On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 11:02:44AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: > At 8:49 +0200 8/18/02, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > >The package uses a generic name for one of its configuration files. I > >want to create a symlink from the generic name to the correct > >(architecture-dependent) one. > > Could you tell us that makes sence?
It makes perfect sense if the package he's talking about is Architecture: all. > Please don't add architecture dependencies in packages. As long as there is a fallback case for when the architecture isn't recognized, there is no problem. Personally I might be inclined to make the package Architecture: any in this case, though. -- Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
