On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 01:24:59AM -0600, David Moreno Garza wrote:
> > What do you people think of modifying the window managers to look for
> > skippy and start it when initing? For example, we could patch metacity
> > to have an option on its capplet that allows you to enable skippy-like
> > fu
On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 09:03 -0600, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> > Perhaps:
> >
> > skippy
> > skippy-gnome
> > skippy-icewm
> > skippy-kde
>
> I don't like this idea. As you said yourself it's completely overkill.
>
> > Do you have some specific suggestion on how it should
Em Seg, 2005-02-28 Ãs 09:25 +, Steve Kemp escreveu:
> It is currently setup such that the user must run it manually, and
> there is no attempt made to install it on a system-wide, or per-user
> basis.
>
> I think this is the correct approach to take for a first stab at
> the package and
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 02:07:45AM -0600, David Moreno Garza wrote:
> Skippy is a nice piece of software.
Agreed.
> Gustavo Noronha and I were talking (in CONSOL[1]) about how would be the
> best way to package skippy. Honestly, I haven't had the chance to check
> any ITP/related-work on this,
On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 02:07 -0600, David Moreno Garza wrote:
> Cheers,
Forgot about my references:
1: http://www.consol.org.mx/2005/
2: http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
--
David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://www.damog.net/
UNIX is an O.S., OS/2 is half an O.S., Windows is a she
On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 00:00 +, Steve Kemp wrote:
> > [1]Skippy is a full-screen task/window switcher a la Apple Expos??, this
> >package closes bug #259096 [2].
> >I didn't fill an ITP on skippy as the upstream author does
> >not respond to my mails, so i do
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 10:14:32AM +0100, Niv Altivanik wrote:
> Hi, I have previously posted on this mailing list to ask for someone
> to get interested in my packages, without any response, hope I'll get
> more chance this time.
I'm surpised, I thought I remembered a response.
> they are all
I haven't contacted the mpd/gmpc official Debian Developer, my idea
was to have my package tested and approved and then ask him if he was
interested in maintaining the package, but you are right, mpd, gmpc
and glurp are different softwares.
I'd be really excited to maintain this package for the De
Niv Altivanik (xaiki) wrote, On 01/26/2005 05:53 PM:
Sorry, i miss-expressed myself, I meant that I don't feel like
maintaining the package under my name but, propose to maintain it for
this maintainer when other debian developers have approved the package
quality.
Sorry, I still don't understand.
>BTW... I'm getting a 404 on the address you provided for download.
Sorry, all the packages paths are wrong,
so you can have them all respectively:
skippy: http://cxhome.ath.cx/debian/skippy/
glurp: http://cxhome.ath.cx/debian/glurp/
gcursor: http://cxhome.ath.cx/debian/gcursor/
Sorry again, s
Niv Altivanik (Debian) wrote, On 01/26/2005 06:14 AM:
[3]Glurp is a gtk2.4+ client for the MPD music player daemon.
I didn't fill an ITP on Glurp because there already is a
maintainer for MPD related and i feel he should just take
my package as a work relief.
Did
Hi, I have previously posted on this mailing list to ask for someone
to get interested in my packages, without any response, hope I'll get
more chance this time.
all packages can be found on http://cxhome.ath.cx/debian
I've made them with debhelper, following the guide provided on the
debian de
12 matches
Mail list logo
