Re: To adopt or not to adopt: smstools

2006-11-22 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello Patrick and *, Am 2006-11-19 20:23:51, schrieb Patrick Schönfeld: > If smsd doesn't do what you want you may try if the new version does fix > your problems. But you would need to get away from the "use > getsms/putsms direct"-approach as newer version incororporate > getsms/putsms into _one

Re: To adopt or not to adopt: smstools

2006-11-19 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello Patrick and *, Am 2006-11-17 17:02:28, schrieb Patrick Schönfeld: > Hi there, > > i am a so-far happy long-time-user of debian and now would like to give > something back to the debian project. Now i've seen a while ago that the > package smstools is far from the upstream smstools (and has

Re: To adopt or not to adopt: smstools

2006-11-17 Thread James Westby
On (18/11/06 01:05), Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: > Hello, > > On Fri, 17 Nov 2006, Patrick Schönfeld wrote: > > Now i asked the maintainer of this package, if he lost time on this > > project or something like that. He did not respond. But he seems to be > > active otherwise and i know he might be

Re: To adopt or not to adopt: smstools

2006-11-17 Thread Kapil Hari Paranjape
Hello, On Fri, 17 Nov 2006, Patrick Schönfeld wrote: > Now i asked the maintainer of this package, if he lost time on this > project or something like that. He did not respond. But he seems to be > active otherwise and i know he might be busy because of the upcoming > release. But how to go on wit

To adopt or not to adopt: smstools

2006-11-17 Thread Patrick Schönfeld
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi there, i am a so-far happy long-time-user of debian and now would like to give something back to the debian project. Now i've seen a while ago that the package smstools is far from the upstream smstools (and has not been changed since a year, excep