Re: debstd trouble with multi-binary package

1998-07-08 Thread Will Lowe
> As the author of one of those documents, (Will Lowe is the other but I > don't know if he is still working on it.) I agree completely. I no longer > use debstd in my own packages and don't recommend it to others. I haven't had a need to upload any packages since the hamm freeze, so I've not wo

Re: debstd trouble with multi-binary package

1998-07-08 Thread Joey Hess
Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: > As the author of one of those documents, (Will Lowe is the other but I > don't know if he is still working on it.) I agree completely. I no longer > use debstd in my own packages and don't recommend it to others. > > Since around February off and on, I've been working on

Re: debstd trouble with multi-binary package

1998-07-07 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
As the author of one of those documents, (Will Lowe is the other but I don't know if he is still working on it.) I agree completely. I no longer use debstd in my own packages and don't recommend it to others. Since around February off and on, I've been working on a revised edition which would be

Re: debstd trouble with multi-binary package

1998-07-07 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Mon, Jul 06, 1998 at 03:51:47PM -0400, Shaleh wrote: > depricated means that the item is accepted for now(mostly for > compatibility), but is expected to eventually disappear. The use of > libc5 is deprecated, everything is moving onto libc6. We no longer ship > a version of libc4. Hope that

Re: debstd trouble with multi-binary package

1998-07-07 Thread Adam P. Harris
Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What does "supported" exactly mean? You can still submit bugs against > debmake, and if the fix is obvious, they will be fixed. Well the package is maintained, so it's still supported in that sense. You might have a hard time getting "support" for the de

Re: debstd trouble with multi-binary package

1998-07-06 Thread Shaleh
depricated means that the item is accepted for now(mostly for compatibility), but is expected to eventually disappear. The use of libc5 is deprecated, everything is moving onto libc6. We no longer ship a version of libc4. Hope that helps. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Re: debstd trouble with multi-binary package

1998-07-06 Thread Santiago Vila
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On 6 Jul 1998, Adam P. Harris wrote: > Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > debstd is depricated, use the debhelper instead. > > [...] which ones are deprecated and which are supported, [...] Interesting. Is deprecated the opposite of supported? Wha

Re: debstd trouble with multi-binary package

1998-07-06 Thread treacy
> Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > debstd is depricated, use the debhelper instead. > > Incidentally, if you look at the Debian Developer's corner > (http://www.debian.org/developers_corner), you can see why a lot of > new maintainers start using debstd instead of debhelper. We have

Re: debstd trouble with multi-binary package

1998-07-06 Thread Joey Hess
Adam P. Harris wrote: > Joey Hess, as the maintainer of debhelper, do you see this as a > situation that should change? I think we should eliminate any manuals > suggesting debstd (or put it under a "historic" section), and try to > get someone working on a debhelper equivalent. Perhaps a discuss

Re: debstd trouble with multi-binary package

1998-07-06 Thread Adam P. Harris
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > debstd is depricated, use the debhelper instead. Incidentally, if you look at the Debian Developer's corner (http://www.debian.org/developers_corner), you can see why a lot of new maintainers start using debstd instead of debhelper. We have two differe

Re: debstd trouble with multi-binary package

1998-07-05 Thread Joseph Carter
On Sun, Jul 05, 1998 at 03:25:40PM +0200, Martin Bialasinski wrote: > JC> /usr/doc/debhelper/from-debstd > > JC> It raised another though: The result of following these instructions > showed > JC> me a LOT of things to add to debian/rules. Most of them aren't used > in this > JC> package. How

Re: debstd trouble with multi-binary package

1998-07-05 Thread Martin Bialasinski
>> "JC" == Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JC> /usr/doc/debhelper/from-debstd JC> It raised another though: The result of following these instructions showed JC> me a LOT of things to add to debian/rules. Most of them aren't used in this JC> package. How do I know which are and whi

Re: debstd trouble with multi-binary package

1998-07-05 Thread Joseph Carter
On Sun, Jul 05, 1998 at 07:21:43AM +, Joseph Carter wrote: > On Sat, Jul 04, 1998 at 11:40:11PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > > debstd is depricated, use the debhelper instead. > > I've seen several messages on this line, but I have to say it's not entirely > helpful. I've discovered debstd

Re: debstd trouble with multi-binary package

1998-07-05 Thread Joseph Carter
On Sat, Jul 04, 1998 at 11:40:11PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > debstd is depricated, use the debhelper instead. I've seen several messages on this line, but I have to say it's not entirely helpful. I've discovered debstd does a LOT today. The package I'm looking at which uses it I'd like to c

Re: debstd trouble with multi-binary package

1998-07-04 Thread Martin Schulze
debstd is depricated, use the debhelper instead. Regards, Joey PS: I'd still do everything by hand though. -- Unable to locate coffee, operator halted. -- Stefan Farsch -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED

debstd trouble with multi-binary package

1998-07-04 Thread Martin Bialasinski
Hi, I am working on packaging wxftp. From the source, I want to create wxftp-gtk, wxftp-doc (and later wxftp-dmotif and wxftp-smotif). I started with gtk and doc to check out how to do this. The controlfile looks like this: Source: wxftp Section: non-free/net Priority: optional Maintainer: Mar