation marker.) Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois
pgpuQePccvWb1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
