On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 19:59:07 -0200, Rogério Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hi, Lionel. > On Dec 25 2005, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: >> On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 05:37:11PM -0200, Rogério Brito wrote: >> > * http://www.kitenet.net/~joey/debconf-debconf/tutorial-doc.html >> Ah yeah, this seems to contain the information. Thanks a lot. Is >> there a good reason it is not in the policy? Policy is not the place to put documentation that belongs to packages? Policy mandates usage of debconf; how debconf works is described in the docs related to debconf. I am not sure that this should be writ in stone in policy. > I was under the same dilemma that you are facing now. That tutorial > makes references to the policy and I went there to see if I could > find anything, but I didn't find. > To integrate debconf on vrms, I used the tutorial, lintian, a bit of > guess-work (e.g., things about the debconf-2.0) and a bit of common > sense (taking into consideration the fact that the document is not > exactly that new). > It would be nicer to have it completely described (and in an updated > manner) in a definitive reference, of course. Sure. Should be in the documentation of debconf itself. >> If not, I'll file a bug to get it there. > I guess that that's the proper thing to do here. I beg to differ -- if you think this belongs in policy itself. manoj -- Old timer, n.: One who remembers when charity was a virtue and not an organization. Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/> 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
