"Thomas Viehmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>>So you think it doesn't matter wether there's two packages named agrep
>>in non-free?
> What do you mean, two packages named agrep?
> Clearly, Luk is seeking a sponsor for his ITA (cf. #201367).
Oh, excuse me. I overlooked the statement
> Of course it is this package.
in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>), and I also
missed that the following question that arouse the subthread ("A little
bit more information would be appreciated." in the same mail) came from
the to-be maintainer.
Therefore I had thought some folks were discussing policy-conformant
wording while the main question ("Is the program you want a sponsor for
the same as the one in the non-free archive"?) had not been resolved.
Of course I see this different now that I noticed who wrote
what. Someone wishing to maintain a program in non-free (as me,
e.g. :-)) should be well aware of the problems associated with that.
Bye, Frank
--
Frank Küster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel
Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie
