Steve Robbins wrote: > > On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > > * Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20001109 11:51]: > > > > E: sntop: copyright-file-is-gpl > > > > > > What would you like this message to say instead? > > > > copyright-file-contains-full-license might be better. > > I don't think that is better: sometimes the copyright file *should* be the > full license. > > The only time it should NOT be, is if the copyright is one of those stored > in /usr/share/common-licenses. How about copyright-file-duplicates-common-license then? -Ben [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- lintian message: E: sntop: copyright-file-is-gpl Fredrik Steen
- Re: lintian message: E: sntop: copyright-file-is-... Anton Gyllenberg
- Re: lintian message: E: sntop: copyright-file-is-... Mark Brown
- Re: lintian message: E: sntop: copyright-file... Fredrik Steen
- RE: lintian message: E: sntop: copyright-file-is-... Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
- Re: lintian message: E: sntop: copyright-file... Martin Michlmayr
- Re: lintian message: E: sntop: copyright-... Steve Robbins
- Re: lintian message: E: sntop: copyri... Martin Michlmayr
- Re: lintian message: E: sntop: copyri... Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
- Re: lintian message: E: sntop: c... Fredrik Steen
- Re: lintian message: E: sntop: copyri... Ben Darnell
- Re: lintian message: E: sntop: copyri... André Dahlqvist
- Re: lintian message: E: sntop: copyri... peter karlsson