Re: RFS: nvrec

2002-06-17 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 12:55:25PM +0200, Marc Leeman wrote: > Colin Watson wrote: > > What about autobuilders, or anyone who might have to do a non-maintainer > > upload of the package at some point in the future? > > Autobuilders will have a package that is tailored to their system > (optimised,

Re: RFS: nvrec

2002-06-17 Thread Marc Leeman
> What about autobuilders, or anyone who might have to do a non-maintainer > upload of the package at some point in the future? Autobuilders will have a package that is tailored to their system (optimised, hence running faster). Somebody that does a non-maintainer build (not me), will have to che

Re: RFS: nvrec

2002-06-17 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 10:29:14AM +0200, Marc Leeman wrote: > I have a general question, that I did find a answer for in the debian > policy guide (don't falme me if I missed it :(( ) > > Nicolas gave me the advice to exclude all processor optimisations in the > nvrec package, so I added the conf

Re: RFS: nvrec

2002-06-17 Thread Marc Leeman
Hello again, I have a general question, that I did find a answer for in the debian policy guide (don't falme me if I missed it :(( ) Nicolas gave me the advice to exclude all processor optimisations in the nvrec package, so I added the configure flags --enable-mmxcheck --enable-cpucheck that are

Re: RFS: nvrec

2002-06-12 Thread Marc Leeman
> Why don't you suggest upstream to use libogg instead/too? I do not think that ogg is supported in common video compressed formats. I guess it's just a matter of comply with "standards". I am not aware of video (trans)coders that use ogg for audio compression (yet). -- greetz, marc

Re: RFS: nvrec

2002-06-12 Thread Marc Leeman
> Why don't you suggest upstream to use libogg instead/too? I do not think that ogg is supported in common video compressed formats. I guess it's just a matter of comply with "standards". I am not aware of video (trans)coders that use ogg for audio compression (yet). -- greetz, marc

Re: RFS: nvrec

2002-06-12 Thread Michael Banck
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 10:56:46AM +0200, Marc Leeman wrote: > > > As far as I know, lame is not in Debian, and can't be because of a > > patent... :-( > > So I guess nvrec will at best belong to contrib. Were you aware of this > > issue? > > I know that lame and all related mp3 encoders were not

Re: RFS: nvrec

2002-06-12 Thread Michael Banck
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 10:56:46AM +0200, Marc Leeman wrote: > > > As far as I know, lame is not in Debian, and can't be because of a > > patent... :-( > > So I guess nvrec will at best belong to contrib. Were you aware of this > > issue? > > I know that lame and all related mp3 encoders were no

Re: RFS: nvrec

2002-06-12 Thread Marc Leeman
> As far as I know, lame is not in Debian, and can't be because of a > patent... :-( > So I guess nvrec will at best belong to contrib. Were you aware of this > issue? I know that lame and all related mp3 encoders were not in debian because of this problem, but it completely slipped my mind when

Re: RFS: nvrec

2002-06-12 Thread Marc Leeman
> As far as I know, lame is not in Debian, and can't be because of a > patent... :-( > So I guess nvrec will at best belong to contrib. Were you aware of this > issue? I know that lame and all related mp3 encoders were not in debian because of this problem, but it completely slipped my mind when

Re: RFS: nvrec

2002-06-11 Thread Nicolas Boullis
Hi ! I'd be interrested to sponsor nvrec, but I fear there is a problem: On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 03:23:30PM +0200, Marc Leeman wrote: > Package: nvrec > Version: 20020530-3 > Priority: extra > Section: x11 > Maintainer: Marc Leeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Depends: libc6 (>= 2.2.4-4), liblame0 (>=

Re: RFS: nvrec

2002-06-11 Thread Nicolas Boullis
Hi ! I'd be interrested to sponsor nvrec, but I fear there is a problem: On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 03:23:30PM +0200, Marc Leeman wrote: > Package: nvrec > Version: 20020530-3 > Priority: extra > Section: x11 > Maintainer: Marc Leeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Depends: libc6 (>= 2.2.4-4), liblame0 (>=

RFS: nvrec

2002-06-11 Thread Marc Leeman
I am packaging nvrec and am looking for someone who wants to verify and the package, since I got it through lintian without probs. The URI is: deb http://lesbos.esat.kuleuven.ac.be/~mleeman/debian unstable/ deb-src http://lesbos.esat.kuleuven.ac.be/~mleeman/debian unstable/ Package: nvrec Versio

RFS: nvrec

2002-06-11 Thread Marc Leeman
I am packaging nvrec and am looking for someone who wants to verify and the package, since I got it through lintian without probs. The URI is: deb http://lesbos.esat.kuleuven.ac.be/~mleeman/debian unstable/ deb-src http://lesbos.esat.kuleuven.ac.be/~mleeman/debian unstable/ Package: nvrec Versi