On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Godfrey Chung wrote:
> Please follow the steps from http://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers.
In addition, since you are developing the software, please read our
upstream guide:
http://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWi
Dear Kirill
Please follow the steps from http://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers.
Regards
Godfrey
From: Kirill Gavrilov
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 3:51 PM
To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: Adding packages for new project (sView) - first steps
Hi list,
I am author of
Hi list,
I am author of sView project and looking for answers from Debian community.
I have found that there are several ways to add new packages to Debian but
which way should I to use as newbie?
Should I try to register as Debian New Member or search for a "sponsor"?
I have some experience in m
On 27/05/2009 10:13, Federico Gimenez Nieto wrote:
Pretty much anywhere is a good starting point, as long as (a) it's free,
and (b) the source doesn't require a lot patching to work or manipulation
to install. I haven't looked at openx myself, but as long as it doesn't
require you to manually ins
> Pretty much anywhere is a good starting point, as long as (a) it's free,
> and (b) the source doesn't require a lot patching to work or manipulation
> to install. I haven't looked at openx myself, but as long as it doesn't
> require you to manually install random files, etc. it's probably fine.
>
Welcome!
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Federico Gimenez Nieto
wrote:
I would like to begin collaborating in package maintaining. I've
followed the guide at [1] and, after looking at [2] for Os and RFAs
(specially those related with php, ruby or xml in general), i've found
at [3] an RFP for
Dear mentors,
This is my first message to the list so hi to all :)
I would like to begin collaborating in package maintaining. I've
followed the guide at [1] and, after looking at [2] for Os and RFAs
(specially those related with php, ruby or xml in general), i've found
at [3] an RFP for openx, a
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Lastly, Florian Ernst kindly sponsored my sextractor package last
> week; it is now waiting in the new queue. ds9 is already available in
> Debian (though it won't be for much longer if upstream doesn't provide
> unobfuscated source in their v4 relea
Following up on -science.
Justin
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 11:59:16AM +0200, Cedric BRINER wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 11:19:29AM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 09:04:57AM -0400, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
> > > Cedric BRINER wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I'm wo
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 11:19:29AM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 09:04:57AM -0400, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
> > Cedric BRINER wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm working as a sysadmin at the Geneva Observatory and we do need
> > > some softwares which are not provided by the
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 09:48:31AM +0200, Cedric BRINER wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working as a sysadmin at the Geneva Observatory and we do need
> some softwares which are not provided by the debian distribution. So
> I thought that it will be a good idea to do this job well once and
> to give this bac
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 09:04:57AM -0400, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
> Cedric BRINER wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm working as a sysadmin at the Geneva Observatory and we do need
> > some softwares which are not provided by the debian distribution. So
> > I thought that it will be a good idea to do th
Cedric BRINER wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working as a sysadmin at the Geneva Observatory and we do need
> some softwares which are not provided by the debian distribution. So
> I thought that it will be a good idea to do this job well once and to
> give this back to the debian community.
>
> the softw
Cedric BRINER wrote:
> I'm working as a sysadmin at the Geneva Observatory and we do need
> some softwares which are not provided by the debian distribution. So I
> thought that it will be a good idea to do this job well once and to
> give this back to the debian community.
Really, you will need
Hi,
I'm working as a sysadmin at the Geneva Observatory and we do need some
softwares which are not provided by the debian distribution. So I thought that
it will be a good idea to do this job well once and to give this back to the
debian community.
the software that I'm willing to package are
On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 01:04:52PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Apr 2003, Pete Ryland wrote:
> > > Or would you like to accuse me of tampering with the list archives while
> > > you're at it?
> >
> > Oh, ok. If you'd like. ;-)
>
> Consider me offended.
:-)
> > > Out of interest,
On Fri, 18 Apr 2003, Pete Ryland wrote:
> > Or would you like to accuse me of tampering with the list archives while
> > you're at it?
>
> Oh, ok. If you'd like. ;-)
Consider me offended.
> > Out of interest, are there any MUAs which have a separate "reply to list"
> > function?
>
> Most do
On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 01:54:59PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Apr 2003, Pete Ryland wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 11:46:21AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > > On Wed, 16 Apr 2003, David Z Maze wrote:
> > > > Your mailer doesn't have a "reply to all" button? Get a better one,
>
On Fri, 2003-04-18 at 09:56, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > Out of interest, are there any MUAs which have a separate "reply to list"
> > function?
>
> KDE's 'kmail' for those into GUIs to read text. But you have to
> configure the list address on a per folder basis.
Evolution als
Matthew Palmer wrote:
> Out of interest, are there any MUAs which have a separate "reply to list"
> function?
KDE's 'kmail' for those into GUIs to read text. But you have to
configure the list address on a per folder basis.
Bob
pgpKg8pXDLrj4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 01:54:59PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> Out of interest, are there any MUAs which have a separate "reply to list"
> function?
Yes, Mutt. See the 'Mailing Lists' and 'Handling Mailing Lists' sections of
its manual (/usr/share/doc/mutt/manual.txt.gz in its package.)
--
T
On Thu, 17 Apr 2003, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Tony Maro wrote:
> > Why do I feel like I opened a can of worms?
>
> It is that squirmy feeling in the gut. Like just before the alien
> claws its way out.
Tony really should read the labels better.
- Matt
On Thu, 17 Apr 2003, Pete Ryland wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 11:46:21AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Apr 2003, David Z Maze wrote:
> > > Your mailer doesn't have a "reply to all" button? Get a better one,
> > > Debian has lots.
> >
> > The problem we're discussing, though, is
Tony Maro wrote:
> Why do I feel like I opened a can of worms?
It is that squirmy feeling in the gut. Like just before the alien
claws its way out.
Bob
pgpClP4tDDzjT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Don, 2003-04-17 at 03:46, Matthew Palmer wrote:
>
> Of course, depending on your POV, it might be seen as less resource
> intensive just to set up a procmail duplicate-killer instead of trying to
> educate the entire Internet on proper e-mail technique.
Does that even depend on the POV? :) Th
Pete Ryland wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 11:46:21AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Wed, 16 Apr 2003, David Z Maze wrote:
Your mailer doesn't have a "reply to all" button? Get a better one,
Debian has lots.
The problem we're discussing, though, is that "reply to all" means e
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 11:46:21AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Apr 2003, David Z Maze wrote:
> > Your mailer doesn't have a "reply to all" button? Get a better one,
> > Debian has lots.
>
> The problem we're discussing, though, is that "reply to all" means exactly
> that - to *all*.
On Wed, 16 Apr 2003, David Z Maze wrote:
> > Odd considering that so far most every reply that I've received
> > (except yours of course) included two copies. And the fact that you
> > can't just hit "reply" and have it go back to the list - it wants to
> > only reply to the sender.
>
> Your mai
Tony Maro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Odd considering that so far most every reply that I've received
> (except yours of course) included two copies. And the fact that you
> can't just hit "reply" and have it go back to the list - it wants to
> only reply to the sender.
Your mailer doesn't hav
On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 08:12:26AM -0500, Tony Maro wrote:
> Andrew Stribblehill wrote:
> >PPS. Most people who read the Debian mailing lists are subscribed to
> >them. Mailing them as well as the list means they get two copies.
> >Being a cantankerous lot as a rule, we don't like this :)
>
> Odd
Andrew Stribblehill wrote:
However, you're not that far yet, in that you probably don't have an
archive you can upload to. To get a package into Debian, it needs to
be sponsored, often by someone on this list.
Of course. I actually still have a lot to learn of the package format
before I c
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2003-04-15 09:04:55 BST):
> Quoting Andrew Stribblehill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > You're still better off building from source even if your software
> > doesn't use a Makefile. Just think "Do whatever is necessary to
> > compile" where the docs say "mak
32 matches
Mail list logo
