Package: developers-reference, www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Please mention devconf-devel(7) in the developers reference and at
debian.org/devel/
I really hope its clear that debconf-devel needs to have something
else pointing to it, since it is the second time in 30 days that
someone has bee
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:41:00 +0100, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>> And I thought I could rely upon dpkg from the next upload to call
>> the configure script with the same arguments as it did before, just
>> as I can rely on the same for p
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:41:00 +0100, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> And I thought I could rely upon dpkg from the next upload to call
> the configure script with the same arguments as it did before, just
> as I can rely on the same for preinst, postinst etc.
Not more than what p
* Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051227 17:40]:
> Do you think it would be an obstacle for development if that were
> documented in the Policy, just as the same is documented for the
> "classical" maintainer scripts? Why isn't it an obstacle for those
> other scripts?
Well, I think any new sc
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:27:04 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
>
>> On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 09:23:23PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>>> On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 19:59:07 -0200, Rogério Brito
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
On Dec
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:27:04 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 09:23:23PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 19:59:07 -0200, Rogério Brito
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>> On Dec 25 2005, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
Ah yeah, this
On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 09:23:23PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 19:59:07 -0200, Rogério Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> On Dec 25 2005, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>>> Ah yeah, this seems to contain the information. Thanks a lot. Is
>>> there a good reason it is not in th
On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 06:41:38PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Rogério Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Dec 26 2005, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> >> (policy also contains a formal definition of the debconf protocol amoung
> >> other bits of debconf documentation)
>
> > This I could not find, as
Rogério Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Dec 26 2005, Joey Hess wrote:
>> (policy also contains a formal definition of the debconf protocol amoung
>> other bits of debconf documentation)
> This I could not find, as I already pointed in the reply to Russ...
This is something different than
On Dec 26 2005, Joey Hess wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > Sure. Should be in the documentation of debconf itself.
Right.
> debconf-devel(7), anyone?
Right and sorry for being obtuse. :-)
> (policy also contains a formal definition of the debconf protocol amoung
> other bits of debc
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > It would be nicer to have it completely described (and in an updated
> > manner) in a definitive reference, of course.
>
> Sure. Should be in the documentation of debconf itself.
debconf-devel(7), anyone?
(policy also contains a formal definition of the debcon
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 19:59:07 -0200, Rogério Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hi, Lionel.
> On Dec 25 2005, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 05:37:11PM -0200, Rogério Brito wrote:
>> > * http://www.kitenet.net/~joey/debconf-debconf/tutorial-doc.html
>> Ah yeah, this seems to
Hi, Lionel.
On Dec 25 2005, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 05:37:11PM -0200, Rogério Brito wrote:
> > But you question below left me with an impression that it could be
> > related to the config script of the package that is made to use
> > debconf stuff in a package. Is this
13 matches
Mail list logo
