Am Dienstag, den 30.01.2007, 00:35 -0500 schrieb Justin Pryzby: > On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 02:44:00AM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: > > Am Dienstag, den 30.01.2007, 01:54 +0100 schrieb Magnus Holmgren: > > > I better ask this once and for all... > > > > > > I maintain a package where the upstream author has two changelog files: A > > > brief one called Changes, summarizing the changes, and a detailed one > > > called > > > ChangeLog, which contains a detailed list of changes made to the various > > > source files. Which one should be installed as "changelog"? > > > > > > I'd guess the brief one, since it's the one users are most likely to want > > > to > > > read first, but on the other hand it looks a bit confusing with both a > > > changelog(.gz) and a ChangeLog. > > > > I agree to this. I normally prefer to install the NEWS file (release > > changelog) instead of the ChangeLog file (file changelog). It's shorter > > and easier to understand. File changelogs are often very detailed and > > important information is hard to find. > I would prefer to have both available to me, with the detailed changelog as > changelog.gz and the summary as NEWS.gz. dh_installchangelogs handles this > with ./debian/package.NEWS.
Dumb question: How this? debian/package.NEWS is (from man-page reading) just a different form for debian/NEWS and this file is installed as /usr/share/doc/package/NEWS.Debian.gz, which is not intended to contain the upstream NEWS file. Am I wrong? Regards, Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
