On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 16:47 -0400, Paul Gevers wrote: > On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 14:18:52 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote: > > The first thing I noticed when I was doing that is that while the > > original debian/copyright was for GPL-2+ for all files, the actual > > source COPYRIGHT file looks to be GPL-2 not GPL-2+. > > Please inspect the source files of the program to see what they state > themselfs. It is not uncommon to see a statement in the source that it > is licensed as GPL version 2 or any later value, while the COPYRIGHT > file is just the GPL v2 license. ....
Ah; good point. I'll take a closer look at all of the files again. > > Note also that Lintian now complains about the FSF address in the > > first license entry, presumably because I copied it from the > > original source COPYRIGHT file. > > Please let upstream know. Upstream is, so far, out of contact... Jame -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1337732711.25485.27.camel@svrpc
