Re: RFS - kde-style-polyester

On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 07:29:45AM +, Sune Vuorela wrote: > ITP: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=338635 > > Source: polyester > Section: kde > Priority: optional > Maintainer: Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5.0.0), automake1.9, autoconf, l

Re: RFS - two icon sets for kde - kde-icons-gorilla and kde-icons-korilla

On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 06:11:30PM +, Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2006-05-28, Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> http://mirror.pusling.com/kgorilla > > > > Just checking kde-icons-korilla. Lintian is right: > > > > E: kde-icons-koril

Re: RFS - kde-style-polyester

On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 05:35:31PM +, Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2006-05-28, Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> And the package is here: > >> http://mirror.pusling.com/polyester-rfs/ > > > > Could you name the source package "kde-style-p

Re: [RFS] wormux - A funny fight game on 2D maps

On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 12:14:02PM +0200, Jean Parpaillon wrote: > That should be good now... I hope so :-) A new version (0.7.2-2) is > available : > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/wormux/ Looks much better. One issue though... when I run wormux here I get: wormux: error while l

Re: [RFS] wormux - A funny fight game on 2D maps

Salut, Jean... On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 04:36:48PM +0200, Jean Parpaillon wrote: > Fixed it. When I "cleaned" calls to dh_* scripts, I removed > dh_shlibdeps... Shame on me ;-) > > New version is 0.7.2-3. Yes, this one looks good. I had uploaded it 30 minutes earlier but I was playing Wormux. :)

Re: RFS: mpdscribble

On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 10:44:16PM +0200, Michal Čihař wrote: > I'm looking for sponsor to upload new upstream version of mpdscribble. > It is already in archives [1], but original sponsor lost interest in > uploading this. Package is linda and lintian clear. It's not linda clean here. A strange w

Re: [RFS] kde-style-klearlook: Clone of GNOME's Clearlooks theme

Hi, Matej... On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 04:46:55PM -0400, Matej Cepl wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for kde-style-klearlook: > > * Package name: kde-style-klearlook > Version : 0.9.9.2 > Upstream Author : Craig Drummond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * URL : http://www.kde-lo

Re: [RFS] wormux - A funny fight game on 2D maps

On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 01:51:43AM +0300, Eddy Petrişor wrote: > On 6/3/06, Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 04:36:48PM +0200, Jean Parpaillon wrote: > >> Fixed it. When I "cleaned" calls to dh_* scripts, I remove

Re: [RFS] kde-style-klearlook: Clone of GNOME's Clearlooks theme

On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 11:25:53PM -0400, Matej Cepl wrote: > Christoph Haas wrote: > > Third your package should mention the years of copyright in > > debian/copyright to be legally okay. > > No, it shouldn't -- I fixed it, because I did want to make this package &

Re: [RFS] kde-style-klearlook: Clone of GNOME's Clearlooks theme

On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 02:24:20PM -0400, Matej Cepl wrote: > Christoph Haas wrote: > > I forgot one thing. Please name the source package in debian/control > > identical to the binary package that you create. That's easier in the > > Debian namespace unless you plan to

Re: RFS: mpdscribble [Uploaded]

On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 01:12:19AM +0200, Michal Čihař wrote: > I'm looking for sponsor to upload new upstream version of > mpdscribble[1]. It is already in archives [2], but original sponsor > lost interest in uploading this. Package is linda and lintian clear > (this time even without double link

mentors.debian.net relaunched

Good morning, we - the mentors.debian.net team - have been running the mentors service for 3 years now. During that period ~500 package maintainers have uploaded many revisions of ~1200 different packages. Still the service was not very user-friendly and we could have done better to help maintaine

Re: mentors.debian.net relaunched

On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 10:30:37AM +0200, Kevin Bube wrote: > the mail address <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> bounces. I sent a private > mail to your debian address with the log of the bounce message. Yes, I received it. Thanks. I still blame it on outdated DNS data because I can reach the support address f

Re: mentors.debian.net relaunched

On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 11:05:32AM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote: > On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 10:30:37AM +0200, Kevin Bube wrote: > > Another problem that occured to me is that the sign-up web interface > > refuses my publickey. It complains that the mail address I entered does &

Re: mentors.debian.net relaunched

On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 04:06:40PM +0200, Kevin Bube wrote: > Now I get this: > > Traceback (most recent call last): File [...] Fixed, too. :) I hope that this concludes the debugging on this mailing list. Please send further bug reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (or if that address fails: [EMAIL PR

Re: mentors.debian.net relaunched

On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 07:28:45AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 10:13:33AM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote: > > Since switching to the new site means changing DNS entries the server > > may temporarily be unavailable. There are also rumors that our > > [EMA

Re: Request-For-Sponsorship (xfardic)

On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 10:31:46PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 09:36:59AM +, Alan Baghumian wrote: > > * Package name : xfardic > > First, it would be nice if the subject could contain the package's > name. Perhaps the m.d.n boilerplate could include it. Good h

Re: RFS: python-iplib

On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 11:37:58AM +0200, Giuseppe Martino wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0-2 > of my package "python-iplib". I just saw that we have an NMU for this package because we were too slow with this upload. :) Could you take the NMU package and adopt it? (I ta

Re: Issue with website ?

On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 11:31:18AM +0200, Jean Parpaillon wrote: > I've (d)uploaded a new version of the package wormux yesterday on > mentors.debian.net. > It is still in /incoming and I've not received any email. Is it normal ? The package itself consists of different files. The process dealing

Re: Package update (was: Issue with website ?)

On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 04:42:26PM +0200, Jean Parpaillon wrote: > I have another question :-) > You signed the version of this package. How to deal with updates ? I'm > not DD. > Have I to upload on mentors and ask for a sponsor at every package update ? Depends (TM). Try finding a permanent sp

Re: plea to sponsees about announcing location of packages

On Tuesday 25 July 2006 11:46, martin f krafft wrote: > I am sure you've heard about dget: pass it a .dsc file and it will > download the source package. This is vastly better than having to > browse to a directory and select the files by hand. > > Thus I kindly ask all sponsees to always include t

Re: plea to sponsees about announcing location of packages

On Tuesday 25 July 2006 13:16, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > Matthew Palmer написа: > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 10:46:47AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > >> Matthew, could we please add this to the FAQ? > > > > It shall be done. I'll also note about dget (which is a little-known > > tool, I think). > >

Re: plea to sponsees about announcing location of packages

On Tuesday 25 July 2006 13:54, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 13:30 +0200, Christoph Haas wrote: > > I'm open to suggestions. The importer that processes uploaded packages > > just takes into account the *.dsc and *.changes files AFAIK. None of > >

Re: plea to sponsees about announcing location of packages

On Thursday 27 July 2006 12:28, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.07.27.1124 +0100]: > > > Or just dget > > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main//pkg.dsc > > > > > > instead of the paragraph speaking about "apt-get source". > > > > What's

Re: plea to sponsees about announcing location of packages

On Thursday 27 July 2006 13:30, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote: > martin f krafft wrote: > > also sprach Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.07.27.1150 +0100]: > >> If you are sponsoring packages that's just a one-time action. Then > >> sponsorees can tell

Re: RFS: sitebar (updated package)

On Saturday 29 July 2006 20:55, George Danchev wrote: > Seems like -mentors is running old version of lintian, since this has > been dealt with For security support reasons the mentors server runs on Sarge currently. > Wishlist to -mentors web interface: please print the version of lintian > you

Re: Jabbin packages now available, need fixing+sponsor

On Thursday 03 August 2006 23:11, Andrew Donnellan wrote: > I've built some packages which are now being hosted on the Jabbin > website/SF.net. They aren't the best ever (I just hacked the Psi > version of debian/rules) and they're certainly not policy-compliant > (yet). > > I tried uploading to me

Re: Jabbin packages now available, need fixing+sponsor

On Friday 04 August 2006 18:31, Stefan Potyra wrote: > Am Freitag 04 August 2006 13:16 schrieb Christoph Haas: > > [If anyone has an idea how to run lintian from a Python program and > > having it controlled by a timeout I'd be glad. No idea why lintian > > hangs for a da

Re: Jabbin packages now available, need fixing+sponsor

On Friday 04 August 2006 22:29, Russ Allbery wrote: > Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [If anyone has an idea how to run lintian from a Python program and > > having it controlled by a timeout I'd be glad. No idea why lintian > > hangs for a day.] >

Re: RFS: jabbin

On Tuesday 15 August 2006 03:43, Andrew Donnellan wrote: > Is anyone interested in sponsoring this package? I'm happy to fix any > problems and I'm in close contact with upstream. I just took a look at the package. Various thoughts: - the orig.tar.gz that you provide differs in some places from t

Re: RFS: KildClient - Powerful MUD client with a built-in Perl interpreter

On Sunday 13 August 2006 14:19, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kildclient". Looks good. Uploaded. Cheers Christoph -- ~ ~ ".signature" [Modified] 1 line --100%--1,48 All -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a sub

Re: [RFS] listen - A nice music player and manager for GNOME

Hi, Julien... On Sunday 13 August 2006 13:51, Julien Valroff wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor to upload the listen package. > [...] > I would be happy to receive your comments. The package looks good to me although I don't speak CDBS. I just wonder why there is no menu item showing up in KDE

Re: RFS: yorick (updated package; fixes FTBFS on powerpc and obsolescence)

Hello, Thibaut... On Thursday 10 August 2006 17:46, Thibaut Paumard wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.1.01cvs20060706-1 > of the package "yorick", which I am adopting. The version currently in > the archive is obsolete and FTBFS with GCC 4.2 on powerpc (#367895). Okay, I'v

Re: RFS: yorick (updated package; fixes FTBFS on powerpc and obsolescence)

On Wednesday 16 August 2006 18:21, Thibaut Paumard wrote: > Le mercredi 16 août 2006 à 16:56 +0200, Christoph Haas a écrit : > > Version jump: > > The version currently in Debian is 1.5.14. Is it really necessary > > to use the CVS version instead of the last stable 2.1.01

Re: RFS: oggfwd -- a basic icecast source client for audio and video streaming

On Tuesday 15 August 2006 10:49, Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "oggfwd". Alright. Uploaded. Cheers Christoph -- ~ ~ ".signature" [Modified] 1 line --100%--1,48 All -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subjec

Re: RFS: yorick (updated package; fixes FTBFS on powerpc and obsolescence)

On Wednesday 16 August 2006 21:09, Thibaut Paumard wrote: > Le mercredi 16 août 2006 à 20:37 +0200, Christoph Haas a écrit : > > > #include "testg.i"; > > > > grtest;SYNTAX: syntax error near #include "testg. > > SYNTAX: missing close " > >

Re: [RFS] listen - A nice music player and manager for GNOME

On Tuesday 15 August 2006 23:38, Julien Valroff wrote: > Le mardi 15 août 2006 à 20:13 +0200, Christoph Haas a écrit : > > On Sunday 13 August 2006 13:51, Julien Valroff wrote: > > > I am looking for a sponsor to upload the listen package. > > > [...] > > &

Re: RFS: aria2

On Saturday 19 August 2006 10:46, Patrick Ruckstuhl wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "aria2". I volunteer. - What is debian/test good for? - Your debian/watch file works well. It just told me that there is a version 0.7.2. :) Apart from that the package is ready to be sponsor

Re: Policy question for mentors.debian.net

Hi, Jeremiah... On Wednesday 23 August 2006 21:39, Jeremiah Foster wrote: > I would like to say that I am very impressed by mentors.debian.net. It > is easy to use and visually appealing. Thank you. I like our work, too. :) > I am working with a sponsor on behalf of an upstream software develope

Re: RFS: aria2 [uploaded]

On Thursday 24 August 2006 05:09, Patrick Ruckstuhl wrote: > I updated and this version now also works with the libares version in > debian, so now the ares2 also supports async dns. Very well. Thanks for the package. Looks okay and is uploaded. Cheers Christoph -- ~ ~ ".signature" [Modified] 1

Please tell if you found a sponsor

Dear package maintainers... a sponsor of Debian packages today sent an email to the mentors.debian.net support email address and I would like to forward the suggestion here. Please tell us if you found a sponsor. I often found myself downloading and testing packages from mentors.debian.net and

Re: RFS: xdiskusage [uploaded]

Hi, Thierry... On Saturday 26 August 2006 06:19, Thierry Randrianiriana wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.48-6 > of my package "xdiskusage". Good to see you adopted the package. > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Be glad. Cheers Christoph -- ~

Re: Please tell if you found a sponsor

A little update on the matter: We are testing a feature on mentors.debian.net where we monitor the debian-devel-changes@ lists (thanks to those who gave the hint on #debian-devel) and remove packages from the mentors repository once it has been accepted in 'unstable'. That will at least avoid c

Re: RFS: nta

On Tuesday 29 August 2006 22:36, Luca Bigliardi wrote: > At the beginning i thought about a config script to ask the user for > the list of interfaces, but then it seemed to me a little overkill. > What do you think? I admit that I don't understand the application very well. But running the "nta"

Re: RFS: msntp -- A very simple and portable SNTP client/server for UNIX [uploaded]

On Sunday 27 August 2006 19:30, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "msntp". > > It builds these binary packages: > msntp - A very simple and portable SNTP client/server for UNIX I'm not completely happy with the description and second what Matej Vela wr

Re: RFS: aria2 [uploaded]

On Friday 01 September 2006 09:01, Patrick Ruckstuhl wrote: > there seemed to be a problem that in some way it was possible, that it > linked against openssl instead of gnutls (although gnutls was > prefered), I now changed it to explicitely disable linking against > openssl (and I also sent a mail

Re: RFS: msntp -- A very simple and portable SNTP client/server for UNIX [uploaded]

On Friday 01 September 2006 22:37, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: > Christoph Haas wrote: > > On Sunday 27 August 2006 19:30, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: > >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "msntp". > >> > >> It builds these binary packages

Re: RFS: aria2 [uploaded]

On Friday 01 September 2006 22:13, Patrick Ruckstuhl wrote: > Christoph Haas wrote: > > - please do not remove old debian/changelog entries. You already > > closed the bug reports in the 0.7.2 version > > I thought because the package was rejected it is still the first &g

Re: flexbackup 'grave' Bug Resolved

On Saturday 02 September 2006 16:35, Kurt B. Kaiser wrote: > I've ITA'd flexbackup: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=384184 > > I've fixed its RC bug, present in stable: unsafe use of temp files. > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=334350 > > The package has other p

Re: RFS: lopster

Hi, Francesco... On Friday 01 September 2006 14:00, Francesco Namuri wrote: > I'm looking for a sponsor to adopt "lopster" package, it's orphaned (bug > #366006). This is my first attempt to make a debian package, but I'm a > lot motivated to contribute to the debian development. Very good. Thank

Re: RFS: page-crunch [sponsored]

On Thursday 31 August 2006 17:27, Sylvain Beucler wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.9-1 > of my package "page-crunch". Looks good. Uploaded. > PS: I'll post a follow-up after the package is sponsored this time :) No need to. :) My mini-complaint was directed at people w

Re: RFS: aria2 [sponsored again]

On Saturday 02 September 2006 20:19, Patrick Ruckstuhl wrote: > >>> - please do not remove old debian/changelog entries. You already > >>> closed the bug reports in the 0.7.2 version > >> > >> I thought because the package was rejected it is still the first > >> upload (and therefore the first ch

Re: RFS: msntp -- A very simple and portable SNTP client/server for UNIX [uploaded]

On Sunday 03 September 2006 01:29, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: > Christoph Haas wrote: > > Your package is already uploaded. > > I didn't get any email from debian ftp-master and this package doesn't > appear on my QA page. Are you sure to have uploaded it ? ;-) I ple

Re: RFS: cscope (updated package) [sponsored]

On Saturday 02 September 2006 21:13, Tobias Klauser wrote: > On 2006-09-02 at 19:19:43 +0200, Tobias Klauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > OK. I'll make a package with a new snapshot then. With the benefit > > that there needn't be a debian/patches. > > The updated package based on a CVS snapshot

Re: RFS: lopster (updated package)

On Sunday 03 September 2006 00:13, Francesco Namuri wrote: > On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 07:54:05PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote: > > Also strange that I can't find an entry in my KDE start menu. I had > > expected it under Debian->Applications->Network but it's not th

Re: flexbackup 'grave' Bug Resolved

On Sunday 03 September 2006 08:08, Kurt B. Kaiser wrote: > Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> The package for stable-security is available at > >> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/flexbackup > > > > So far so good. But your pack

Re: RFS: lopster (updated package) [sponsored]

On Sunday 03 September 2006 12:33, Francesco Namuri wrote: > On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 09:20:48AM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote: > > But please do not put them into the upstream's directory. > > Fixed, :) > now everything is in debian/ directory, and the patch of src/log.c is &g

Re: flexbackup 'grave' Bug Resolved

On Sunday 03 September 2006 18:30, Kurt B. Kaiser wrote: > Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Please run lintian on the package. I get three errors here. > > Yes, I see that also. However, I'm trying to follow the directive in > the Developer's Refe

Re: RFS: lopster (updated package) [sponsored]

On Sunday 03 September 2006 16:10, Francesco Namuri wrote: > thanks very much for sponsorship... :) You're welcome. > It's strange because I have the desktop entry in debian menu and in > KDE/gnome menus too, I have purged and reinstalled many times the > package to verify this... Now I check if

Re: RFS: lopster (updated again) [sponsored^2]

On Tuesday 05 September 2006 12:25, Francesco Namuri wrote: > On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 08:29:44PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote: > > Also look out for "dh_desktop" which will do valuable things like > > telling KDE the menu has changed > > I've made anot

Re: RFS: isomd5sum (formerly anaconda) [uploaded]

On Friday 15 September 2006 18:11, James Westby wrote: > On (14/09/06 15:15), Ryan Finnie wrote: > > isomd5sum_11.1.0.95-1 has been updated in-place. Removed .cvsignore, > > added md5.c information to debian/copyright, removed unnecessary > > current maintainer line from debian/copyright. James,

Re: RFS: museek+ -- daemon and clients for the Soulseek p2p network

On Saturday 16 September 2006 12:22, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "museek+". I don't know why but the upstream tarball I just downloaded from http://puzzle.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/museek-plus/museek+-0.1.11.tar.bz2 differs in several places from

Re: RFS: museek+ -- daemon and clients for the Soulseek p2p network

On Saturday 16 September 2006 14:20, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: > Christoph Haas wrote: > > On Saturday 16 September 2006 12:22, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: > >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "museek+". > > > > I don't know why bu

Re: What to do with word documents ?

Hi, Charles... On Sunday 17 September 2006 12:19, Charles Plessy wrote: > I am working on a package which contains MSWord documents. I was > wondering the following questions: > > 1) How can I know if they are redistributable at all, for instance if > they contain non-free fonts? In the worst case

Re: question about reporting bugs on my own package

On Monday 18 September 2006 16:30, Satoru Takeuchi wrote: > I have a problem with bug reporting. I maintain a package and found some > bugs with it. Is it correct way to report bugs on my own package, or > should I just fix these bugs and describe about it on changelog? I > briefly read Debian Deve

Re: RFS: msntp -- A very simple and portable SNTP client/server for UNIX [new package to fix policy break]

On Tuesday 19 September 2006 11:38, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: > The current version in unstable may creates files in /etc/. I filled an > RC bug to avoid migration in testing. > > The new package is available, could you upload it Christoph ? Alright, done. Christoph -- ~ ~ ".signature" [Modi

Re: Changing version numbers for upload to m.d.n [ was: Re: RFS: swish++: A Simple Web Indexing System for Humans --- C++ version ]

On Thursday 21 September 2006 14:29, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.09.21.1419 +0200]: > > The convention is, I believe, that an upload to mentors.debian.net > > does not count as a release, as anyone who downloads a package > > from there should realis

Re: RFS: xexec (updated package) [uploaded]

On Friday 22 September 2006 21:12, holoturoide wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.3-24 > of my package "xexec". I just uploaded the package. > It builds these binary packages: > trueprint - pretty printing of source code No idea where you got that from. But it doesn't b

Re: RFS: Tunapie

Hi, James... On Sunday 24 September 2006 11:39, James Stone wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tunapie". Comments on the package: debian/copyright... - should contain the years of copyright like "Copyright (C) 2002-2006 John Doe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" - should contain more than

Re: RFS: png2html (updated package)

On Sunday 24 September 2006 02:33, Jack Grahams wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1-5 > of my package "png2html" (This package was previously orphaned). Regarding debian/patches/01_makefilefix.dpatch: Wouldn't it be easier if you installed the files into the appropriate lo

Re: RFS: gtksee (updated package)

On Tuesday 26 September 2006 00:01, holoturoide wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.5.6-3 > of my package "gtksee". I wonder why these files were changed in the .diff.gz: --- gtksee-0.5.6.orig/po/cat-id-tbl.c --- gtksee-0.5.6.orig/po/gtksee.pot --- gtksee-0.5.6.orig/man/Make

Re: RFS: tunapie

On Friday 29 September 2006 22:01, James Stone wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tunapie". I have just created > a new upstream version with a few minor changes, and a new debian > package. Uploaded. Christoph -- ~ ~ ".signature" [Modified] 1 line --100%--1,48

Re: RFS: mp3cd

On Saturday 30 September 2006 22:14, Kees Cook wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mp3cd". > > * Package name: mp3cd > Version : 1.25-1 > Upstream Author : Kees Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * URL : http://outflux.net/software/pkgs/mp3cd/ > * License

Re: RFS: BMPx

On Sunday 01 October 2006 13:48, Thierry Randrianiriana wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bmpx". The package doesn't build here in pbuilder: checking mp4.h usability... no checking mp4.h presence... no checking for mp4.h... no configure: error: mp4.h header missing make: *** [co

Re: RFS: BMPx

On Sunday 01 October 2006 16:03, Thierry Randrianiriana wrote: > Hi Christoph, > > Fixed, sorry 'libmp4v2-dev' missed in Build-Depends . Hmmm -> Considering libmp4v2-dev -> Trying libmp4v2-dev -> Cannot install libmp4v2-dev; apt errors follow: Reading package lists... Done Buildin

Re: RFS: mp3cd

On Sunday 01 October 2006 19:00, Kees Cook wrote: > On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 01:14:15PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote: > > On Saturday 30 September 2006 22:14, Kees Cook wrote: > > > It builds these binary packages: > > > mp3cd - Implements MP3 CD Burning HOWTO >

Re: How can I contribute??

Eduardo, On Tuesday 24 October 2006 17:08, eduardo.oliva barruzi wrote: > Hi mentor, I joined this list to make some needed work to the project. > If any of you knows something that I can help, please let me know, cause > I really want to join. > > I have expert skills in PHP, good skills in Shell

Re: RFS: mp3cd

On Sunday 22 October 2006 19:28, Kees Cook wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.25.1-2 of my package > "mp3cd". Uploaded. Christoph -- Famous coworker quote: "I'm still confused - just on a higher level now." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject o

Re: Regarding Requested packages

On Saturday 02 December 2006 12:15, Eng. Mina Ramses wrote: > Regarding the Requested > packagescan I freely > with no restrictions select any request to package it and what > are the steps I have to follow to package this request. Yes, you are free t

Re: Opinions on CDBS amongst sponsors

On Monday 11 December 2006 11:25, Neil Williams wrote: > What are the problems with CDBS (apart from debian/control automation)? Generally I am not a fan of layers of abstraction once the abstraction is too abstract. Frameworks are great as long as they do what you expect. But if they fail to do

Re: RFS: medit

On Thursday 05 April 2007 22:12, Arthur Loiret wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "medit". > > * Package name: medit > Version : 0.8.3~b20070223 > Upstream Author : Yevgen Muntyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * URL : http://mooedit.sourceforge.net/ > * License

Re: RFS: sympy

On Sunday 08 April 2007 18:14, Ondrej Certik wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sympy". > > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sympy I just downloaded your package from mentors.d.n and found that the orig.tar.gz d

Re: RFS template request

On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 10:45:15PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > Could the long description(s) be isolated from the .diff.gz and added to > the RFS template? > > I find this level of description quite useless: > > > Section : net > > > > It builds these binary packages: > > packeth-

Re: RFS template request

On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 02:56:23PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote: > Hallo Christoph, > > * Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-27 14:29]: > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 10:45:15PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > [...] > > > The same content would also be

Re: RFS: lastfm (updated package)

On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 09:48:43PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * John Stamp [Sun, 22 Apr 2007 09:57:33 -0700]: > > > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lastfm/lastfm_1:1.1.3.0-1.dsc > > I've seen stanzas like this in most RFS. Are they autogenerated in some > way? If so, the code nee

Re: RFS: QGFE -- Qt Gnuplot front end -- should be mature now

On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 04:23:34PM +0200, Giorgio Pioda wrote: > the time has come to search for a sponsorship to upload qgfe (sid and > backports I would propose). > > Qgfe is surely not the best GUI for a CLI program but in case of gnuplot > is the only one available (actually there is also an o

Re: problems with mentors.debian.net mailserver

On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 08:49:25PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote: > OoO En cette aube naissante du lundi 25 juin 2007, vers 07:00, "Michael > Gilbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > > > hello, > > i tried to sign up for a mentors account today > > (http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/maintainer-signup

Re: problems with mentors.debian.net mailserver

On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 12:17:50PM +0200, Francesco Namuri wrote: > I'm trying to send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but I get a > bounce from the mailer daemon. Right. I have a workaround installed now. But somehow the otrs is borked. Working on it... Christoph signature.asc Description: Digit

Re: RFS: alien-arena - First person online deathmatch shooter

Andres, On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 07:49:01PM -0400, Andres Mejia wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "alien-arena". I have looked at your package. It looks good and is working. I would just suggest you shorten the texts in debian/copyright and debian/control to less than 80 character

Re: RFS: powertop (updated package)

On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 05:21:03PM +0200, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.7~svn-r227-1 > of my package "powertop". Sponsored! Is there a reason you took the SVN version instead of 1.7 stable? Funny though that uscan found out there is a 1.17 version o

Re: A note on lintian clean packages and mentors.d.n

On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 06:11:00PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote: > I saw many packages using the template from > mentors.debian.net which then always says: > "The package is lintian clean." > > And I saw many packages which are not lintian clean but > state otherwise which really sucks. Can you chang

Re: A note on lintian clean packages and mentors.d.n

On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 07:21:51PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote: > Hi, > * Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-01 19:13]: > > On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 06:11:00PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote: > > > I saw many packages using the template from > > > mento

Re: A note on lintian clean packages and mentors.d.n

On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 02:39:10PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > On 01/07/07, Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 07:21:51PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote: > >> Hi, > >> * Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-01 19:13]: &g

Re: RFS: command-not-found

On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 10:08:47PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "command-not-found". > > * Package name: command-not-found > Version : 0.2.4+debian-1 > Upstream Author : Zygmunt Krynicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Re: RFS: alien-arena - First person online deathmatch shooter

On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 12:11:33AM -0400, Andres Mejia wrote: > On 6/29/07, Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I have looked at your package. It looks good and is working. I would > >just suggest you shorten the texts in debian/copyright and > >debian/control

Re: Broken uploads to mentors.debian.net

On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 10:42:52PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > Just had a problem with a package for sponsoring that, AFAICT, could > not happen with other repositories that I use, so I'm a tad concerned > about how it happened on m.d.n. > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xracer/ >

Re: Change in my sponsorship requirements

On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 12:41:16PM +0200, Bart Martens wrote: > On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 11:45 +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > > I make use of > > the new ~ character in version strings. Even more my own packages, > > I'll release > > > > 1.0-1~unreleased.1 > > 1.0-1~unreleased.2 > > 1.0-1~unre

Re: Broken uploads to mentors.debian.net

On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 12:31:29AM +0200, I wrote: > On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 10:42:52PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > > Just had a problem with a package for sponsoring that, AFAICT, could > > not happen with other repositories that I use, so I'm a tad concerned > > about how it happened on m.d.n.

Re: Broken uploads to mentors.debian.net

On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 10:30:39PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 22:41:57 +0200 > Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 12:31:29AM +0200, I wrote: > > > On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 10:42:52PM +0100, Neil Williams w

Re: Nagios version

David, please use your real email address. workaround.org is a domain hosted by myself and I'm pretty positive I didn't give you a freedotfr hostname in that domain. Christoph -- Peer review means that you can feel better because someone else missed the problem, too. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

<    1   2   3   >