Hi Matt, On Thursday 19 March 2009 00:32:55 Matthew Johnson wrote: > On Sun Mar 15 23:58, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > > On Sunday 15 March 2009 21:09:33 Matthew Johnson wrote: > > > Hi Damien, I'm looking at it now, I've got a couple of points, > > Hi, sorry for the delay. > > > Sounds reasonable: I've downgraded openjdk-6-jre-headless to a Suggests. > > But now, Lintian complains about "virtual-package-depends-without-real- > > package-depends". > > May I ignore that ? > > No, you either have to have <realjvm> | javaX-runtime, or nothing, > policy (real policy) doesn't allow depends on virtual packages. I don't > like depending on JVMs from library packages, so I would go for nothing.
Ok, seems logical to me. Done (deployed on mentors and pkg-java SVN). > > > > This package is build using OpenJDK6 instead of GCJ because OpenJDK6 > > > > is really faster doing test-suite (x10 factor). [...] > Ok, can I suggest a compromise. Build-depend on default-jdk and then at > build time compile with default-jdk and, if openjdk is installed, use it > to run the test suite. It would make the build nondeterministic between different host with different installed packages [1]. I'm reluctant to make this change (aka you have to convice me :P. Cheers, [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/02/msg00171.html -- Damien Raude-Morvan / www.drazzib.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
