Re: pgp 2.6.3i vs pgp5i vs gnupgp

2003-03-31 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hi, On Fri, 21 Mar 2003 08:31:37 +, Roland Mas wrote: > Kevin Rosenberg (2003-03-20 12:40:17 -0700) : >> I do the same. Additionally, I use the Debian cryptoapi and cryptoloop >> kernel modules to encrypt the USB drive. I think the chance of losing >> such a portable, small device is significa

Re: pgp 2.6.3i vs pgp5i vs gnupgp

2003-03-31 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hi, On Fri, 21 Mar 2003 08:31:37 +, Roland Mas wrote: > Kevin Rosenberg (2003-03-20 12:40:17 -0700) : >> I do the same. Additionally, I use the Debian cryptoapi and cryptoloop >> kernel modules to encrypt the USB drive. I think the chance of losing >> such a portable, small device is significa

Re: pgp 2.6.3i vs pgp5i vs gnupgp

2003-03-21 Thread Roland Mas
Kevin Rosenberg (2003-03-20 12:40:17 -0700) : > Roland Mas wrote: >> It works flawlessly, and it allows me to have my GnuPG private >> key on exactly zero machine, only on this USB key thing (don't >> worry, I also have backups). I have recently added SSH to the same >> scheme. Protects me fro

Re: pgp 2.6.3i vs pgp5i vs gnupgp

2003-03-21 Thread Roland Mas
Kevin Rosenberg (2003-03-20 12:40:17 -0700) : > Roland Mas wrote: >> It works flawlessly, and it allows me to have my GnuPG private >> key on exactly zero machine, only on this USB key thing (don't >> worry, I also have backups). I have recently added SSH to the same >> scheme. Protects me fro

Re: pgp 2.6.3i vs pgp5i vs gnupgp

2003-03-20 Thread Kevin Rosenberg
Roland Mas wrote: > It works flawlessly, and it allows me to have my GnuPG private key > on exactly zero machine, only on this USB key thing (don't worry, I > also have backups). I have recently added SSH to the same scheme. > Protects me from thieves, although not from trojaning. I assessed th

Re: pgp 2.6.3i vs pgp5i vs gnupgp

2003-03-20 Thread Kevin Rosenberg
Roland Mas wrote: > It works flawlessly, and it allows me to have my GnuPG private key > on exactly zero machine, only on this USB key thing (don't worry, I > also have backups). I have recently added SSH to the same scheme. > Protects me from thieves, although not from trojaning. I assessed th

Re: pgp 2.6.3i vs pgp5i vs gnupgp

2003-03-18 Thread Roland Mas
Drew Scott Daniels (2003-03-17 16:05:50 -0600) : [...] > I've decided to carry a disk around with my key and have GnuPG on > all the various single user machines that I use. For what it's worth: I've been concerned with the physical security of the machines to which I have access, and I have fol

Re: pgp 2.6.3i vs pgp5i vs gnupgp

2003-03-18 Thread Roland Mas
Drew Scott Daniels (2003-03-17 16:05:50 -0600) : [...] > I've decided to carry a disk around with my key and have GnuPG on > all the various single user machines that I use. For what it's worth: I've been concerned with the physical security of the machines to which I have access, and I have fol

Re: pgp 2.6.3i vs pgp5i vs gnupgp

2003-03-17 Thread Chad Miller
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 04:05:50PM -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote: > How about for validation of PGP messages. Is the version on the solaris > system good enough for validation? [...] Yes, probably. > I've also found useful information at pgpi.org since my last post. It > seems that the IDEA alg

Re: pgp 2.6.3i vs pgp5i vs gnupgp

2003-03-17 Thread Drew Scott Daniels
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Chad Miller wrote: > On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 02:57:26PM -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote: > > I would like to setup a key to eventually be used for Debian related > > activities (the kind nm's need). I would like to use an existing version > > of pgp on a set of solaris systems

Re: pgp 2.6.3i vs pgp5i vs gnupgp

2003-03-17 Thread Chad Miller
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 02:57:26PM -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote: > I would like to setup a key to eventually be used for Debian related > activities (the kind nm's need). I would like to use an existing version > of pgp on a set of solaris systems I have access to, the problem is they > have PGP

pgp 2.6.3i vs pgp5i vs gnupgp

2003-03-17 Thread Drew Scott Daniels
Hi, I would like to setup a key to eventually be used for Debian related activities (the kind nm's need). I would like to use an existing version of pgp on a set of solaris systems I have access to, the problem is they have PGP version 2.6.3i. I'm unsure as to whether this is a secure version of PG

Re: pgp 2.6.3i vs pgp5i vs gnupgp

2003-03-17 Thread Chad Miller
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 04:05:50PM -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote: > How about for validation of PGP messages. Is the version on the solaris > system good enough for validation? [...] Yes, probably. > I've also found useful information at pgpi.org since my last post. It > seems that the IDEA alg

Re: pgp 2.6.3i vs pgp5i vs gnupgp

2003-03-17 Thread Drew Scott Daniels
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Chad Miller wrote: > On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 02:57:26PM -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote: > > I would like to setup a key to eventually be used for Debian related > > activities (the kind nm's need). I would like to use an existing version > > of pgp on a set of solaris systems

Re: pgp 2.6.3i vs pgp5i vs gnupgp

2003-03-17 Thread Chad Miller
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 02:57:26PM -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote: > I would like to setup a key to eventually be used for Debian related > activities (the kind nm's need). I would like to use an existing version > of pgp on a set of solaris systems I have access to, the problem is they > have PGP

pgp 2.6.3i vs pgp5i vs gnupgp

2003-03-17 Thread Drew Scott Daniels
Hi, I would like to setup a key to eventually be used for Debian related activities (the kind nm's need). I would like to use an existing version of pgp on a set of solaris systems I have access to, the problem is they have PGP version 2.6.3i. I'm unsure as to whether this is a secure version of PG