Re: Multiple upstream changelog files

2007-01-30 Thread Magnus Holmgren
On Tuesday 30 January 2007 01:54, Magnus Holmgren wrote: > I maintain a package where the upstream author has two changelog files: A > brief one called Changes, summarizing the changes, and a detailed one > called ChangeLog, which contains a detailed list of changes made to the > various source fil

Re: Multiple upstream changelog files

2007-01-30 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Dumb question: How this? debian/package.NEWS is (from man-page reading) > just a different form for debian/NEWS and this file is installed > as /usr/share/doc/package/NEWS.Debian.gz, which is not intended to > contain the upstream NEWS file. Am I wrong?

Re: Multiple upstream changelog files

2007-01-30 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Dienstag, den 30.01.2007, 00:35 -0500 schrieb Justin Pryzby: > On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 02:44:00AM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: > > Am Dienstag, den 30.01.2007, 01:54 +0100 schrieb Magnus Holmgren: > > > I better ask this once and for all... > > > > > > I maintain a package where the upstream au

Re: Multiple upstream changelog files

2007-01-30 Thread Marcus Better
Magnus Holmgren wrote: >> This is common with Java packages built with Maven, where a detailed >> commit log is automatically generated and included in the sources. In >> that case I prefer to leave out the commit log altogether > But what if Changes says "see ChangeLog for details"? Mention of t

Re: Multiple upstream changelog files

2007-01-30 Thread Magnus Holmgren
On Tuesday 30 January 2007 08:52, Marcus Better wrote: > Magnus Holmgren wrote: > > I maintain a package where the upstream author has two changelog files: A > > brief one called Changes, summarizing the changes, and a detailed one > > called ChangeLog, which contains a detailed list of changes mad

Re: Multiple upstream changelog files

2007-01-29 Thread Marcus Better
Magnus Holmgren wrote: > I maintain a package where the upstream author has two changelog files: A > brief one called Changes, summarizing the changes, and a detailed one > called ChangeLog, which contains a detailed list of changes made to the > various source files. This is common with Java pack

Re: Multiple upstream changelog files

2007-01-29 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 02:44:00AM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 30.01.2007, 01:54 +0100 schrieb Magnus Holmgren: > > I better ask this once and for all... > > > > I maintain a package where the upstream author has two changelog files: A > > brief one called Changes, summarizing

Re: Multiple upstream changelog files

2007-01-29 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Dienstag, den 30.01.2007, 01:54 +0100 schrieb Magnus Holmgren: > I better ask this once and for all... > > I maintain a package where the upstream author has two changelog files: A > brief one called Changes, summarizing the changes, and a detailed one called > ChangeLog, which contains a det

Re: Multiple upstream changelog files

2007-01-29 Thread Margarita Manterola
On 1/29/07, Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I maintain a package where the upstream author has two changelog files: A brief one called Changes, summarizing the changes, and a detailed one called ChangeLog, which contains a detailed list of changes made to the various source files. Whic

Multiple upstream changelog files

2007-01-29 Thread Magnus Holmgren
I better ask this once and for all... I maintain a package where the upstream author has two changelog files: A brief one called Changes, summarizing the changes, and a detailed one called ChangeLog, which contains a detailed list of changes made to the various source files. Which one should be