dput only .dsc file is uploaded .

2012-01-17 Thread Alex Mestiashvili
Hi All , I run into a problem with package upload to mentors . It seems to me that only dsc file is uploaded . I've recently uploaded a new version of my package libpam-abl and after upload noticed that QA information section had many error messages . The problem was that time on my lxc containe

Re: dput only .dsc file is uploaded .

2012-01-17 Thread Daniel Martí
Make sure the .orig.tar.gz and .debian.tar.gz are correctly named, and if you are just doing a debian update (e.g. upstream.version-2) make sure to build the package with dpkg-buildpackage -sa. Then, dput mentors *.changes should do the trick. Alex Mestiashvili wrote: >Hi All , > >I run into

Re: Re: RFS: libapache2-mod-rpaf

2012-01-17 Thread Sergey B Kirpichev
> On 16.01.2012 23:57, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote: >> For example, that was not "a very first upload" (of mod_rpaf) for me. >> But next time I should convince new sponsor and so on. > > That's unfortunate, but this happens. I'm sorry for you, and I made > similar experiences. It's just too common to

Re: dput only .dsc file is uploaded .

2012-01-17 Thread Alex Mestiashvili
Dear Daniel , Thank you a lot , it helped ! Alex On 01/17/2012 10:04 AM, Daniel Martí wrote: > Make sure the .orig.tar.gz and .debian.tar.gz are correctly named, and > if you are just doing a debian update (e.g. upstream.version-2) make > sure to build the package with dpkg-buildpackage -sa. Then

Re: RFS: shaarli

2012-01-17 Thread Arno Töll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On 16.01.2012 23:30, Paul Wise wrote: > Much better would be to depend on the Debian > package of jQuery and use that. Indeed. But that's a simple change, since upstream uses an unmodified third party source now. - -- with kind regards, Arno T

Re: How to handle software which needs huge modification when packaging for Debian

2012-01-17 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi! Am 17.01.2012 02:55, schrieb Adam Borowski: > Even binaries that don't have their sources in this package but are > shipped somewhere else in Debian are ok. Sorry, but written that way it is wrong.. Or at least could be interpreted wrong. For _everything_ Debian ships in main we must have t

Re: RFS: shaarli

2012-01-17 Thread Emilien Klein
Hi Paul, 2012/1/16 Paul Wise : > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Emilien Klein wrote: > >> I've worked with upstream Shaarli to fix the issue with the inclusion >> of the minified jQuery files. Upstream has released a tarball that >> uses the jQuery CDN instead of the local minified files (which

Re: How mature is Pkg-format 3.0 (git), yet?

2012-01-17 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Mon, January 16, 2012 23:26, Paul Wise wrote: >> I just wanted to ask how mature Package-format 3.0 (git) became until >> now. > > It is not currently accepted by the Debian archive: > > http://bugs.debian.org/642801 My experience until now is that it's mature in dpkg. It does the job just like

Re: Re-review request/RFS for current packaging of Red Eclipse

2012-01-17 Thread Martin Erik Werner
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 09:47 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 6:37 AM, Martin Erik Werner wrote: > > > Hello again, upstream has now released Red Eclipse 1.2 and hence this is > > partly a RFS, partly a re-review request. > ... > > [1] > > Is this motivation good enough for not usin

Re: RFS: libapache2-mod-rpaf

2012-01-17 Thread Boris Pek
>>> For example, that was not "a very first upload" (of mod_rpaf) for me. >>> But next time I should convince new sponsor and so on. >> That's unfortunate, but this happens. I'm sorry for you, and I made >> similar experiences. > > It's just too common to be "the default route". > >> I know wh

RFS: tupi -- 2D Animation design and authoring tool

2012-01-17 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
Dear mentors, I'm still looking for a sponsor for package "tupi". # Tupi: 2D Magic is a design and authoring tool for digital artists interested in 2D Animation, offering an interface experience focused on 8-100 years old kids. It's source code is based on the KTooN project. . Some of it

Re: RFS: parcellite 1.0.2~rc5-1 (updated package)

2012-01-17 Thread Andrew Starr-Bochicchio
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote: > On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 6:45 AM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: >> Andrew Starr-Bochicchio writes: >>> Sigh... Any one feel giving me a Christmas present? Still builds in a >>> clean sid chroot, still is lintian clean, and still fixes a

Re: RFS: dmaths

2012-01-17 Thread Innocent De Marchi
Hi Jakub, >s/rule/rules/ in debian/changelog. I am sorry; I don't understand this phrase >I have a feeling that the new description is not (much) better than the >old one. Could you please ask at debian-l10n-engl...@lists.debian.org >for a review? OK. I

Re: Re: RFS: dmaths

2012-01-17 Thread Innocent De Marchi
Hi Daniel, Thank you very much for your help. I have sent a message to the list and I already have response (http://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-english/2012/01/msg00052.html) Regards! I. De Marchi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubsc

Package fails to build on i386 with "undefined reference to"

2012-01-17 Thread Carlos Borroto
Hi all, My name is Carlos Borroto. I recently joined Debian Med's team to help packaging several bioinformatics tools. I ran into a problem I would like get help on. I'm working in a tool named TopHat[1]. It builds correctly on amd64: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/89809979/buildlog_ubuntu-oneiri

Re: Package fails to build on i386 with "undefined reference to"

2012-01-17 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Carlos Borroto , 2012-01-17, 13:45: I'm working in a tool named TopHat[1]. It builds correctly on amd64: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/89809979/buildlog_ubuntu-oneiric-amd64.tophat_1.4.0-1~oneiric2_BUILDING.txt.gz But fails on i386: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/89813979/buildlog_ubuntu-onei

Re: Package fails to build on i386 with "undefined reference to"

2012-01-17 Thread Carlos Borroto
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Carlos Borroto , 2012-01-17, 13:45: > >> I'm working in a tool named TopHat[1]. It builds correctly on amd64: >> >> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/89809979/buildlog_ubuntu-oneiric-amd64.tophat_1.4.0-1~oneiric2_BUILDING.txt.gz >> >> But fails o

Re: Package fails to build on i386 with "undefined reference to"

2012-01-17 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Carlos Borroto] > g++ -Wall -Wno-strict-aliasing -march=i686 -O3 -g -O2 -DNDEBUG > -I/usr/include/seqan -Wall -Wno-strict-aliasing -march=i686 -O3 -g -O2 > -DNDEBUG -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -L/usr/lib -o gtf_to_fasta > GTFToFasta.o FastaTools.o ../src/libtophat.a libgc.a -lbam -lz -lz > GTFToFa

Re: Package fails to build on i386 with "undefined reference to"

2012-01-17 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Peter Samuelson] > What appears to be happening is that "config.h" wants to define some > stuff that affects how the off_t data type is interpreted, but this > fails to happen if you include certain system headers before you define > the LFS symbols (I'm talking about the _LARGE_FILES and _FILE_O

Re: Package fails to build on i386 with "undefined reference to"

2012-01-17 Thread Carlos Borroto
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Peter Samuelson wrote: > > [Peter Samuelson] >> What appears to be happening is that "config.h" wants to define some >> stuff that affects how the off_t data type is interpreted, but this >> fails to happen if you include certain system headers before you define >>

proposed new pseudo-package 'debian-mentors' for handling sponsoring requests

2012-01-17 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
SUMMARY === We plan to ask for the creation of a new pseudo-package debian-mentors or mentors.debian.org [3] (contact: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org) in Debian's bug tracking system (the name is still subject to change). A workflow for handling sponsoring requests is proposed below. It is ba

Re: RFS: quickrdp

2012-01-17 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Jakub Wilk , 2012-01-15, 16:49: There are some warnings from dpkg-shlibdeps: dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libwx_gtk2u_aui-2.8.so.0 could be avoided if "debian/quickrdp/usr/bin/quickrdp" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols). dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: de

Re: proposed new pseudo-package 'debian-mentors' for handling sponsoring requests

2012-01-17 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:59:14PM +0100, Ansgar Burchardt a écrit : > SUMMARY > === > > We plan to ask for the creation of a new pseudo-package > debian-mentors or mentors.debian.org [3] (contact: > debian-mentors@lists.debian.org) in Debian's bug tracking system (the > name is still subject

Re: RFS: dmaths

2012-01-17 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Innocent De Marchi , 2012-01-17, 18:48: s/rule/rules/ in debian/changelog. I am sorry; I don't understand this phrase There's a typo in Debian changelog: you should replace "rule" with "rules". I have a feeling that the new description is not (much) better than the old one. Could you ple

Re: Packaging proprietary software

2012-01-17 Thread Ivan Reche
Thanks for the tips. It seems like a nice solution. Where do I find good documentation for the creation of binary packages? I couldn't find much material about it, except for an old tutorial ( http://tldp.org/HOWTO/html_single/Debian-Binary-Package-Building-HOWTO/). Can someone recommend me a Deb

Re: Packaging proprietary software

2012-01-17 Thread Ivan Reche
2012/1/18 Ivan Reche > Thanks for the tips. It seems like a nice solution. > > Where do I find good documentation for the creation of binary packages? I > couldn't find much material about it, except for an old tutorial ( > http://tldp.org/HOWTO/html_single/Debian-Binary-Package-Building-HOWTO/).

RFS: dwb

2012-01-17 Thread Nathan Owens
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dwb". * Package name: dwb Version : 2011.10.29-2 Upstream Author : Stefan Bolte * URL : http://bitbucket.org/portix/dwb * License : GPL-3 Section : net This would close bug #656145 re

Re: RFS: oss-compat (RC bug fix)

2012-01-17 Thread Stephen Kitt
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 08:41:35 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Paul Wise wrote: > > I note that the package is installable on hurd-*. AFAICT Hurd doesn't > > support sound or Alsa so maybe it should not depend on 'hurd' or > > should switch to architecture linux-any (or li

Re: RFS: couriergrey (3rd)

2012-01-17 Thread Marco Balmer
Dear Gergely, On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:38:55AM +0100, Gergely Nagy wrote: > Marco Balmer writes: > > Dear Gergely, debian-mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "couriergrey". > Will have a look this week. Sorry for the delays. Thank you! - I just updated again the package. d

Re: proposed new pseudo-package 'debian-mentors' for handling sponsoring requests

2012-01-17 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Tue, 17 Jan 2012, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > We plan to ask for the creation of a new pseudo-package > debian-mentors or mentors.debian.org [3] (contact: > debian-mentors@lists.debian.org) in Debian's bug tracking system (the > name is still subject to change). A workflow for handling sponso