On Tuesday 25 January 2005 20.00, Antonio Ognio wrote:
> Saludos,
Please respect that debian-mentors is an english mailing list.
babelfishized:
=
I was reorganizing a little wiki of Debian-Peru:
http://www.debianperu.org/wiki/the idea to arm our own "planet" with blogs
is good and I believ
Hi, I have previously posted on this mailing list to ask for someone
to get interested in my packages, without any response, hope I'll get
more chance this time.
all packages can be found on http://cxhome.ath.cx/debian
I've made them with debhelper, following the guide provided on the
debian de
Hi,
I have create a package for the last version of Skype.
Skype is a program that allow you to phone by Internet. You can phone for free
to others Skype users and you can paid to call on phone. The rate of call are
low.
The BIG problem is that Skype is not opensource. The company just allow to
d
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> I have create a package for the last version of Skype.
> Skype is a program that allow you to phone by Internet. You can phone for free
> to others Skype users and you can paid to call on phone. The rate of call are
> low.
>
> The BIG problem is that Skype is n
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 05:45:46PM +0100, Frank K?ster wrote:
> No, it cannot go into Debian, and if its a binary I wouldn't even want
> it in non-free (because we cannot give any security support). What you
> could do would be to create a package that downloads the skype binary
> and creates a deb
Hi,
I have debianized alsa-tools and am looking for a sponsor.
From the source package is two binary packages built, one with gui
tools, called alsa-tools-gui, and the other is called alsa-tools.
I would also like some help in testing the packages, since I don't have
access to the needed hardware
--- Mikael Magnusson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I have debianized alsa-tools and am looking for a
> sponsor.
What is the status of alsa-tools being in Debian
legally? Rather, what is debian-legal's stance on
these packages? Since the firmware has been separated
out into upstream's alsa-firmware,
Niv Altivanik (Debian) wrote, On 01/26/2005 06:14 AM:
[3]Glurp is a gtk2.4+ client for the MPD music player daemon.
I didn't fill an ITP on Glurp because there already is a
maintainer for MPD related and i feel he should just take
my package as a work relief.
Did
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 19:40:05 +0100, Dan Chen wrote:
> What is the status of alsa-tools being in Debian
> legally? Rather, what is debian-legal's stance on
> these packages? Since the firmware has been separated
> out into upstream's alsa-firmware, there shouldn't be
> any problems, but it's never t
Hello there,
I was a user of slackware and SuSE for years, and in the last 6 months
I have changed completely to Debian and I am still amazed with the
apt/dpkg package management system.
So I went to learn how to do a .deb :)
I choose one app that I use often and followed and readed all
debian.o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At the moment, I'm currently developing packaging for "fahclient", a
distributed client for the [EMAIL PROTECTED] project. The binary is available
from their website and it unredistributable. "fahclient" works by
downloading the file from upstream and p
Hi
Would someone be willing to sponsor a package i've built?
The package is called bustle and is distributed under the GPL, i'm
also the author of bustle.
Short Description: to do list manager utilising weights to sort items
Long Description: Bustle is a unique to do list manager in that you
can
Dan Chen wrote:
--- Mikael Magnusson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I have debianized alsa-tools and am looking for a
sponsor.
What is the status of alsa-tools being in Debian
legally? Rather, what is debian-legal's stance on
these packages? Since the firmware has been separated
out into upstream's als
Fred Strauss wrote, On 01/26/2005 05:41 PM:
The package can be downloaded from
http://www.strider.co.za/bustle_0.1.5-1_i386.deb
People in this list will be interested in getting the source package and
compiling it themselves. Please provide links to the dsc, orig and diff
files.
K.
--
.''`.
>BTW... I'm getting a 404 on the address you provided for download.
Sorry, all the packages paths are wrong,
so you can have them all respectively:
skippy: http://cxhome.ath.cx/debian/skippy/
glurp: http://cxhome.ath.cx/debian/glurp/
gcursor: http://cxhome.ath.cx/debian/gcursor/
Sorry again, s
Jose de Paula Eufrasio Junior wrote, On 01/26/2005 05:27 PM:
Any help will be welcome.
A bit more of information on your package would be nice. License?
Upstream? Check the archive to see how other people send their RFS
mails. The "debian-mentors FAQ"[1] is also a good source of info.
Description:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 17:50:38 -0300, Lucas Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fred Strauss wrote, On 01/26/2005 05:41 PM:
>
> > The package can be downloaded from
> > http://www.strider.co.za/bustle_0.1.5-1_i386.deb
>
> People in this list will be interested in getting the source package and
> comp
I demand that Adrian von Bidder may or may not have written...
> On Tuesday 25 January 2005 20.00, Antonio Ognio wrote:
>> Saludos,
> Please respect that debian-mentors is an english mailing list.
> babelfishized:
Er... turned into a Babel fish? ;-)
[snip]
--
| Darren Salt | nr. Ashington,
Jose de Paula Eufrasio Junior wrote on 26/01/2005 21:27:
http://couve.no-ip.org/~coredump/packages/ps2client/
Already looks pretty good. A few notes however:
1) debian/copyright
Please list the full URL to the upstream homepage. Though
I have not checked it, I assume that ps2dev.org contains
Hello!
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 10:14:50PM +0100, Sven Mueller wrote:
> Jose de Paula Eufrasio Junior wrote on 26/01/2005 21:27:
> >http://couve.no-ip.org/~coredump/packages/ps2client/
>
> Already looks pretty good. A few notes however:
>
> 1) debian/copyright
Furthermore this file doesn't conta
Hello!
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 11:04:19PM +0200, Fred Strauss wrote:
> http://www.strider.co.za/bustle_0.1.5-1.diff.gz
Hmmm, I can't see how you need to build-depend on apt-build. The whole
Build-Deps:-line seems to be just the output of that code snippet from
the new maintainers guide, please tr
Niv Altivanik (xaiki) wrote, On 01/26/2005 05:53 PM:
Sorry, i miss-expressed myself, I meant that I don't feel like
maintaining the package under my name but, propose to maintain it for
this maintainer when other debian developers have approved the package
quality.
Sorry, I still don't understand.
I haven't contacted the mpd/gmpc official Debian Developer, my idea
was to have my package tested and approved and then ask him if he was
interested in maintaining the package, but you are right, mpd, gmpc
and glurp are different softwares.
I'd be really excited to maintain this package for the De
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 10:14:32AM +0100, Niv Altivanik wrote:
> Hi, I have previously posted on this mailing list to ask for someone
> to get interested in my packages, without any response, hope I'll get
> more chance this time.
I'm surpised, I thought I remembered a response.
> they are all
I noticed that Tomboy has already been marked as being worked on, but it
has been stale for 130 days. I have been maintaining a package for my
own use and have been trying to clean it up for inclusion in Debian. I
was unsure if I should post another ITP for it, since there are already
2 ITPs listed
25 matches
Mail list logo
