Steve Robbins:
> > copyright-file-contains-full-license might be better.
>
> I don't think that is better: sometimes the copyright file *should* be the
> full license.
>
> The only time it should NOT be, is if the copyright is one of those stored
> in /usr/share/common-licenses.
copyright-file-du
Steve Robbins:
> > copyright-file-contains-full-license might be better.
>
> I don't think that is better: sometimes the copyright file *should* be the
> full license.
>
> The only time it should NOT be, is if the copyright is one of those stored
> in /usr/share/common-licenses.
copyright-file-d
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 01:01:01PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
| >
| > I don't think that is better: sometimes the copyright file *should* be the
| > full license.
| >
| > The only time it should NOT be, is if the copyright is one of those stored
| > in /usr/share/common-licenses.
| >
|
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 01:01:01PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
| >
| > I don't think that is better: sometimes the copyright file *should* be the
| > full license.
| >
| > The only time it should NOT be, is if the copyright is one of those stored
| > in /usr/share/common-licenses.
| >
|
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 03:41:13PM -0500, Steve Robbins wrote:
> > copyright-file-contains-full-license might be better.
>
> I don't think that is better: sometimes the copyright file *should* be the
> full license.
How about copyright-file-contains-common-license?
--
André Dahlqvist <[EMAIL P
Steve Robbins wrote:
>
> On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>
> > * Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20001109 11:51]:
> > > > E: sntop: copyright-file-is-gpl
> > >
> > > What would you like this message to say instead?
> >
> > copyright-file-contains-full-license might be better.
>
> I don't think that is better: sometimes the copyright file *should* be the
> full license.
>
> The only time it should NOT be, is if the copyright is one of those stored
> in /usr/share/common-licenses.
>
from the lintian changelog
* copyright-file-is-gpl renamed to copyright-file-contain
* Steve Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20001109 15:41]:
> > copyright-file-contains-full-license might be better.
>
> I don't think that is better: sometimes the copyright file *should*
> be the full license.
In those cases, the warning won't be shown anyway.
However, what about: copyright-file-co
On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20001109 11:51]:
> > > E: sntop: copyright-file-is-gpl
> >
> > What would you like this message to say instead?
>
> copyright-file-contains-full-license might be better.
I don't think that is better: someti
* Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20001109 11:51]:
> > E: sntop: copyright-file-is-gpl
>
> What would you like this message to say instead?
copyright-file-contains-full-license might be better.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 09-Nov-2000 Fredrik Steen wrote:
> When I run lintian on my package i get the following output:
> E: sntop: copyright-file-is-gpl
>
> I read the manpage for lintian but didn't understand what it meant...
>
What would you like this message to say instead?
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 03:41:13PM -0500, Steve Robbins wrote:
> > copyright-file-contains-full-license might be better.
>
> I don't think that is better: sometimes the copyright file *should* be the
> full license.
How about copyright-file-contains-common-license?
--
André Dahlqvist <[EMAIL
Steve Robbins wrote:
>
> On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>
> > * Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20001109 11:51]:
> > > > E: sntop: copyright-file-is-gpl
> > >
> > > What would you like this message to say instead?
> >
> > copyright-file-contains-full-license might be better
>
> I don't think that is better: sometimes the copyright file *should* be the
> full license.
>
> The only time it should NOT be, is if the copyright is one of those stored
> in /usr/share/common-licenses.
>
from the lintian changelog
* copyright-file-is-gpl renamed to copyright-file-contai
* Steve Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20001109 15:41]:
> > copyright-file-contains-full-license might be better.
>
> I don't think that is better: sometimes the copyright file *should*
> be the full license.
In those cases, the warning won't be shown anyway.
However, what about: copyright-file-c
On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20001109 11:51]:
> > > E: sntop: copyright-file-is-gpl
> >
> > What would you like this message to say instead?
>
> copyright-file-contains-full-license might be better.
I don't think that is better: somet
* Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20001109 11:51]:
> > E: sntop: copyright-file-is-gpl
>
> What would you like this message to say instead?
copyright-file-contains-full-license might be better.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
On 09-Nov-2000 Fredrik Steen wrote:
> When I run lintian on my package i get the following output:
> E: sntop: copyright-file-is-gpl
>
> I read the manpage for lintian but didn't understand what it meant...
>
What would you like this message to say instead?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 02:10:45PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
| On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 02:52:11PM +0100, Fredrik Steen wrote:
|
| > When I run lintian on my package i get the following output:
| > E: sntop: copyright-file-is-gpl
|
| > I read the manpage for lintian but didn't understand what it me
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 02:52:11PM +0100, Fredrik Steen wrote:
> When I run lintian on my package i get the following output:
> E: sntop: copyright-file-is-gpl
> I read the manpage for lintian but didn't understand what it meant...
Instead of including the GPL verbatim in the copyright file you
On Thu, Nov 09 2000, at 14:52:11 +0100, Fredrik Steen wrote:
> When I run lintian on my package i get the following output:
> E: sntop: copyright-file-is-gpl
>
> I read the manpage for lintian but didn't understand what it meant...
You can run lintian with the '-i' switch to display a short expla
When I run lintian on my package i get the following output:
E: sntop: copyright-file-is-gpl
I read the manpage for lintian but didn't understand what it meant...
--
Fredrik Steen
%{---+
| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
| +46 (0)54 7756212 |
+---%}
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 02:10:45PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
| On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 02:52:11PM +0100, Fredrik Steen wrote:
|
| > When I run lintian on my package i get the following output:
| > E: sntop: copyright-file-is-gpl
|
| > I read the manpage for lintian but didn't understand what it m
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 02:52:11PM +0100, Fredrik Steen wrote:
> When I run lintian on my package i get the following output:
> E: sntop: copyright-file-is-gpl
> I read the manpage for lintian but didn't understand what it meant...
Instead of including the GPL verbatim in the copyright file you
On Thu, Nov 09 2000, at 14:52:11 +0100, Fredrik Steen wrote:
> When I run lintian on my package i get the following output:
> E: sntop: copyright-file-is-gpl
>
> I read the manpage for lintian but didn't understand what it meant...
You can run lintian with the '-i' switch to display a short expl
When I run lintian on my package i get the following output:
E: sntop: copyright-file-is-gpl
I read the manpage for lintian but didn't understand what it meant...
--
Fredrik Steen
%{---+
| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
| +46 (0)54 7756212 |
+---%}
--
To UNSUBSCRI
26 matches
Mail list logo
