On 11/01/2008, Robin Cornelius wrote:
> I'm quite happy for the package to enter the pkg-phototools version
> control system if that is what the group would like and finalise any
> changes there.
I should have made it clear: that was a proposition. :)
> Currently I am hosting the package on my ow
On Jan 11, 2008 1:02 PM, Cyril Brulebois
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/01/2008, Robin Cornelius wrote:
> > Openjpeg is a JPEG2000 library and associated tools for the
> > encoding/decoding of jpegs that use the JPEG2000 format. It is a
> > required component of the secondlife viewer (#406335)
On 11/01/2008, Robin Cornelius wrote:
> Openjpeg is a JPEG2000 library and associated tools for the
> encoding/decoding of jpegs that use the JPEG2000 format. It is a
> required component of the secondlife viewer (#406335) but also has a
> wider general use for image processing.
Hi.
Do you know
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "openjpeg".
* Package name: openjpeg
Version : 1.3-1
Upstream Author : OpenJPEG Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.openjpeg.org/
* License : BSD
Section : libs
It
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 09:22:16PM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 07:54:40PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
>>> Package still at the above URL, version is now 1.1.1-4, and I am
>>> satisfied (to the best of my knowledge) that the packaging is in a fit
>>> state for upload,
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 07:54:40PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
>> Package still at the above URL, version is now 1.1.1-4, and I am
>> satisfied (to the best of my knowledge) that the packaging is in a fit
>> state for upload, barring a dpkg-buildpackage -v 0 -sa to ensure the ITP
>> bug is closed b
Heya,
> Package still at the above URL, version is now 1.1.1-4, and I am
> satisfied (to the best of my knowledge) that the packaging is in a fit
> state for upload, barring a dpkg-buildpackage -v 0 -sa to ensure the ITP
> bug is closed by the full-source upload.
are there any news on this? Havin
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 08:01:19PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Hello Romain,
> Am 2007-03-21 14:25:24, schrieb Romain Beauxis:
>> More comments:
>> * You have lintian warnings about missing manpages. They are required so you
>> may fix this.
> Ehm, a manpage for a executable is clear, but f
Hello Romain,
Am 2007-03-21 14:25:24, schrieb Romain Beauxis:
> More comments:
> * You have lintian warnings about missing manpages. They are required so you
> may fix this.
Ehm, a manpage for a executable is clear, but for a LIB?
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
Michelle Konzack
Systemad
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 02:17:06PM +1100, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> Dear mentors,
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "openjpeg".
> * Package name: openjpeg
Version : 1.1.1-4
> Upstream Author : OpenJPEG Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.openjpeg
Scribit Paul TBBle Hampson dies 31/03/2007 hora 00:58:
> I'm going to have to have a look at quilt. I was under the impression
> that it was a rather complicated patch-management system, used for
> example by Andrew Morton for managing the -mm tree pre git.
quilt is just a must-know IMHO when you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -=| Paul TBBle Hampson, 30.03.2007 17:58 |=-
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 12:06:26AM +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>
>> - -=| Paul TBBle Hampson, 29.03.2007 19:37 |=-
>>> And
>>> although I haven't done
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 12:06:26AM +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> - -=| Paul TBBle Hampson, 29.03.2007 19:37 |=-
>> And
>> although I haven't done it in a while, I don't recall dpatch-edit-patch
>> being particularly fun to use on a non-applying pat
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 12:32:41AM +0200, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> Le jeudi 29 mars 2007 18:37, Paul TBBle Hampson a écrit :
>> Hmm. I don't actually blindly apply .diff.gz to new upstream versions. I
>> usually just copy the debian/ directory across from my old one, inspect
>> the .diff.gz for any
Le jeudi 29 mars 2007 18:37, Paul TBBle Hampson a écrit :
> Hmm. I don't actually blindly apply .diff.gz to new upstream versions. I
> usually just copy the debian/ directory across from my old one, inspect
> the .diff.gz for any changes outside the debian/ directory, and consider
> whether they ar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -=| Paul TBBle Hampson, 29.03.2007 19:37 |=-
> And
> although I haven't done it in a while, I don't recall dpatch-edit-patch
> being particularly fun to use on a non-applying patch...
My experience exactly. This is why I use quilt instead :)
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 04:27:41PM +0200, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> Le jeudi 29 mars 2007 16:18, Paul TBBle Hampson a écrit :
>> And again, if I was going to keep the debian/ directory in an external
>> version-control system, dpatch would be the way to go.
>> Since I'm not going to, the Debian arch
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 12:09:12AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 12:18:23AM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson a écrit :
>> Again, I question the idea that a dpatch is _easier_ to parse than the
>> .diff.gz.
> Actually, I am sorry to critisize general problems of diff.gz in a
> di
Le Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 12:18:23AM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson a écrit :
> Again, I question the idea that a dpatch is _easier_ to parse than the
> .diff.gz.
Hi,
Actually, I am sorry to critisize general problems of diff.gz in a
discussion about the particular one of your package, without having
l
Le jeudi 29 mars 2007 16:18, Paul TBBle Hampson a écrit :
> And again, if I was going to keep the debian/ directory in an external
> version-control system, dpatch would be the way to go.
>
> Since I'm not going to, the Debian archive already has a system for
> storing such trivial patches, in the
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 07:13:27PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 07:41:40PM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson a écrit :
>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 04:54:52PM +0200, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> >> * Any other user/DD may then see precisly what changes you are doing to
> >> upstream so
Le Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 07:41:40PM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson a écrit :
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 04:54:52PM +0200, Romain Beauxis wrote:
>
> > * Any other user/DD may then see precisly what changes you are doing to
> > upstream sources. You will also be able to seperate the changes that
> > perf
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 04:54:52PM +0200, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> However, I see you have made significant changes to the makefile system, in
> order to create a shared object with the correct name and to link dynamically
> the utilities to the shared library, great !
These are not significant
Le mercredi 28 mars 2007 14:44, Paul TBBle Hampson a écrit :
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:31:42PM +0200, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> > Le mercredi 28 mars 2007 12:46, Paul TBBle Hampson a écrit :
> >> OK, I've uploaded a new version, with changelog as follows:
> >
> > Hi Paul !
> > Would you plea
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:31:42PM +0200, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> Le mercredi 28 mars 2007 12:46, Paul TBBle Hampson a écrit :
>> OK, I've uploaded a new version, with changelog as follows:
> Hi Paul !
> Would you please post a link to it for such a lazy guy as me :)
Ooops.
http://mentors.
Le mercredi 28 mars 2007 12:46, Paul TBBle Hampson a écrit :
> OK, I've uploaded a new version, with changelog as follows:
Hi Paul !
Would you please post a link to it for such a lazy guy as me :)
Romain
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 12:33:41AM +1100, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 04:49:42PM +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote:
>> Le mercredi 21 mars 2007 16:32, Paul TBBle Hampson a écrit :
> >>> * debian/copyright: add licence section header between copyright part and
> >>> licence part..
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 04:49:42PM +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> Le mercredi 21 mars 2007 16:32, Paul TBBle Hampson a écrit :
> >> * debian/copyright: add licence section header between copyright part and
> >> licence part.. Policy required it to be verbatim but you may still
> >> seperate what is
Le mercredi 21 mars 2007 16:32, Paul TBBle Hampson a écrit :
> > * debian/copyright: add licence section header between copyright part and
> > licence part.. Policy required it to be verbatim but you may still
> > seperate what is licence and what is copyright..
>
> OK. How do I describe the statem
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 02:25:24PM +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> Le mercredi 21 mars 2007 13:46, Paul TBBle Hampson a écrit :
> >> Anyway, do you have a link to the new package, I'll try to have a deeper
> >> review on this..
>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/openjpeg/
> More comme
Hi,
> build them at all. (And it prolly shouldn't. I need an AMD64 machine to
> pbuilder on...)
>
builds well with pbuilder on amd64. Didn't have the time to test the
packages, though.
Cheers,
Bernd
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
Le mercredi 21 mars 2007 13:46, Paul TBBle Hampson a écrit :
> > Anyway, do you have a link to the new package, I'll try to have a deeper
> > review on this..
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/openjpeg/
More comments:
* You have lintian warnings about missing manpages. They are requ
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 01:18:25PM +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> I had forgot how painfull it is to build a library without
> configure/libtool...
> configure/libtool is a pain in the ass for sure, but coming on those subjects
> it simply and magicaly handle all those hard stuff alone..
Yeah. x
Le mercredi 21 mars 2007 13:04, Paul TBBle Hampson a écrit :
> (You can also see here a use of the version variable set at the top
> of the rules too. ^_^)
Yes..
I had forgot how painfull it is to build a library without
configure/libtool...
configure/libtool is a pain in the ass for sure, but co
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 12:01:50PM +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> Le mercredi 21 mars 2007 09:44, Paul TBBle Hampson a écrit :
>> On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 02:38:44AM +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> >> Le mardi 20 mars 2007 04:17, Paul TBBle Hampson a écrit :
> >>> version=1.0.0
> >>> major=1
> >> st
Le mercredi 21 mars 2007 09:44, Paul TBBle Hampson a écrit :
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 02:38:44AM +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> > Le mardi 20 mars 2007 04:17, Paul TBBle Hampson a écrit :
> >> version=1.0.0
> >> major=1
> >
> > stuff does not seem right, and version is not the one provided..
>
> T
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 02:38:44AM +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> Le mardi 20 mars 2007 04:17, Paul TBBle Hampson a écrit :
>> Dear mentors,
> Hi !
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "openjpeg".
> Some basic comments:
> * debian/rules: you should remove uneeded call to dh_ stuf
Le mardi 20 mars 2007 04:17, Paul TBBle Hampson a écrit :
> Dear mentors,
Hi !
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "openjpeg".
Some basic comments:
* debian/rules: you should remove uneeded call to dh_ stuff. Also the
> # shared library versions, option 1
> version=1.0.0
> majo
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "openjpeg".
* Package name: openjpeg
Version : 1.1.1-1
Upstream Author : OpenJPEG Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.openjpeg.org/
* License : BSD (2-clause as per http://www.openjpeg.org/BSDlicen
39 matches
Mail list logo
