On Saturday 26 May 2012 22:44:56 gregor herrmann wrote:
> My shell history finds
> licensecheck -c . -r . | /usr/lib/cdbs/licensecheck2dep5
> but I don't remember if I was impressed by the result or not :)
I've used a similar command to update padre package (or was it pan?).
Since this comm
On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 20:25 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 16:47 -0400, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 14:18:52 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote:
> > > Note also that Lintian now complains about the FSF address in the
> > > first license entry, presumably becau
On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 09:14 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 16:47 -0400, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > Please inspect the source files of the program to see what they state
> > themselfs.
>
>The mrtg-ping-probe perl script itself explicitly references the
> COPYRIGHT file as f
On Sat, 26 May 2012 13:48:21 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote:
> > Then you can do also (from cdbs package):
> > /usr/lib/cdbs/licensecheck2dep5
> I don't use cdbs myself, so that's something I'm not familiar with.
> (Nor can I find how it's actually used, as there is no man page that I
> can f
On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 09:53 -0400, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 May 2012 02:25:11 Robert James Clay wrote:
> > Ah; good point. I'll take a closer look at all of the files again.
>
> You can also use (from devscripts package):
>
> licensecheck --copyright -r .
>
> This will (t
On Wednesday 23 May 2012 02:25:11 Robert James Clay wrote:
> > Please inspect the source files of the program to see what they state
> > themselfs. It is not uncommon to see a statement in the source that it
> > is licensed as GPL version 2 or any later value, while the COPYRIGHT
> > file is just t
Paul,
On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 16:47 -0400, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > The first thing I noticed when I was doing that is that while the
> > original debian/copyright was for GPL-2+ for all files, the actual
> > source COPYRIGHT file looks to be GPL-2 not GPL-2+.
>
> Please inspect the source files of t
On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 16:47 -0400, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 14:18:52 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote:
> > The first thing I noticed when I was doing that is that while the
> > original debian/copyright was for GPL-2+ for all files, the actual
> > source COPYRIGHT file looks to be G
> One of things I decided to do as part of adopting the
> mrtg-ping-probe package was to rewrite debian/copyright for DEP-5.
Thanks for taking care.
> The first thing I noticed when I was doing that is that while the
> original debian/copyright was for GPL-2+ for all files, the actual
> source CO
All,
One of things I decided to do as part of adopting the mrtg-ping-probe
package was to rewrite debian/copyright for DEP-5. The first thing I
noticed when I was doing that is that while the original
debian/copyright was for GPL-2+ for all files, the actual source
COPYRIGHT file looks to be GP
10 matches
Mail list logo
