Hello.
I'm going to package "The GTK+ Reference Documentation Project" (I'll post
ITP to debian-devel soon).
The problem I have is that there are two html-trees in gtk-reference --
one for gtk+ and another gdk, two index.html, and I want to put references
to both somewhere in http://localhost/d
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 10:08:13PM +0200, peter karlsson wrote:
> Hi!
>
> How do I get update-alternatives to keep information when upgrading a
> package?
>
> Currently I have postinst add it and prerm remove it, but if I set the
> alternative to point to something else than the default, this mea
On Wednesday 13 September 2000, at 17 h 37, the keyboard of Franklin Belew
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not sure if there is a page yet
http://www.internatif.org/bortzmeyer/debian/sponsor/
> but the steps are really simple,
Here's what you should do if you want to sponsor someone (you must
xxdiff, uses autoconf, which is looking for the C++ compiler. It finds c++
(which is a link into alternatives) and decides it's not g++.
The line in configure.in is:
AM_CONDITIONAL(IS_COMPILER_GCC, test x$CXX = xg++)
Does anybody else, that has packaged a autoconfigured c++ package have a
simp
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 12:19:28 +0200, T.Pospisek's MailLists wrote:
> xxdiff, uses autoconf, which is looking for the C++ compiler. It finds c++
> (which is a link into alternatives) and decides it's not g++.
[...]
> AM_CONDITIONAL(IS_COMPILER_GCC, test x$CXX = xg++)
How about
AC_PROG
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 04:23:29PM +0200, Michael Weber wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 12:19:28 +0200, T.Pospisek's MailLists wrote:
> > xxdiff, uses autoconf, which is looking for the C++ compiler. It finds c++
> > (which is a link into alternatives) and decides it's not g++.
> [...]
> > AM_CO
On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Michael Weber wrote:
> How about
>
> AC_PROG_CXX
> AM_CONDITIONAL(IS_COMPILER_GCC, test x$GXX = xyes)
>
> (Cf. autoconf manual)
Wow! Muchas gracias,
*t
Tomas Pospisek
How exacting should a sponsor be?
A sponsor was reamed on a list a while back because he duploaded
a package with a fairly minor error. He'd identified the problem
and told the packager to fix it in the next version and said that
this was his impression of what a sponsor should do. That is,
get
On 2914T102042-0700, Rick Younie wrote:
> Anyhow, ignore this specific example. I just mean in the general
> case. Get it close or flog the package until it squeaks?
Well, in the final analysis, it's the sponsor's neck on the line if
something bad happens. It's a matter of how much he trust
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 10:08:13PM +0200, peter karlsson wrote:
> Hi!
>
> How do I get update-alternatives to keep information when upgrading a
> package?
>
> Currently I have postinst add it and prerm remove it, but if I set the
> alternative to point to something else than the default, this me
On Wednesday 13 September 2000, at 17 h 37, the keyboard of Franklin Belew
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not sure if there is a page yet
http://www.internatif.org/bortzmeyer/debian/sponsor/
> but the steps are really simple,
Here's what you should do if you want to sponsor someone (you mus
xxdiff, uses autoconf, which is looking for the C++ compiler. It finds c++
(which is a link into alternatives) and decides it's not g++.
The line in configure.in is:
AM_CONDITIONAL(IS_COMPILER_GCC, test x$CXX = xg++)
Does anybody else, that has packaged a autoconfigured c++ package have a
sim
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 12:19:28 +0200, T.Pospisek's MailLists wrote:
> xxdiff, uses autoconf, which is looking for the C++ compiler. It finds c++
> (which is a link into alternatives) and decides it's not g++.
[...]
> AM_CONDITIONAL(IS_COMPILER_GCC, test x$CXX = xg++)
How about
AC_PRO
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 04:23:29PM +0200, Michael Weber wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 12:19:28 +0200, T.Pospisek's MailLists wrote:
> > xxdiff, uses autoconf, which is looking for the C++ compiler. It finds c++
> > (which is a link into alternatives) and decides it's not g++.
> [...]
> > AM_C
On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Michael Weber wrote:
> How about
>
> AC_PROG_CXX
> AM_CONDITIONAL(IS_COMPILER_GCC, test x$GXX = xyes)
>
> (Cf. autoconf manual)
Wow! Muchas gracias,
*t
Tomas Pospisek
How exacting should a sponsor be?
A sponsor was reamed on a list a while back because he duploaded
a package with a fairly minor error. He'd identified the problem
and told the packager to fix it in the next version and said that
this was his impression of what a sponsor should do. That is,
get
On 2914T102042-0700, Rick Younie wrote:
> Anyhow, ignore this specific example. I just mean in the general
> case. Get it close or flog the package until it squeaks?
Well, in the final analysis, it's the sponsor's neck on the line if
something bad happens. It's a matter of how much he trus
Hello.
I'm going to package "The GTK+ Reference Documentation Project" (I'll post
ITP to debian-devel soon).
The problem I have is that there are two html-trees in gtk-reference --
one for gtk+ and another gdk, two index.html, and I want to put references
to both somewhere in http://localhost/
18 matches
Mail list logo
