On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Sandro Tosi wrote: > On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 15:11, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Tobias Quathamer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >> You can send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and ask them to REJECT your > >> package now, without doing further checks and then upload again. You > >> can even re-use the same version number then. > > > > Though there's no good reason I can see to re-use a release number > > after it's uploaded. > > Because it never reach the archive, so it's better to keep the same > version for a REJECTED package: jumping revision is useless.
There's no reason not to increment the version. You've made a release, and have made changes to that release. Whether it actually hits the archive is immaterial. You just build with the appropriate -v option, and you're done. Moreover, a new revision makes it easier for everyone to follow what had changed between a version which was reviewed by the ftpmasters and the next version that was uploaded. There's nothing magical about the -1 version number. Don Armstrong -- She was alot like starbucks. IE, generic and expensive. -- hugh macleod http://www.gapingvoid.com/Moveable_Type/archives/001376.html http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
