RFS: libetpan - a mail handling library

2004-05-24 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
Hello. While trying to build Opie environment for my ipaq handheld, I came through libetpan library (http://libetpan.sf.net). This library is required to build Opie. I don't like to have anything installed not in deb format; and there are currently no packages for libetpan in Debian archive. So I

Re: RFS: PennMUSH - #3

2004-05-24 Thread Brian Nelson
Ervin Hearn III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, > > It's been a month since I've last poked at this thread, but I > would once more like to ask if anyone would take a look at my > PennMUSH package and possibly consider sponsoring it. I have > kept it up to date with upstream releases, and tha

Re: RFS: leo -- a literate editor with outlines for X-Window

2004-05-24 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 08:04:05PM +0100, Xavier Antoviaque wrote: > Hello, > > I try to use the convention proposed by Rob Bradford a few weeks ago. > > Package name: leo > Version : 3.10 > License : Python licence > Upstream Author : Edward K. Ream <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Upst

Re: RFS: leo -- a literate editor with outlines for X-Window

2004-05-24 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 10:08:51PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 08:04:05PM +0100, Xavier Antoviaque wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I try to use the convention proposed by Rob Bradford a few weeks ago. > > > > Package name: leo > > Version : 3.10 > > License

Re: RFS: leo -- a literate editor with outlines for X-Window

2004-05-24 Thread Xavier Antoviaque
On Mon, 24 May 2004 22:08:51 +0200 Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Some remarks, not that I'm not a Debian Developer (yet), but before > leo can be included in Debian, these issues need to be resolved anyway Thanks for your reply, its helps a lot. I repackaged leo, I hope it s

Re: RFS: leo -- a literate editor with outlines for X-Window

2004-05-24 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 12:24:16AM +0200, Xavier Antoviaque wrote: > On Mon, 24 May 2004 22:08:51 +0200 > Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Some remarks, not that I'm not a Debian Developer (yet), but before > > leo can be included in Debian, these issues need to be resolved a

/etc/init.d/ script policy violation?

2004-05-24 Thread David Krovich
I have a question. If an /etc/init.d script hangs indefinately while waiting for user input, is this a violation of Debian policy? See BTS #221751 for more information.

RFS: libetpan - a mail handling library

2004-05-24 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
Hello. While trying to build Opie environment for my ipaq handheld, I came through libetpan library (http://libetpan.sf.net). This library is required to build Opie. I don't like to have anything installed not in deb format; and there are currently no packages for libetpan in Debian archive. So I

Re: RFS: PennMUSH - #3

2004-05-24 Thread Brian Nelson
Ervin Hearn III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, > > It's been a month since I've last poked at this thread, but I > would once more like to ask if anyone would take a look at my > PennMUSH package and possibly consider sponsoring it. I have > kept it up to date with upstream releases, and tha

Re: RFS: leo -- a literate editor with outlines for X-Window

2004-05-24 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 08:04:05PM +0100, Xavier Antoviaque wrote: > Hello, > > I try to use the convention proposed by Rob Bradford a few weeks ago. > > Package name: leo > Version : 3.10 > License : Python licence > Upstream Author : Edward K. Ream <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Upst

Re: RFS: leo -- a literate editor with outlines for X-Window

2004-05-24 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 10:08:51PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 08:04:05PM +0100, Xavier Antoviaque wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I try to use the convention proposed by Rob Bradford a few weeks ago. > > > > Package name: leo > > Version : 3.10 > > License

Re: RFS: leo -- a literate editor with outlines for X-Window

2004-05-24 Thread Xavier Antoviaque
On Mon, 24 May 2004 22:08:51 +0200 Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Some remarks, not that I'm not a Debian Developer (yet), but before > leo can be included in Debian, these issues need to be resolved anyway Thanks for your reply, its helps a lot. I repackaged leo, I hope it s

Re: RFS: leo -- a literate editor with outlines for X-Window

2004-05-24 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 12:24:16AM +0200, Xavier Antoviaque wrote: > On Mon, 24 May 2004 22:08:51 +0200 > Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Some remarks, not that I'm not a Debian Developer (yet), but before > > leo can be included in Debian, these issues need to be resolved a

/etc/init.d/ script policy violation?

2004-05-24 Thread David Krovich
I have a question. If an /etc/init.d script hangs indefinately while waiting for user input, is this a violation of Debian policy? See BTS #221751 for more information. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: PPPoE and Portslave

2004-05-24 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 08:09:43AM -0500, larry wrote: > To Whom it may concern > My Name is Larry Sheetz > I'm a Co owner in a Debian based ISP. > > We are currently deploying wireless systems for our isp and noticed that > there is on debian package that we can find that includes PPPoE in > Po

RFC: gtklp-0.9s

2004-05-24 Thread Zak B. Elep
Hi! debian/rules! Let me refer you to the Debian Bugs Page, at http://bugs.debian.org. Currently there are 11 bugs that should be addressed; actually they should have been closed/fixed years ago (thanks to the old maintainer :) Of Particular Interest is #157399 which add a button to launch gtklpq

Re: /etc/init.d/ script policy violation?

2004-05-24 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 09:40:52PM -0400, David Krovich wrote: > I have a question. If an /etc/init.d script hangs indefinately while > waiting for user input, is this a violation of Debian policy? > > See BTS #221751 for more information. There is no explicit rule in policy about the interacti

Re: /etc/init.d/ script policy violation?

2004-05-24 Thread Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
On Tuesday 25 May 2004 03.40, David Krovich wrote: > I have a question. If an /etc/init.d script hangs indefinately while > waiting for user input, is this a violation of Debian policy? My server not booting up to the point where ssh is running and accepting logins means a 2h journey to get ther

Re: RFC: gtklp-0.9s

2004-05-24 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2004-05-24 "Zak B. Elep" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > gtklp (0.9s-1) unstable; urgency=low [...] > * Rebuilt gtklp against libcupsys2-gnutls10 in experimental (Closes: > #249494) This does not work. You cannot upload a package which links and buidld-depends on a library in experimen

Re: RFC: gtklp-0.9s

2004-05-24 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2004-05-25 Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2004-05-24 "Zak B. Elep" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > > gtklp (0.9s-1) unstable; urgency=low > [...] > > * Rebuilt gtklp against libcupsys2-gnutls10 in experimental (Closes: > > #249494) [...] > You can upload gtklp to expe