On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 18:38 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Zak B. Elep schrieb:
> > On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 20:48 +0800, Zak B. Elep wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 14:22 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> >>> Okay, please report it against CDBS.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zak B. Elep schrieb:
> On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 20:48 +0800, Zak B. Elep wrote:
>> On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 14:22 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
>>> Okay, please report it against CDBS.
>> I have, waiting for the ticket.
>
> Its Debian Bug #543916.
>
> In t
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 20:48 +0800, Zak B. Elep wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 14:22 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> > Okay, please report it against CDBS.
>
> I have, waiting for the ticket.
Its Debian Bug #543916.
In the meantime, I've uploaded 0.8.0-4 building with the workaround
(declaring DE
В Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:52:43 +0300, George Danchev написа:
> But those diffs are applied in a combined fashion to the upstream source
> (not very helpful for people actually interested to understand the
> code), while they might be extremely interested to understand how many
> *logical* changes hav
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 14:22 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> Zak B. Elep schrieb:
> > Hmm, I built that package earlier today and it was fine (both in and out
> > cowbuilder.) I noticed a new CDBS version up just now and upgraded, and
> > now I get the same result as above, confirming the FTBFS. W
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zak B. Elep schrieb:
> On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 13:46 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
>> Your build ftbfs:
>> /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/autotools-files.mk:49: *** insufficient number
>> of arguments (1) to function `if'. Stop.
>> dpkg-buildpackage: error: de
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 13:46 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> Your build ftbfs:
> /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/autotools-files.mk:49: *** insufficient number
> of arguments (1) to function `if'. Stop.
> dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
> E: Failed autobuilding of pack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zak B. Elep schrieb:
> On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 08:36 +0800, Zak B. Elep wrote:
>> Thanks, all in all, that was a better take on why separate patching
>> should be done. I'll take a look at topgit (and quilt, too) and will
>> probably rebuild the package
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 11:52 +0300, George Danchev wrote:
> Quoting "Zak B. Elep" :
> > Wait, a giant budget excluding a non-internetworked environment? Then
> > again, with the government where I come from, its not too far off to
> > imagine that. :P
>
> It simply boils down to the (strange) secu
Quoting "Zak B. Elep" :
Hi,
On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 20:49 +0200, George Danchev wrote:
Nice argumentation, but not bullet proof ;-)
Was never really an argument. Remember that I did use separate patching
in the previous version (if you read my response in the other thread I
made it quite clea
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 08:36 +0800, Zak B. Elep wrote:
> Thanks, all in all, that was a better take on why separate patching
> should be done. I'll take a look at topgit (and quilt, too) and will
> probably rebuild the package.
OK, I've updated my package, here's 0.8.0-3's changelog:
opendchub (0
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 08:36:05AM +0800, Zak B. Elep wrote:
[...]
> What really goes on here is that there's a stronger preference towards
> having patches in debian/patches/ m as it is a particular convenience
> for maintainers, as opposed to navigating the source tree for diffs. I
> don't objec
On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 20:49 +0200, George Danchev wrote:
> Nice argumentation, but not bullet proof ;-)
Was never really an argument. Remember that I did use separate patching
in the previous version (if you read my response in the other thread I
made it quite clear that I'm not closing the door
> On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 18:43 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> > Sorry, you made a step in the wrong way:
> > * Remove debian/patches, now merged in git
> >
> > Makefile | 588
> > ++
> > src/commands.c|2
> > src/perl_utils.
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 19:38 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> src/commands.c|2
> src/perl_utils.c |9 ++-
>
> There are still those files left.
> I will not sponsor packages who have direct changes in sources.
Understood. Thanks anyway.
--
Zak B. Elep -- 1486 7957 454D E529
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zak B. Elep schrieb:
> On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 18:43 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
>> Sorry, you made a step in the wrong way:
>> * Remove debian/patches, now merged in git
>>
>> Makefile | 588
>> ++
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 18:43 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> Sorry, you made a step in the wrong way:
> * Remove debian/patches, now merged in git
>
> Makefile | 588
> ++
> src/commands.c|2
> src/perl_utils.c |9
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zak B. Elep schrieb:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8.0-1
> of my package "opendchub".
>
> It builds these binary packages:
> opendchub - hub clone for DC (Direct Connect P2P network)
>
> The package appears to
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8.0-1
of my package "opendchub".
It builds these binary packages:
opendchub - hub clone for DC (Direct Connect P2P network)
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 354005, 487662, 495063
The packa
19 matches
Mail list logo
