On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 08:52:46PM +0100, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
> Until now I've been preparing pure-gpl version of mplayer as advised by
> debian-legal, and that version have been sent to Andrea. Now that divx4
> problem have been resolved, I can drop that tree and send the real thing;)
Caref
The buildd logs for my package, aplus-fsf, show a failure to build on the s390
due to a compile error. I logged on to trex and attempted to build it in the
unstable chroot. It built without error. Then I noticed that the error in
the buildd log referred to a file /usr/include/c++/3.2/backward/ne
Hello!
I'm a young french developer and user of debian (linux is my great passion)
I'd like to work (and so learn it)on the maintaining of packages.So, i think
it's a good way to go into the project and learn.
Tell me if it is possible and what i have to do! and how!
thank you very much
si
samuel desseaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello!
>
> I'm a young french developer and user of debian (linux is my great passion)
>
> I'd like to work (and so learn it)on the maintaining of packages.So, i think
> it's a good way to go into the project and learn.
> Tell me if it is possibl
Dear Mentors,
currently I'm preparing "Linux-SNA", found at www.linux-sna.org
to fit into some Debian packages.
Eduard Bloch ([EMAIL PROTECTED], CC:) and I, too, things this
could be matter of public interest.
So my question is: whats needed to get the packages verified
and uploaded?
Should I beco
You may be interested in taking over the fcron package when you become a
developer.
Having the upstream and the Debian maintainer in the same country wouldn't do
any harm, I don't plan on maintaining fcron long-term and I'm not sure
whether Henrique wants it back when I'm finished with it.
--
Hi Dariush
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 08:52:46PM +0100, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
> Hello,
> I am supposed to upload mplayer to debian, however there is quite a lagg
> between me and my sponsor (Andrea Mennucc), and some problems with
yes, it seems that sometimes the e-mail you send me or e-mail I
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Russell Coker wrote:
> You may be interested in taking over the fcron package when you become a
> developer.
>
> Having the upstream and the Debian maintainer in the same country wouldn't do
> any harm, I don't plan on maintaining fcron long-term and I'm not sure
> whether
Hello all,
I am maintaining a package that fails to build on alpha, hppa, and s390.
It appears that the problem is that those architectures use gcc/g++-3.0,
rather than 2.95, as the default compiler. The source would need to be
modified (not hugely, perhaps) to compile with gcc/g++-3.0.
This pac
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 12:08:53PM -0500, Stephen Gran wrote:
> I am maintaining a package that fails to build on alpha, hppa, and s390.
> It appears that the problem is that those architectures use gcc/g++-3.0,
> rather than 2.95, as the default compiler. The source would need to be
> modified (n
Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello all,
>
> I am maintaining a package that fails to build on alpha, hppa, and s390.
> It appears that the problem is that those architectures use gcc/g++-3.0,
> rather than 2.95, as the default compiler. The source would need to be
> modified (not hu
This one time, at band camp, Steve Langasek said:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 12:08:53PM -0500, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > I am maintaining a package that fails to build on alpha, hppa, and
> > s390. It appears that the problem is that those architectures use
> > gcc/g++-3.0, rather than 2.95, as the d
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 10:25:09AM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote:
> You could just change the Architecture: field in the control file to not
> attempt to build on the broken arches, for now.
Don't discriminate against architectures because of a temporary build
failure.
Steve Langasek
postmodern progr
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 01:25:08PM -0500, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > I believe the g++ migration is now the only thing we're waiting on for
> > KDE3.
> That was my understanding as well. Do you know the timeframe that this
> is expected to take?
Nope, I'm pretty well removed from the C++ stuff.
>
This one time, at band camp, Steve Langasek said:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 12:08:53PM -0500, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > The other question is, is this acceptable - that is, can I allow a build
> > failure on three architectures for a few {weeks,days}, or is that just
> > deemed too lazy? My personal
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 02:37:38PM -0500, Stephen Gran wrote:
> OK, last question, I swear 8^). The current version is kcdlabel_2.7-3.
> Upstream has named their port to KDE3 kcdlabel-2.7-KDE3, so how do I go
> about this? kcdlabel_2.7-KDE3-1? -4? Or something else like
> kcdlabel-KDE3_2.7-1 (a
Le Mercredi 30 Octobre 2002 16:07, Russell Coker a écrit :
Hello!
Thank you for the answer.
Yes, i would accept and do that with pleasure. Moreover, as my job let me free
time , there 's another packet, which i could take over:ivtools. I've
contacted the former maintainer : ivtools.He seems to
On Oct 30, Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> The default compiler on alpha is still gcc 2.95, to the best of my
> knowledge. If the autobuilders are using 3.x, this is not reflected in
> the default package layout for the architecture.
Where does one find the "default package layout
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 10:22:33PM -0500, Neil L. Roeth wrote:
> On Oct 30, Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > The default compiler on alpha is still gcc 2.95, to the best of my
> > knowledge. If the autobuilders are using 3.x, this is not reflected in
> > the default package layout
Hello,
Is there some way I can find out how many/which Debian Developers reside in a
particular area, in the interests of finding an advocate?
Thanks,
Levi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Levi Bard wrote:
> Is there some way I can find out how many/which Debian Developers
> reside in a particular area, in the interests of finding an
> advocate?
Uhm, you don't need to have physical contact with your advocate. All you
need to have physical con
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 10:24:03PM -0500, Levi Bard wrote:
> Hello,
> Is there some way I can find out how many/which Debian Developers reside in a
>particular area, in the interests of finding an advocate?
ldapsearch -P2 -x -h db.debian.org -b ou=Users,dc=debian,dc=org l=
From the ldap-ut
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> $ madison gcc|grep unstable
madison -s unstable gcc
--
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear Sir,
I am currently a student at ESIEC, the only post Graduate School of Packaging
Engineering in EUROPE (Reims University France). I would like to know if
there is any opportunity for a 5-month trainee ship (internship or co-op) in
your company (from July to November 2003).
This is the
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 08:52:46PM +0100, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
> Until now I've been preparing pure-gpl version of mplayer as advised by
> debian-legal, and that version have been sent to Andrea. Now that divx4
> problem have been resolved, I can drop that tree and send the real thing;)
Caref
The buildd logs for my package, aplus-fsf, show a failure to build on the s390
due to a compile error. I logged on to trex and attempted to build it in the
unstable chroot. It built without error. Then I noticed that the error in
the buildd log referred to a file /usr/include/c++/3.2/backward/ne
Hello!
I'm a young french developer and user of debian (linux is my great passion)
I'd like to work (and so learn it)on the maintaining of packages.So, i think
it's a good way to go into the project and learn.
Tell me if it is possible and what i have to do! and how!
thank you very much
si
samuel desseaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello!
>
> I'm a young french developer and user of debian (linux is my great passion)
>
> I'd like to work (and so learn it)on the maintaining of packages.So, i think
> it's a good way to go into the project and learn.
> Tell me if it is possibl
Dear Mentors,
currently I'm preparing "Linux-SNA", found at www.linux-sna.org
to fit into some Debian packages.
Eduard Bloch ([EMAIL PROTECTED], CC:) and I, too, things this
could be matter of public interest.
So my question is: whats needed to get the packages verified
and uploaded?
Should I beco
You may be interested in taking over the fcron package when you become a
developer.
Having the upstream and the Debian maintainer in the same country wouldn't do
any harm, I don't plan on maintaining fcron long-term and I'm not sure
whether Henrique wants it back when I'm finished with it.
--
Hi Dariush
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 08:52:46PM +0100, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
> Hello,
> I am supposed to upload mplayer to debian, however there is quite a lagg
> between me and my sponsor (Andrea Mennucc), and some problems with
yes, it seems that sometimes the e-mail you send me or e-mail I
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Russell Coker wrote:
> You may be interested in taking over the fcron package when you become a
> developer.
>
> Having the upstream and the Debian maintainer in the same country wouldn't do
> any harm, I don't plan on maintaining fcron long-term and I'm not sure
> whether
Hello all,
I am maintaining a package that fails to build on alpha, hppa, and s390.
It appears that the problem is that those architectures use gcc/g++-3.0,
rather than 2.95, as the default compiler. The source would need to be
modified (not hugely, perhaps) to compile with gcc/g++-3.0.
This pac
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 12:08:53PM -0500, Stephen Gran wrote:
> I am maintaining a package that fails to build on alpha, hppa, and s390.
> It appears that the problem is that those architectures use gcc/g++-3.0,
> rather than 2.95, as the default compiler. The source would need to be
> modified (n
Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello all,
>
> I am maintaining a package that fails to build on alpha, hppa, and s390.
> It appears that the problem is that those architectures use gcc/g++-3.0,
> rather than 2.95, as the default compiler. The source would need to be
> modified (not hu
This one time, at band camp, Steve Langasek said:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 12:08:53PM -0500, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > I am maintaining a package that fails to build on alpha, hppa, and
> > s390. It appears that the problem is that those architectures use
> > gcc/g++-3.0, rather than 2.95, as the d
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 10:25:09AM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote:
> You could just change the Architecture: field in the control file to not
> attempt to build on the broken arches, for now.
Don't discriminate against architectures because of a temporary build
failure.
Steve Langasek
postmodern progr
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 01:25:08PM -0500, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > I believe the g++ migration is now the only thing we're waiting on for
> > KDE3.
> That was my understanding as well. Do you know the timeframe that this
> is expected to take?
Nope, I'm pretty well removed from the C++ stuff.
>
This one time, at band camp, Steve Langasek said:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 12:08:53PM -0500, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > The other question is, is this acceptable - that is, can I allow a build
> > failure on three architectures for a few {weeks,days}, or is that just
> > deemed too lazy? My personal
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 02:37:38PM -0500, Stephen Gran wrote:
> OK, last question, I swear 8^). The current version is kcdlabel_2.7-3.
> Upstream has named their port to KDE3 kcdlabel-2.7-KDE3, so how do I go
> about this? kcdlabel_2.7-KDE3-1? -4? Or something else like
> kcdlabel-KDE3_2.7-1 (a
Le Mercredi 30 Octobre 2002 16:07, Russell Coker a écrit :
Hello!
Thank you for the answer.
Yes, i would accept and do that with pleasure. Moreover, as my job let me free
time , there 's another packet, which i could take over:ivtools. I've
contacted the former maintainer : ivtools.He seems to
On Oct 30, Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> The default compiler on alpha is still gcc 2.95, to the best of my
> knowledge. If the autobuilders are using 3.x, this is not reflected in
> the default package layout for the architecture.
Where does one find the "default package layout
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 10:22:33PM -0500, Neil L. Roeth wrote:
> On Oct 30, Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > The default compiler on alpha is still gcc 2.95, to the best of my
> > knowledge. If the autobuilders are using 3.x, this is not reflected in
> > the default package layout
Hello,
Is there some way I can find out how many/which Debian Developers
reside in a particular area, in the interests of finding an advocate?
Thanks,
Levi
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Levi Bard wrote:
> Is there some way I can find out how many/which Debian Developers
> reside in a particular area, in the interests of finding an
> advocate?
Uhm, you don't need to have physical contact with your advocate. All you
need to have physical con
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 10:24:03PM -0500, Levi Bard wrote:
> Hello,
> Is there some way I can find out how many/which Debian Developers
> reside in a particular area, in the interests of finding an advocate?
ldapsearch -P2 -x -h db.debian.org -b ou=Users,dc=debian,dc=org l=
From the ldap-u
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> $ madison gcc|grep unstable
madison -s unstable gcc
--
James
47 matches
Mail list logo
