On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 08:36 +0800, Zak B. Elep wrote: > Thanks, all in all, that was a better take on why separate patching > should be done. I'll take a look at topgit (and quilt, too) and will > probably rebuild the package.
OK, I've updated my package, here's 0.8.0-3's changelog: opendchub (0.8.0-3) unstable; urgency=low * Use TopGit and Quilt to manage patches * Re-add debian/patches, with diffs autogenerated from git branches * Add debian/README.source describing the package build And here's the diffstat: NEWS | 20 ++++ README.Debian | 37 +++++++ README.source | 34 ++++++ changelog | 151 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ compat | 1 config.default | 62 ++++++++++++ control | 41 ++++++++ copyright | 33 ++++++ docs | 2 init | 58 +++++++++++ manpages | 1 motd.default | 3 opendchub.1 | 71 ++++++++++++++ patches/bugs/495063.diff | 58 +++++++++++ patches/fixes/avoid-buffer-overflow.diff | 29 +++++ patches/series | 2 postinst | 85 +++++++++++++++++ postrm | 20 ++++ rules | 30 ++++++ watch | 4 20 files changed, 742 insertions(+) dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/opendchub/opendchub_0.8.0-3.dsc -- Zak B. Elep -- 1486 7957 454D E529 E4F1 F75E 5787 B1FD FA53 851D I like the idea of 256 bits, though: 32 for the (Unicode) character leaves room for 224 Bucky bits, which ought to be enough for anyone. -- Roland Hutchinson, in alt.folklore.computers
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
