On Sat, 17 Aug 2002 17:58:21 +0100, Paul Cupis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Friday 16 August 2002 23:27, Marc Haber wrote:
>> Looks like I'll have to say goodbye to my practice of building in a
>> virgin changeroot, or that I'll have to modify my scripts to put the
>> upstream tarball where cvs-
At 8:49 +0200 8/18/02, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
>itz> Hi, how can I easily determine the host architecture string in a
>itz> maintainer script? dpkg-architecture is in the dpkg-dev package,
>itz> which I obviously cannot depend on. I could massage the output
>itz> of uname or arch, but that seems to
At 1:05 +0200 6/25/02, Oliver Kurth wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 03:42:25PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>>
>> On 24-Jun-2002 Oliver Kurth wrote:
>> > Hello!
>> >
>> > I have changed a package and made some files in
>>/etc/pcmcia/ip-{up,down}.d/
>> > obsolete. Since they are in /etc they a
On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 11:02:44AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> At 8:49 +0200 8/18/02, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> >The package uses a generic name for one of its configuration files. I
> >want to create a symlink from the generic name to the correct
> >(architecture-dependent) one.
>
> Could you t
On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 12:02:03PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> At 1:05 +0200 6/25/02, Oliver Kurth wrote:
> >In principle they have moved to another location, /etc/network/if-{up,down}.d,
> >and at the same I have greatly changed them. What happens if they are not
> >removed is that both of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 18 August 2002 09:11, Marc Haber wrote:
> So all I'll would have to is
> (1) cvs checkout my package in the right version for the target
> distribution
> (2) invoke pbuilder to build in a chroot of the target distribution?
>
> How does pbui
itz> The package uses a generic name for one of its configuration
itz> files. I >want to create a symlink from the generic name to the
itz> correct (architecture-dependent) one.
Geert> Could you tell us that makes sence?
Colin> It makes perfect sense if the package he's talking about is
Colin>
On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 07:14:18AM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> Colin> It makes perfect sense if the package he's talking about is
> Colin> Architecture: all.
>
> Colin> Personally I might be inclined to make the package
> Colin> Architecture: any in this case, though.
>
> I assume by this you
At 16:14 +0200 8/18/02, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
>itz> The package uses a generic name for one of its configuration
>itz> files. I >want to create a symlink from the generic name to the
>itz> correct (architecture-dependent) one.
>
>Geert> Could you tell us that makes sence?
Could you tell us
On Sun, 18 Aug 2002 14:57:22 +0100, Paul Cupis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Fair enough. Use whatever is best for you.
Thanks for pointing out pbuilder to me, and for the example which will
be in the archives for other people to learn.
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !!
Hi!
I uploaded a package (quick-lounge-applet) to unstable that sould have
gone to experimental (mostly due to a dependency on libpanel-applet2).
/me slaps himself fiercly
How can I try to clean this mess up?
Regards, Andy
--
Andreas Rottmann | Dru@ICQ| 118634484@ICQ | [EMAIL
On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 08:19:35PM +0200, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I uploaded a package (quick-lounge-applet) to unstable that sould have
> gone to experimental (mostly due to a dependency on libpanel-applet2).
>
> /me slaps himself fiercly
>
> How can I try to clean this mess up?
It'
> Rather at a tangent, but it appears from reading the archives of
> debian-newmaint that no NM has been accepted as a developer since week ending
> 12 May. Is this correct?
Just to offer a ray of hope, I was accepted yesterday (new id
[EMAIL PROTECTED], but doesn't yet appear in the maintainer
* Jonathan Oxer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-19 08:44]:
> Just to offer a ray of hope, I was accepted yesterday (new id
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], but doesn't yet appear in the maintainer list on the
> site).
Of courses not. You appear in the page of "Applicants" (which says
"If you have passed all ch
Hi !
I do not really understand why you are so angry. I was not particularly
anxious, neither agressive, I was not criticizing your work, just
explaining why some things were confusing to me, and trying to
understand why it was like it was.
"There has been some confusion about
On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 11:49:24PM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> Matt> Your question has already been answered, but why do you need
> Matt> this information in a maintainer script?
>
> The package uses a generic name for one of its configuration files. I
> want to create a symlink from the gene
itz> The package uses a generic name for one of its configuration
itz> files. I want to create a symlink from the generic name to the
itz> correct (architecture-dependent) one.
Matt> So the package is architecture: all, but uses different
Matt> configuration files for different architectures?
Devin Carraway wrote:
> This is a small Perl module I had need of during a recent project at
> work, but which wasn't in Debian.
>
> Essentially it provides the comparison indicating that (e.g.)
> 2.10.1pl1-8 is greater than 2.9.8.1-4. Small, simple, perl-only.
>
> Packages may be had from http
itz> Hi, how can I easily determine the host architecture string in a
itz> maintainer script? dpkg-architecture is in the dpkg-dev package,
itz> which I obviously cannot depend on. I could massage the output
itz> of uname or arch, but that seems too ugly (and I don't even know
itz> what all the
On Sat, 17 Aug 2002 17:58:21 +0100, Paul Cupis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Friday 16 August 2002 23:27, Marc Haber wrote:
>> Looks like I'll have to say goodbye to my practice of building in a
>> virgin changeroot, or that I'll have to modify my scripts to put the
>> upstream tarball where cvs-b
At 8:49 +0200 8/18/02, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
>itz> Hi, how can I easily determine the host architecture string in a
>itz> maintainer script? dpkg-architecture is in the dpkg-dev package,
>itz> which I obviously cannot depend on. I could massage the output
>itz> of uname or arch, but that seems too
At 1:05 +0200 6/25/02, Oliver Kurth wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 03:42:25PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>>
>> On 24-Jun-2002 Oliver Kurth wrote:
>> > Hello!
>> >
>> > I have changed a package and made some files in
>>/etc/pcmcia/ip-{up,down}.d/
>> > obsolete. Since they are in /etc they ar
On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 11:02:44AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> At 8:49 +0200 8/18/02, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> >The package uses a generic name for one of its configuration files. I
> >want to create a symlink from the generic name to the correct
> >(architecture-dependent) one.
>
> Could you te
On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 12:02:03PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> At 1:05 +0200 6/25/02, Oliver Kurth wrote:
> >In principle they have moved to another location,
> >/etc/network/if-{up,down}.d,
> >and at the same I have greatly changed them. What happens if they are not
> >removed is that both of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 18 August 2002 09:11, Marc Haber wrote:
> So all I'll would have to is
> (1) cvs checkout my package in the right version for the target
> distribution
> (2) invoke pbuilder to build in a chroot of the target distribution?
>
> How does pbuil
itz> The package uses a generic name for one of its configuration
itz> files. I >want to create a symlink from the generic name to the
itz> correct (architecture-dependent) one.
Geert> Could you tell us that makes sence?
Colin> It makes perfect sense if the package he's talking about is
Colin>
On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 07:14:18AM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> Colin> It makes perfect sense if the package he's talking about is
> Colin> Architecture: all.
>
> Colin> Personally I might be inclined to make the package
> Colin> Architecture: any in this case, though.
>
> I assume by this you m
At 16:14 +0200 8/18/02, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
>itz> The package uses a generic name for one of its configuration
>itz> files. I >want to create a symlink from the generic name to the
>itz> correct (architecture-dependent) one.
>
>Geert> Could you tell us that makes sence?
Could you tell us t
On Sun, 18 Aug 2002 14:57:22 +0100, Paul Cupis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Fair enough. Use whatever is best for you.
Thanks for pointing out pbuilder to me, and for the example which will
be in the archives for other people to learn.
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !!
Hi!
I uploaded a package (quick-lounge-applet) to unstable that sould have
gone to experimental (mostly due to a dependency on libpanel-applet2).
/me slaps himself fiercly
How can I try to clean this mess up?
Regards, Andy
--
Andreas Rottmann | [EMAIL PROTECTED]| [EMAIL PROTECT
On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 08:19:35PM +0200, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I uploaded a package (quick-lounge-applet) to unstable that sould have
> gone to experimental (mostly due to a dependency on libpanel-applet2).
>
> /me slaps himself fiercly
>
> How can I try to clean this mess up?
It's
> Rather at a tangent, but it appears from reading the archives of
> debian-newmaint that no NM has been accepted as a developer since week ending
> 12 May. Is this correct?
Just to offer a ray of hope, I was accepted yesterday (new id
[EMAIL PROTECTED], but doesn't yet appear in the maintainer
* Jonathan Oxer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-19 08:44]:
> Just to offer a ray of hope, I was accepted yesterday (new id
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], but doesn't yet appear in the maintainer list on the
> site).
Of courses not. You appear in the page of "Applicants" (which says
"If you have passed all che
Hi !
I do not really understand why you are so angry. I was not particularly
anxious, neither agressive, I was not criticizing your work, just
explaining why some things were confusing to me, and trying to
understand why it was like it was.
"There has been some confusion about w
On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 11:49:24PM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> Matt> Your question has already been answered, but why do you need
> Matt> this information in a maintainer script?
>
> The package uses a generic name for one of its configuration files. I
> want to create a symlink from the gener
itz> The package uses a generic name for one of its configuration
itz> files. I want to create a symlink from the generic name to the
itz> correct (architecture-dependent) one.
Matt> So the package is architecture: all, but uses different
Matt> configuration files for different architectures? W
Devin Carraway wrote:
> This is a small Perl module I had need of during a recent project at
> work, but which wasn't in Debian.
>
> Essentially it provides the comparison indicating that (e.g.)
> 2.10.1pl1-8 is greater than 2.9.8.1-4. Small, simple, perl-only.
>
> Packages may be had from http:
37 matches
Mail list logo
