On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 6:46 AM, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 11:19:53PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
>> I didn't know about them / their plan of packaging libchamplain so
>> far. There was no ITP, but just an RFP. But perhaps you guys want
>> to sponsor my package? :)
>
> Heh,
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 11:19:53PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 09:15:32PM +0100, Jonny Lamb wrote:
> > I seem to remember Laurent Bigonville and Sjoerd Simons were planning on
> > packaging libchamplain as part of the GNOME packaging group (pkg-gnome).
> > Hav
On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 23:19 +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> I think this also depends on when 0.3 will be
> released (so I just CC'd the software author).
The plan is to have a 0.3 development release around the end of April.
And a 0.4 stable release before Gnome 2.28, or before if fixes go well
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 09:15:32PM +0100, Jonny Lamb wrote:
> I seem to remember Laurent Bigonville and Sjoerd Simons were planning on
> packaging libchamplain as part of the GNOME packaging group (pkg-gnome).
> Have you contacted them about doing the work together with them? (I've
> Cc'd them
On Tue, Mar 31, 16:48:46 +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Ok I WNPP stuff should be ok now. libchamplain closes #498369 "ITP:
> libchamplain" and libchamplain-gtk closes #521626 "ITP:
> libchamplain-gtk".
I seem to remember Laurent Bigonville and Sjoerd Simons were planning on
packaging libchampl
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Please have a look again.
I'm not sponsoring new packages at the moment, but here is a review:
If you haven't read libpkg-guide (and its two bugs), please do so.
Please add symbols files.
sed -i -e 's/documentary of/documentation for
Hi,
Ok I WNPP stuff should be ok now. libchamplain closes #498369 "ITP:
libchamplain" and libchamplain-gtk closes #521626 "ITP:
libchamplain-gtk".
Please have a look again.
-- Sebastian
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Paul,
Thanks for having a look at the packages :)
> > Why are you hijacking this ITP without notifying the bug?
> Sorry, I missed that #498369 is an RFP.
It was an RFP, so I created a new ITP and then the RFP has been
changed to ITP + owner me by somebody else.
> Why does your changelog clos
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> Why are you hijacking this ITP without notifying the bug?
Sorry, I missed that #498369 is an RFP.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscr
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> I would be glad if someone uploaded these packages for me. This
> fixes #498369 and will allow eog-plugins to be packaged.
You seem to have done the WNPP stuff wrong:
Why are you hijacking this ITP without notifying the bug?
Why does y
10 matches
Mail list logo
