Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > It would be nicer to have it completely described (and in an updated > > manner) in a definitive reference, of course. > > Sure. Should be in the documentation of debconf itself.
debconf-devel(7), anyone? (policy also contains a formal definition of the debconf protocol amoung other bits of debconf documentation) -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
