Hi,
I'm currently packaging the Barcode Writer in Pure PostScript project
that I have written. This is my first attempt at creating a source
package which I have created by following the Debian New Maintainers
Guide.
Would people please examine the package and tell me what problems
exist. You can
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 09:53:51AM +0100, Terry Burton wrote:
> Hi,
Hello,
> Would people please examine the package and tell me what problems
> exist. You can view the files at
> http://www.terryburton.co.uk/barcodewriter/files/debiansrc
After a very brief look, I can only say I saw a lot of co
On 06-Sep-2005, Terry Burton wrote:
> I'm currently packaging the Barcode Writer in Pure PostScript
> project that I have written.
Yay! I like this program, thanks.
> Debian Policy mandates that programs have a manpage. Since this is a
> PostScript resource (similar to a shared library) does this
Hi,
> After I have got the source package into good shape, do you have any
> advise on finding a package sponser? Any volunteers.
If you don't find a sponsor, have a read of womble's excellent
debian-mentors FAQ[0] (recently updated) and add your sponsorship
request to sponsors.debian.net so it d
Hello all,
I am trying to package qingy (qingy.sf.net) for which there are 2 RFPs
- 309672 and 236706 - in BTS for a looong time.
I have tried it on my system and seems ok, although there seems to be
some kind of race condition in the code resulting in a deadlock if the
user changes the tty back
Terry Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Would people please examine the package and tell me what problems
> exist. You can view the files at
> http://www.terryburton.co.uk/barcodewriter/files/debiansrc
The debian/rules is very bloated, please remove everything which is not
needed and not mandat
Hi,
I've removed the Makefile and made use of dh_install. I've also
slimmed the debian/rules file by removing the commented lines and dh_*
rules that seem redundant, as suggested. I would appreciate it if
someone could offer any assistance in further tidying this up.
It is now also building for A
Hi,
> Hi,
>
> I've removed the Makefile and made use of dh_install. I've also
> slimmed the debian/rules file by removing the commented lines and dh_*
> rules that seem redundant, as suggested. I would appreciate it if
> someone could offer any assistance in further tidying this up.
Generally, you
Okay, next round :-)
Please recheck files at
http://www.terryburton.co.uk/barcodewriter/files/debiansrc.
Target is now /usr/share/libpostscriptbarcode, not
/usr/lib/libpostscriptbarcode.
Created debian/install file to simplify debian/rules.
Added -X option to dh_installdocs to prevent compression
Hi,
As I understand, that's php-xml-util, php-xml-serializer
(http://pear.php.net/package/XML_Serializer/), php-soap and php-cache.
Yes
Which other package? Which horde3 version?
php-services-weather require these packages,, and horde3 require this
one.
Horde3 run whitout php-
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 01:10:11PM +0300, Eddy Petri?or wrote:
> Hello all,
Good morning,
> - if I add dh_shlibdeps to the build then I have a warning during the
> build of the package - something about misc libs not being defined and
> some nasty errors during installation, but the package instal
Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could someone else also comment on how applications should deal with
> shared libraries which are not intended to be used by other programs?
If they aren't used by other programs, there's no need to produce a
library. Perhaps it's convienient to create
Hi,
sorry for this, but I think another round might be required:
1. move sample.ps, barcode_with_sample.ps, docs/* from debian/install to
debian/docs.
2. I think you should just remove the Depends line (as far as I understand
the thing you could just "cat barcode_with_sample.ps > /dev/lp0" and it
Hi,
Thanks for all of your assistance Eric.
New files available at
http://www.terryburton.co.uk/barcodewriter/files/debiansrc.
Documentation files moved from debian/install to debian/docs.
Depends removed.
I would prefer not to have to regenerate the documentation from TeX
for the timebeing sin
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 05:56:54PM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote:
> Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Could someone else also comment on how applications should deal with
> > shared libraries which are not intended to be used by other programs?
>
> If they aren't used by other programs,
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote on 06/09/2005 12:29:
> There is no Debian package without a Depends line,
> as you always need something else to properly use it.
This is not true. For an example look at busybox-static gcc-4.0-base or
libc6:
aptitude show busybox-static gcc-4.0-base libc6
cu,
sven
Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 05:56:54PM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote:
>> Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > Could someone else also comment on how applications should deal with
>> > shared libraries which are not intended to be used by other progra
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Symbol versions are transparent to the application, but when present
> at build time the linker binds references to that symbol to the
> specified symbol version -- this allows the runtime linker to
> distinguish between two different functions with the
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 07:18:17PM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote:
> Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 05:56:54PM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote:
> >> Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Could someone else also comment on how applications should deal wi
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> There is no Debian
> package without a Depends line, as you always need something else to
> properly use it.
Actually, there are over 1500 of them. Some packages survive with the
Essentials :)
$ grep-dctrl -c -FDepends -e '^$' \
>/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.jyu.fi_debi
On Mon, 2005-09-05 at 21:31 +0100, Mark Seaborn wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[]
> I think I understand the semantics of ELF versioned symbols, but I
> don't really understand why they are supposed to be useful.
>
> For example, glibc has two versions of "chown", GLIBC_2.1 (th
Hello,
I want to adopt grace6[1].
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/307358
I rebuild grace6[2], lintian and linda clean. I have upload it to
mentors.debian.net[3].
[2] attachment: grace6_5.99.0+final-7_i386.changes
[3] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/grace6/
maybe you also like to look a
I would prefer not to have to regenerate the documentation from TeX
for the timebeing since it relies on TeX modules that are not yet part
of Debian. Hopefully future Debian releases of the PSTricks packages
will remedy this situation making this a sensible option. It would
also seem a bit overk
Package: grace6
Severity: grave
Version: 5.99.0+final-7
Christoph Berg schrieb:
> Re: Li Daobing in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>>I want to adopt grace6[1].
>>
>>[1] http://bugs.debian.org/307358
>>
>>I rebuild grace6[2], lintian and linda clean. I have upload it to
>>mentors.debian.net[3].
>
>
> Hi,
Torsten Werner wrote:
Package: grace6
> Severity: grave
> Version: 5.99.0+final-7
>
> Christoph Berg schrieb:
>
>>Re: Li Daobing in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>>I want to adopt grace6[1].
>>>
>>>[1] http://bugs.debian.org/307358
>>>
>>>I rebuild grace6[2], lintian and linda clean. I have upload it
25 matches
Mail list logo
