On Tuesday 30 January 2007 01:54, Magnus Holmgren wrote: > I maintain a package where the upstream author has two changelog files: A > brief one called Changes, summarizing the changes, and a detailed one > called ChangeLog, which contains a detailed list of changes made to the > various source files. Which one should be installed as "changelog"?
OK, so now I have three different bids: 1) Distribute the brief changelog
as "changelog.gz" and the detailed one as is; 2) distribute the detailed
changelog as "changelog.gz" and the brief one as is; 3) only distribute the
brief changelog in the binary package. Any more opinions?
The package in question is libmail-dkim-perl, BTW.
--
Magnus Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgp5Gh5uSyveP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
