> >> Have the patent issues been resolved? IIRC, the SHIFT-AND algorithm has
> >> been patented, and no royalty-free license is available.
> >
> > Where can I find more information on that?
>
> Sorry, I can't find the relevant patent. Probably I was mistaken
> (agrep is in non-free for other reas
> >> Have the patent issues been resolved? IIRC, the SHIFT-AND algorithm has
> >> been patented, and no royalty-free license is available.
> >
> > Where can I find more information on that?
>
> Sorry, I can't find the relevant patent. Probably I was mistaken
> (agrep is in non-free for other reas
Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Have the patent issues been resolved? IIRC, the SHIFT-AND algorithm has
>> been patented, and no royalty-free license is available.
>
> Where can I find more information on that?
Sorry, I can't find the relevant patent. Probably I was mistaken
(agrep is
Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Have the patent issues been resolved? IIRC, the SHIFT-AND algorithm has
>> been patented, and no royalty-free license is available.
>
> Where can I find more information on that?
Sorry, I can't find the relevant patent. Probably I was mistaken
(agrep is
"Thomas Viehmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>>So you think it doesn't matter wether there's two packages named agrep
>>in non-free?
> What do you mean, two packages named agrep?
> Clearly, Luk is seeking a sponsor for his ITA (cf. #201367).
Oh, excuse
Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>So you think it doesn't matter wether there's two packages named agrep
>in non-free?
What do you mean, two packages named agrep?
Clearly, Luk is seeking a sponsor for his ITA (cf. #201367).
Cheers
T.
"Thomas Viehmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>>So you think it doesn't matter wether there's two packages named agrep
>>in non-free?
> What do you mean, two packages named agrep?
> Clearly, Luk is seeking a sponsor for his ITA (cf. #201367).
Oh, excuse
Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>So you think it doesn't matter wether there's two packages named agrep
>in non-free?
What do you mean, two packages named agrep?
Clearly, Luk is seeking a sponsor for his ITA (cf. #201367).
Cheers
T.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 04:04:46PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>
>> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>> > mizar:[~] apt-cache show agrep G Section
>> > Section: non-free/text
>> >
>> > http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-resourc
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 04:04:46PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>
>> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>> > mizar:[~] apt-cache show agrep G Section
>> > Section: non-free/text
>> >
>> > http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-resourc
Luk Claes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>Well I know all this. But I ment I want to have more information how it
>will practically go. Does the patent problems have any implication on the
>upload (to non-free)?
Yes.
>What am I supposed to do with the package or the patent issues?
See if the package w
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 03:54:32PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > > > Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
> > >
> > > A little bit more information would be appreciated.
> >
> > Well, you just failed Debian Philosophy 101.
> >
> >
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 04:04:46PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> > mizar:[~] apt-cache show agrep G Section
> > Section: non-free/text
> >
> > http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-resources.en.html#s4.6.1
>
> So what? In the first sentence
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > > Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
> >
> > A little bit more information would be appreciated.
>
> Well, you just failed Debian Philosophy 101.
>
> Hint: non-free is not part of Debian, it merely uses Debian's
> infrastruct
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>
>> > > There is an agrep package already in Debian:
>> > >
>> > > http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=agrep&searchon=names&subword=1&version=all&release=all
>
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
>
> A little bit more information would be appreciated.
Well, you just failed Debian Philosophy 101.
Hint: non-free is not part of Debian, it merely uses Debian's
infrastructure.
- Matt
>> Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
>A little bit more information would be appreciated.
Please make yourself familiar with some of the ideas behind Debian. (Read the
Social
Contract, DFSG, ...)
agrep is in non-free, non-free is not part of Debian as is explained in the
social
contract
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > > There is an agrep package already in Debian:
> > >
> > > http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=agrep&searchon=names&subword=1&version=all&release=all
>
> Of course it is this package.
>
> > Huh? This
> > There is an agrep package already in Debian:
> >
> > http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=agrep&searchon=names&subword=1&version=all&release=all
Of course it is this package.
> Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
A little bit more information would be
Luk Claes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>Well I know all this. But I ment I want to have more information how it
>will practically go. Does the patent problems have any implication on the
>upload (to non-free)?
Yes.
>What am I supposed to do with the package or the patent issues?
See if the package w
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 03:54:32PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > > > Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
> > >
> > > A little bit more information would be appreciated.
> >
> > Well, you just failed Debian Philosophy 101.
> >
> >
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 04:04:46PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> > mizar:[~] apt-cache show agrep G Section
> > Section: non-free/text
> >
> > http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-resources.en.html#s4.6.1
>
> So what? In the first sentence
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > > Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
> >
> > A little bit more information would be appreciated.
>
> Well, you just failed Debian Philosophy 101.
>
> Hint: non-free is not part of Debian, it merely uses Debian's
> infrastruct
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 08:04:12PM +0800, Wang WenRui wrote:
> There is an agrep package already in Debian:
>
> http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=agrep&searchon=names&subword=1&version=all&release=all
Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
Hi,
There is an agrep package already in Debian:
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=agrep&searchon=names&subword=1&version=all&release=all
Is this the same as yours?
Best regards
Wang WenRui
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 06:21:58PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Hi
>
>
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>
>> > > There is an agrep package already in Debian:
>> > >
>> > > http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=agrep&searchon=names&subword=1&version=all&release=all
>
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
>
> A little bit more information would be appreciated.
Well, you just failed Debian Philosophy 101.
Hint: non-free is not part of Debian, it merely uses Debian's
infrastructure.
- Matt
>> Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
>A little bit more information would be appreciated.
Please make yourself familiar with some of the ideas behind Debian. (Read the Social
Contract, DFSG, ...)
agrep is in non-free, non-free is not part of Debian as is explained in the social
contract (
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > > There is an agrep package already in Debian:
> > >
> > > http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=agrep&searchon=names&subword=1&version=all&release=all
>
> Of course it is this package.
>
> > Huh? This
> > There is an agrep package already in Debian:
> >
> > http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=agrep&searchon=names&subword=1&version=all&release=all
Of course it is this package.
> Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
A little bit more information would be
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 08:04:12PM +0800, Wang WenRui wrote:
> There is an agrep package already in Debian:
>
> http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=agrep&searchon=names&subword=1&version=all&release=all
Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
--
To UNSUBSCR
Hi,
There is an agrep package already in Debian:
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=agrep&searchon=names&subword=1&version=all&release=all
Is this the same as yours?
Best regards
Wang WenRui
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 06:21:58PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Hi
>
>
On Wednesday of July 16 2003 19:28, Luk Claes wrote:
> I am glad there are no software patents in Europe (yet). Does a patent in
> the US have any consequences in Europe??
No, US law got nothing to do in any supreme country except US (and thanks
God). Stuff need to be patented on per country basi
> > I am looking for a sponser for agrep
> > (http://studwww.ugent.be/~lukclaes/debian)
>
> Have the patent issues been resolved? IIRC, the SHIFT-AND algorithm has
> been patented, and no royalty-free license is available.
Where can I find more information on that? (So I do not know if the paten
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 06:21:58PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> I am looking for a sponser for agrep
> (http://studwww.ugent.be/~lukclaes/debian)
Have the patent issues been resolved? IIRC, the SHIFT-AND algorithm has
been patented, and no royalty-free license is available.
Hi
I am looking for a sponser for agrep (http://studwww.ugent.be/~lukclaes/debian)
Description: Text search tool with support for approximate patterns
agrep is a version of standard UNIX grep with the following
enhancements:
o the ability to search for approximate patterns
o it is
On Wednesday of July 16 2003 19:28, Luk Claes wrote:
> I am glad there are no software patents in Europe (yet). Does a patent in
> the US have any consequences in Europe??
No, US law got nothing to do in any supreme country except US (and thanks
God). Stuff need to be patented on per country basi
> > I am looking for a sponser for agrep (http://studwww.ugent.be/~lukclaes/debian)
>
> Have the patent issues been resolved? IIRC, the SHIFT-AND algorithm has
> been patented, and no royalty-free license is available.
Where can I find more information on that? (So I do not know if the patent
iss
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 06:21:58PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> I am looking for a sponser for agrep (http://studwww.ugent.be/~lukclaes/debian)
Have the patent issues been resolved? IIRC, the SHIFT-AND algorithm has
been patented, and no royalty-free license is available.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
Hi
I am looking for a sponser for agrep (http://studwww.ugent.be/~lukclaes/debian)
Description: Text search tool with support for approximate patterns
agrep is a version of standard UNIX grep with the following
enhancements:
o the ability to search for approximate patterns
o it is
40 matches
Mail list logo
