Re: RFS: commons-math

2009-03-20 Thread Matthew Johnson
On Fri Mar 20 13:47, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > > Could you upload my package as is ? Done Matt -- Matthew Johnson signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: commons-math

2009-03-20 Thread Matthew Johnson
On Fri Mar 20 13:47, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > I finally see our misundertanding : I already build all class files with > -source > 1.3 and -target 1.3 (class Format 47) as recommanded by upstream. They will > run fine on any JVM >= 1.3. Aha, excellent. > Could you upload my package as is ?

Re: RFS: commons-math

2009-03-20 Thread Damien Raude-Morvan
Hi Matt, On Friday 20 March 2009 00:57:35 Matthew Johnson wrote: > On Thu Mar 19 21:01, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > > > Ok, can I suggest a compromise. Build-depend on default-jdk and then at > > > build time compile with default-jdk and, if openjdk is installed, use > > > it to run the test sui

Re: RFS: commons-math

2009-03-19 Thread Matthew Johnson
On Thu Mar 19 21:01, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > > Ok, can I suggest a compromise. Build-depend on default-jdk and then at > > build time compile with default-jdk and, if openjdk is installed, use it > > to run the test suite. > > It would make the build nondeterministic between different host w

Re: RFS: commons-math

2009-03-19 Thread Damien Raude-Morvan
Hi Matt, On Thursday 19 March 2009 00:32:55 Matthew Johnson wrote: > On Sun Mar 15 23:58, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > > On Sunday 15 March 2009 21:09:33 Matthew Johnson wrote: > > > Hi Damien, I'm looking at it now, I've got a couple of points, > > Hi, sorry for the delay. > > > Sounds reasonable

Re: RFS: commons-math

2009-03-18 Thread Matthew Johnson
On Sun Mar 15 23:58, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > On Sunday 15 March 2009 21:09:33 Matthew Johnson wrote: > > Hi Damien, I'm looking at it now, I've got a couple of points, Hi, sorry for the delay. > Sounds reasonable: I've downgraded openjdk-6-jre-headless to a Suggests. > But now, Lintian compl

Re: RFS: commons-math

2009-03-15 Thread Damien Raude-Morvan
On Sunday 15 March 2009 21:09:33 Matthew Johnson wrote: > Hi Damien, I'm looking at it now, I've got a couple of points, Hi Matthew and thanks for taking care. > firstly, libraries should not depend on runtimes (you depend on > openjdk-6-jre-headless | java2-runtime-headless), applications using

Re: RFS: commons-math

2009-03-15 Thread Matthew Johnson
On Sun Mar 15 20:30, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > Dear mentors and Java maintainers, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "commons-math". Hi Damien, I'm looking at it now, I've got a couple of points, firstly, libraries should not depend on runtimes (you depend on openjdk-6-jre-headless

RFS: commons-math

2009-03-15 Thread Damien Raude-Morvan
Dear mentors and Java maintainers, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "commons-math". * Package name: commons-math Version : 1.2-1 Upstream Author : Apache Software Foundation * URL : http://commons.apache.org/math/ * License : Apache 2.0 Section