[2008-07-29 10:18] Richard Hurt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Since I'm not running Sid on any of my machines, I had
> the though of using VirtualBox on my Ubuntu machine to create a clean
> Sid build environment. Does this make sense?
I was in the same situation some month ago and used cowdancer/
I am getting this error from lintian
N: This package contains an embedded copy of the JQuery, Prototype,
N: Mochikit or "Cropper" JavaScript libraries that are now available in
N: their own packages. Please depend on the appropriate package and
N: symlink the library into the appropriate
Hello,
I have sent RFS for this package twice, and have not gotten any bit of
feedback yet. Can anyone at least point me to what i am missing ?
thank you,
Kaido Kert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2008/7/29 Richard Hurt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I am just getting started in Debian package building and I need to know if
> this idea is valid or if there is a better way.
> [...]
> What do you use?
I find pbuilder easiest to work with. Since I am mostly running
Testing, I have two setups, one fo
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Charliej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have contacted upstream about this error, and he states that he would not
> want to depend on the prototype package in debian because he has made
> changes to the version of prototype he is currently using.
Please ask him to
"Paul Wise" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Charliej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I have contacted upstream about this error, and he states that he
> > would not want to depend on the prototype package in debian
> > because he has made changes to the version of
[2008-07-30 10:51] Jens Peter Secher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 2008/7/29 Richard Hurt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I am just getting started in Debian package building and I need to know if
> > this idea is valid or if there is a better way.
> > [...]
> > What do you use?
>
> I find pbuilder easiest to w
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 10:04:35AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Richard Hurt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
*SKIP*
> > Also, the wide array of tools available to me is pretty
> > overwhelming. pBuilder, cowbuilder, cowdancer, quilt, etc... The
> > list is quite long and I'm not sure which one is old, n
If a package has been uploaded to NEW, but has not been yet approved or
rejected by ftp-masters, and if this package has a mistake that is
better to be corrected before the package gets into unstable, then what
is the official procedure of doing such correction?
--
Stanislav
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> If a package has been uploaded to NEW, but has not been yet approved or
> rejected by ftp-masters, and if this package has a mistake that is
> better to be corrected before the package gets into unstable, then what
> is the official procedure of doing such correction?
On Tuesday 29 July 2008, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Stefanos Harhalakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.07.28.1250 +0200]:
> > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vbackup/vbackup_0.1.6pre1-1.
> >dsc
> debian/control:
> Build-Depends-Indep: autotools-dev
> I don't like if packages
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 13:50:10 Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> If a package has been uploaded to NEW, but has not been yet approved or
> rejected by ftp-masters, and if this package has a mistake that is
> better to be corrected before the package gets into unstable, then what
> is the official pr
Tobias Quathamer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You can send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and ask them to REJECT your
> package now, without doing further checks and then upload again. You
> can even re-use the same version number then.
Though there's no good reason I can see to re-use a release
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 15:11, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tobias Quathamer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> You can send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and ask them to REJECT your
>> package now, without doing further checks and then upload again. You
>> can even re-use the same version
also sprach Stefanos Harhalakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.07.30.1345 +0200]:
> Include a comparison of vbackup with other software in the package
> description? Somehow I don't find this right. I believe that it is
> a moving target that may imply false things regarding other
> packages at some poi
Hello again,
My sponsor asked me to delete versioned build dependency on
debhelper. I had it in the form "debhelper (>= 5)" and changed
it to just "debhelper". I am wondering if this is right.
In debian/compat I put "5".
--
Stanislav
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
Le Wednesday 30 July 2008 20:22:18 Stanislav Maslovski, vous avez écrit :
> Hello again,
Hi !
> My sponsor asked me to delete versioned build dependency on
> debhelper. I had it in the form "debhelper (>= 5)" and changed
> it to just "debhelper". I am wondering if this is right.
>
> In de
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 15:11, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Tobias Quathamer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> You can send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and ask them to REJECT your
> >> package now, without doing further checks and then upl
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, markus schnalke wrote:
> When I configured pbuilder some time ago, I couldn't manage to use
> different locations than /var/cache/pbuilder when using
> cowdancer/cowbuilder with it.
You set BASEPATH instead of BASETGZ (or use --basepath instead of
--basetgz).
Don Armstrong
[Kaido Kert, 2008-07-30]
> I have sent RFS for this package twice, and have not gotten any bit of
> feedback yet. Can anyone at least point me to what i am missing ?
I'd say it's due to this md5sum problem (.dsc file points to different
upstream sources tarball). If not, then most probably there
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 08:30:15PM +0200, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> Le Wednesday 30 July 2008 20:22:18 Stanislav Maslovski, vous avez écrit :
> > Hello again,
>
> Hi !
>
> > My sponsor asked me to delete versioned build dependency on
> > debhelper. I had it in the form "debhelper (>= 5)" and
THanks
I take this for the synopsis
>web-based bookmark manager
--
Carlos Eduardo Sotelo Pinto ( KrLoS )
Free and OpenSource Software Developer
GNULinux Registered User #379182
GNULinux Registered Machine #277661
GNULinux Arequipa Users Group||Debian Arequipa Users Group
--
subkeys.pgp.net
Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (30/07/2008):
> > Because it never reach the archive, so it's better to keep the same
> > version for a REJECTED package: jumping revision is useless.
>
> There's no reason not to increment the version. You've made a release,
> and have made changes to that releas
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (30/07/2008):
> > There's no reason not to increment the version. You've made a
> > release, and have made changes to that release. Whether it
> > actually hits the archive is immaterial. You just build with the
> > app
Stanislav Maslovski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My sponsor asked me to delete versioned build dependency on debhelper.
I think this is bad advice.
> I had it in the form "debhelper (>= 5)" and changed it to just
> "debhelper". I am wondering if this is right.
>
> In debian/compat I put "5".
I
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 02:14:53PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Stanislav Maslovski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > My sponsor asked me to delete versioned build dependency on debhelper.
>
> I think this is bad advice.
I agree. There are people building Debian packages on older releases,
and havi
"Sandro Tosi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 15:11, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [T]here's no good reason I can see to re-use a release number
> > after it's uploaded.
>
> Because it never reach the archive, so it's better to keep the same
> version for a REJEC
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 00:33, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Sandro Tosi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 15:11, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > [T]here's no good reason I can see to re-use a release number
>> > after it's uploaded.
>>
>> Because it ne
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Because it doesn't add any information for the end users,
Sure it does. It tells end users what was changed in between the
REJECT and the new upload. Eliding this means that it's no longer
possible to trivially tell what was changed between uploads.[1]
>
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 01:07, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> Because it doesn't add any information for the end users,
>
> Sure it does. It tells end users what was changed in between the
> REJECT and the new upload. Eliding this means that it
[2008-07-30 12:39] Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, markus schnalke wrote:
> > When I configured pbuilder some time ago, I couldn't manage to use
> > different locations than /var/cache/pbuilder when using
> > cowdancer/cowbuilder with it.
>
> You set BASEPATH instead of BA
31 matches
Mail list logo
