Hi,
On 2025-01-08 10:55, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 4:33 PM Andrius Merkys wrote:
I am building juce 8.0.4+ds-1 without documentation (nodoc build
profile). debian/control lists the following documentation dependencies:
Build-Depends-Indep:
dh-sequence-doxygen
Hello,
I am building juce 8.0.4+ds-1 without documentation (nodoc build
profile). debian/control lists the following documentation dependencies:
Build-Depends-Indep:
dh-sequence-doxygen ,
graphviz ,
Thus I would expect the nodoc build pass without them. However,
dpkg-buildpackage complains
Hi Hilmar,
On 2024-11-24 00:48, Preuße, Hilmar wrote:
Am 21.11.2024 um 08:32 schrieb Andrius Merkys:
I can confirm this from my practical experience. Nevertheless you
should be able to make your build work by symlinking a component to
the needed subdirectory.
That seems to be a good ideas
Hi,
On 2024-11-20 22:16, Soren Stoutner wrote:
On Tuesday, November 19, 2024 3:39:06 PM MST Hilmar Preuße wrote:
I hope this is an easy question: the new version of asymptote downloads
additional tar balls (two) during configure, which are unpackaged and
used during build. Page [1] describes ho
Hi,
On 2024-09-18 00:56, Preuße, Hilmar wrote:
before pushing a broken package to the NEW queue: I started again
working on #698886 and have a here a package, which is quite lintian
clean. What causes headache is the license "Modified MIT license".
The following paragraph has been added by th
Hello,
I care for tree packages which still have open "NMU diff for 64-bit
time_t transition" bugs: libccp4, macromoleculebuilder and rdkit. All of
them have NMU diffs applied in experimental, but not in unstable yet.
What should I do about them - apply NMU diffs to unstable as well, or
wait
Hi Soren,
On 2024-05-03 01:12, Soren Stoutner wrote:
I am very much not a uscan expert, but the attached watch file appears to do
what you want.
Key changes are:
1. Adding a dversionmangle line to each entry that modifies the Debian version
number to extract the information that should be use
age).
I would appreciate any help with this.
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/merkys/vst3sdk/-/raw/master/debian/watch
Best,
Andrius
Hi Shriram,
On 2024-02-09 16:16, Shriram Ravindranathan wrote:
I am packaging a C++ TUI library called FTXUI in which there's an
examples/ folder which I am installing to
/usr/share/doc/ftxui-dev/examples/
One of these examples is for using the library with webassembly is a
HTML file that lo
Hi Shriram,
On 2023-11-18 10:26, Shriram Ravindranathan wrote:
I am packaging magic_enum, a header-only C++ library which uses CMake
with GNUInstallDirs. AFAIK the package should be arch-independent as
there is no architecture dependent code in it.
[...]
W: libmagicenum-dev: pkg-config-unav
Hi,
On 2023-06-20 17:15, Ramūnas Keliuotis wrote:
4. Also, we are using our own open source rust libraries
https://github.com/NordSecurity/libtelio
https://github.com/NordSecurity/libdrop
Maybe there is there a Debin Rust packaging team as well?
Yes, there is Debian Rust packaging team [1]. Ac
Hello,
On 2023-01-17 15:04, David Kalnischkies wrote:
I would suggest talking to maintainers of similar packages, they can
probably give you more practical advice in this matter.
I maintain a couple of similar header-only packages. Developers
unwilling to provide stable API are a challenge, b
Hi Hilmar,
On 2022-12-19 20:36, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
yesterday I uploaded latexml_0.8.7-1_source.changes to Debian FTP. Until
now I just got the information that the package was received, no reject
or accept.
I requested a package rebuild (#1026239), which was approved, but the
builders did not
Hi Andreas,
On 2022-10-27 12:37, Andreas Tille wrote:
Am Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 12:00:59PM +0300 schrieb Andrius Merkys:
I have just pushed a fix. Please check if that works for you as well.
Hmmm, this results in
uscan info: Newest version of libomp-jonathonl on remote site is
0.0
Hi Andreas,
On 2022-10-27 11:31, Andreas Tille wrote:
Unfortunately its not just omp but the latest commit from the
development branch. Thus I tried gitmode[1] according to the docs:
$ cat debian/watch
version=4
opts="mode=git,gitmode=full,pgpmode=none,pretty=0.0+git%cd.%h" \
https://git
Hello,
Thanks everyone for your answers!
On 2022-08-30 21:39, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 12:00:39PM -0500, Ryan Pavlik wrote:
>> The easiest way to do the tarball cleaning is with Files-Excluded in the
>> copyright file, uscan will involve something (mkorigtargz?) that uses i
Hi Niels,
Thanks for prompt reply.
On 2022-08-30 17:40, Niels Thykier wrote:
> From the description you have provided, I would assume yes with the
> following assumptions:
>
> 1) By "Extract AmberTools" you mean repackage the orig tarball.
Yes, that is what I meant.
> 2) AmberTools consists
Hello,
I am looking into packaging AmberTools [1], suite of tools for molecular
dynamics simulation. AmberTools is GPL, but it is shipped inside a
tarball of a larger piece of software called Amber [2]. To get the
tarball one has to put in their name and institution in a form [2], but
there is no
Hi Mattia,
On 2022-02-27 19:21, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 08:53:26AM +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote:
>> The naming scheme could be adjusted to add '.' before the letter in
>> version string (2.40c -> 2.40.c), but I cannot craft a watch file which
>
Dear Mentors,
I am maintaining package c2x, which has the following versioning scheme:
2.40c >> 2.40b >> 2.40
This is correct order as per 'dpkg --compare-versions'. However, if I
add '+ds' repack suffix (I need to), the order becomes reversed. Thus
'uscan' behaves as expected because it knows h
On 2021-09-24 16:14, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 03:16:34PM +0300, Andrius Merkys wrote:
>> I have created repositories under salsa.debian.org/debian, and later
>> pushed their contents to repositories in another group (I should have
>> transferred instead
Hello,
I have created repositories under salsa.debian.org/debian, and later
pushed their contents to repositories in another group (I should have
transferred instead). Could someone with appropriate privileges remove
them?:
debian/libemf2svg
debian/libuemf
Best,
Andrius
OpenPGP_signature
Des
On 2021-03-25 20:47, Mathias Gibbens wrote:
> Thank you Andrius! I appreciate the time you've taken to sponsor my
> packages.
>
> I've pushed a signed tag to each repository.
>
> As new releases are made, or if there's any feedback from ftpmasters,
> I'll contact you directly.
Thank you Ma
On 2021-03-25 03:07, Mathias Gibbens wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-03-24 at 07:58 +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote:
>> 3. Upstream copyright entry in debian/copyright lacks years. If the
>> upstream do not limit their copyright in years, I usually take the
>> year
>> range spanning
owner 979592 !
owner 985806 !
owner 985807 !
thanks
Hi Mathias,
On 2021-03-24 03:47, Mathias Gibbens wrote:
> retitle 979592 RFS: openrct2/0.3.3+ds-1 [ITP] -- Open-source
> re-implementation of RollerCoaster Tycoon 2
> thanks
>
> I have uploaded a revised version of openrct2 to mentors.d.n:
>
On 2021-03-23 02:08, Mathias Gibbens wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-03-16 at 12:57 +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote:
>> On 2021-03-15 19:28, Mathias Gibbens wrote:
>>>> I have reviewed your packaging, and saw libcurl4-openssl-dev
>>>> among
>>>> the build depende
Hi Mathias,
On 2021-03-15 19:28, Mathias Gibbens wrote:
>> I have reviewed your packaging, and saw libcurl4-openssl-dev among
>> the build dependencies. Do you know what does openrct2 need it for?
>> My concern here is that in-game network access/downloads may
>> interfere with Debian policies.
>
Hi again,
I fail to build the package as of
e6e4103971b570a179ef5a59a709c24b2fcc5d68 on clean sid chroot with the
following error log (only the last lines):
find ./debian -name libopenrct2.a -delete
find ./debian -empty -type d -delete
make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>'
dh_install
dh_install: wa
Hi Mathias,
Thank you for an interesting ITP. It would be nice to have openrct2 in
Debian.
I have reviewed your packaging, and saw libcurl4-openssl-dev among the
build dependencies. Do you know what does openrct2 need it for? My
concern here is that in-game network access/downloads may interfere
Hi Robin,
On 2021-01-29 23:56, Robin Gustafsson wrote:
> Does the possibility of arithmetic overflow on 32-bit systems mean
> that the software is to be considered incompatible with 32-bit
> architectures?
>
> A package I'm working on has some test failures on 32-bit due to
> overflows. I only ma
Hi Andreas,
On 2020-10-15 15:26, Andreas Tille wrote:
> when trying to build paw with gcc / fortran 10 there are some FORTRAN
> errors:
>
>
> ...
> Error: Type mismatch between actual argument at (1) and actual argument at
> (2) (COMPLEX(4)/INTEGER(4)).
> /<>/src/pawlib/comis/code/cs1200.F:138:
Hi Leon,
On 2020-10-02 14:40, Leon Marz wrote:
>* Remove vim-asciidoc (Closes: #954780)
>* Remove asciidoc-base as it is unnecessary
>* Put files from asciidoc-base to asciidoc
>* Remove asciidoc-doc as there are no real docs
So it seems that three binary packages are being droppe
On 2020-08-25 10:48, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:39:50AM +0300, Andrius Merkys wrote:
>> Buildd status page for libdatetime-perl [1] says that on kfreebsd-* its
>> build dependencies are uninstallable, citing the following dependency
>> tree (fo
Hello,
Buildd status page for libdatetime-perl [1] says that on kfreebsd-* its
build dependencies are uninstallable, citing the following dependency
tree (for kfreebsd-amd64, for example):
libdatetime-perl build-depends on:
- libdatetime-locale-perl:kfreebsd-amd64 (>= 1:1.06)
libdatetime-locale-p
Hi Woodrow,
On 2020-06-18 13:02, Woodrow Shen wrote:
> I'm doing NMU for davfs2 and would like to access
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/davfs2 to send a PR to the maintainer.
> Can someone help me? Thanks.
>
> My username on salsa already aligned to "woodrowshen" as NM.
To submit a PR you do
Hi Emmanuel,
On 2020-06-09 22:28, eamanu wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "palettable"
Could you please place your name in Uploaders field, and DPMT as
Maintainer in d/control? See [1] for example.
[1]
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/pycifrw/-/blob/master/debian/co
Hi Paul,
On 2020-04-26 05:58, Paul Wise wrote:
> I think if you just move the existing binary packages to the new
> source package, that would be enough. Just make sure the versions of
> the new binary packages are newer than the versions of the old binary
> packages. IIRC you won't even need to g
Hello,
The upstream seems to have merged sources of freehep-graphicsio-* into a
single tarball. Thus to update libfreehep-graphicsio-*-java binary
packages (currently having their separate source packages) I would have
to split the new tarball myself. Splitting is quite some hassle, and
gives no a
Hi Joachim,
Your package seems to fit well inside Debian GIS Team [1]. You may
contact the team regarding the sponsoring and team maintenance.
[1] https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianGis
Best wishes,
Andrius
Hi Sebastiaan,
On 2020-04-16 09:46, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> The excuses for rdkit show that it's blocked by gcc-10:
>
> https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=rdkit
>
> And the excuses for gcc-10 show autopkgtest regressions:
>
> https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=gcc-10
Thanks
Hello,
schroedinger-coordgenlibs is not migrated although the delay is over
[1]. Is there something I can do about it? This package prevents
migration of other packages.
Best,
Andrius
[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=schroedinger-coordgenlibs
On Fri, 20 Dec 2019, 12:30 Andrey Rahmatullin, wrote:
> Thet testing package is built on i386. If you are no longer building it on
> that arch, you need to file a bug to remove the i386 binary from testing.
>
Thanks for explanation!
Best,
Andrius
Hello,
stringtie [1] is not migrating due to missing build on i386, although this
arch is excluded from the arch list for the package. The delay is over. Is
this transient, or is there a problem?
Cheers,
Andrius
[1] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/stringtie
On 2019-11-18 13:56, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> So it isn't about including the orig.tar but about including the whole
> source package.
> For that you need to pass -s to sbuild.
This worked, thanks a lot!
Best,
Andrius
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 2019-11-18 13:25, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> Do you mean amd64.changes or source.changes?
I mean amd64.changes.
> Does it include the dsc and debian.tar?
Neither as of now. And I need to upload binary packages as well as
original source, as this upload will have to go through NEW.
Best,
And
Hi Andrey,
On 2019-11-18 11:38, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> Until #884428 is fixed it's probably the easiest to just produce the
> source package from gbp after (or before) you checked sbuild builds it
> correctly. The option for that is as usual -sa.
'gbp buildpackage --git-builder=sbuild --debb
Hello,
I am using git-buildpackage + sbuild to build packages. For some of the
uploads, I need to force the inclusion of the original source. What
command line options should I use to do so?
Thanks in advance,
Andrius
On 2019-08-13 08:52, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>
> You can request binNMUs for the affected packages, the release team
> recently did this for all the packages in unstable.
>
> https://release.debian.org/wanna-build.html
Thanks a lot! I will look into it.
Best,
Andrius
Hello,
After the buster release, all my new packages accepted by FTP Masters
become blocked by "Not built on buildd: arch $arch binaries uploaded by
$email" (i.e. [1]). How should I remove this blocker? I know that I can
get around by doing source only upload of -2 releases, but I hope there
is an
Hi Frederic-Emmanuel,
On 2019-07-17 11:40, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
> this software provide a GUI application and a python modules generated via
> swig.
> part of the code is shared between the binary and the modules.
>
> the upstream put the library
>
> _libBornAgainCore.so
> _libBorAgain
prior to the actual package source. As gatb-core is in Debian, there is
no need to build it, its library can readily be taken from system-wide
location. So the patch would be to ignore the 'include (GatbCore)'
instruction in CMakeLists.txt.
Hope this helps,
Andrius
--
Andrius Merkys
Vilni
Hi Adam,
On 2019-05-16 12:49, Adam Borowski wrote:
> Once the package has been taken for NEW, it's out of your reach, and you
> need to ask for a REJECT.
Thanks for advice, I will turn to FTP people.
Best,
Andrius
--
Andrius Merkys
Vilnius University Institute of Biotechnology, Sa
gversion-plugin_1.5.0-1_amd64.changes
dcut rm -f 'gversion-plugin_1.5.0*' -f
libgradle-gversion-plugin-java_1.5.0-1_all.deb
Thanks in advance,
Andrius
--
Andrius Merkys
Vilnius University Institute of Biotechnology, Saulėtekio al. 7, room V325
LT-10257 Vilnius, Lithuania
VirtualBox allows for reverting the system in case one
inadvertently breaks it.
Best,
Andrius
--
Andrius Merkys
Vilnius University Institute of Biotechnology, Saulėtekio al. 7, room V325
LT-10257 Vilnius, Lithuania
2] https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/PythonModulesTeam/HowToJoin
--
Andrius Merkys
Vilnius University Institute of Biotechnology, Saulėtekio al. 7, room V325
LT-10257 Vilnius, Lithuania
Hi Alex,
On 2019-04-25 15:51, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
> have you found a solution?
> I managed to craft the following d/watch:
[snip]
Thanks, I have already managed to put together something very similar,
which also works fine.
Best,
Andrius
--
Andrius Merkys
Vilnius University Instit
solution.
Best wishes,
Andrius
--
Andrius Merkys
Vilnius University Institute of Biotechnology, Saulėtekio al. 7, room V325
LT-10257 Vilnius, Lithuania
.03.12.12.16-1”).
I was going for exactly this upstream version format. Thanks for the
detailed description!
Best wishes,
Andrius
--
Andrius Merkys
Vilnius University Institute of Biotechnology, Saulėtekio al. 7, room V325
LT-10257 Vilnius, Lithuania
HTML excerpt (taken from [1]):
reference-structures.tar.gz2013-03-12
12:16 6.4M
where the "reference-structures.tar.gz" is the tarball I want and
"2013-03-12" is the timestamp.
Thanks in advance,
Andrius
[1] https://www2.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/personal/pemsley/coot/dependencies/
Hi,
On 2019-04-19 16:21, Tong Sun wrote:
> Oh, this is just a hypothetical question -- upstream release a new
> version, and I want to repack/update my package, do I have to log a
> bug in BTS, or it is OK to just update my package without a BTS#, then
> send the RFS request?
No, ITP bug number i
uot;typed netstring")
is already in Debian. What is the difference between python-tnetstring
and python3-tnetstring? Are these packages related/overlap somehow?
Best wishes,
Andrius
[1] https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/PythonModulesTeam
--
Andrius Merkys
Vilnius University Institute of Biote
Thanks,
Andrius
--
Andrius Merkys
Vilnius University Institute of Biotechnology, Saulėtekio al. 7, room V325
LT-10257 Vilnius, Lithuania
would be bumping the soname (or restoring the removed
> names) upstream.
I will check with the upstream.
Thanks,
Andrius
--
Andrius Merkys
Vilnius University Institute of Biotechnology, Saulėtekio al. 7, room V325
LT-10257 Vilnius, Lithuania
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
should I change the SONAME?
Best,
Andrius
--
Andrius Merkys
Vilnius University Institute of Biotechnology, Saulėtekio al. 7, room V325
LT-10257 Vilnius, Lithuania
to summarize here.
Best,
Andrius
--
Andrius Merkys
Vilnius University Institute of Biotechnology, Saulėtekio al. 7, room V325
LT-10257 Vilnius, Lithuania
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ewhere
else? In the latter case, please take into consideration possible
licensing restrictions on its usage.
Let me know should you need any help.
Andrius
--
Andrius Merkys
Vilnius University Institute of Biotechnology, Saulėtekio al. 7, room V325
LT-10257 Vilnius, Lithuania
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ed before the MMB. To start with, I would suggest reading the
introduction to packaging [3], as Andrey has advised.
[3] https://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers
Best wishes,
Andrius
--
Andrius Merkys
Vilnius University Institute of Biotechnology, Saulėtekio al. 7, room V325
LT-10257 Vilnius, Lithuania
(not sure if you are subscribed to notifications there, thus a ping).
While the package seemingly builds and installs fine, there are some
things that need to be fixed to make your package acceptable in Debian.
Best wishes,
Andrius
--
Andrius Merkys
Vilnius University Institute of Biotechnology, S
Andrius Merkys
Vilnius University Institute of Biotechnology, Saulėtekio al. 7, room V325
LT-10257 Vilnius, Lithuania
On 2019-02-09 15:12, Mo Zhou wrote:
> Why did you stopped maintaining this package here?:
> https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/apache-opennlp
Oh, I completely forgot about this. I have now switched from 'merkys-guest' (to
be closed soon) to 'science-team' and pushed
ing and language detection
examples execute successfully after having all binary packages installed, both
using the CLI and Java compiler. Therefore, I assume that core functionality
works as would be expected.
Best wishes,
Andrius
--
Andrius Merkys
Vilnius University Institute of Biotechnol
ipt from
opennlp-distr/src/main/bin/opennlp (opennlp-tools/bin/opennlp does quite the
same, albeit using maven for execution).
Best,
Andrius
--
Andrius Merkys
Vilnius University Institute of Biotechnology, Saulėtekio al. 7, room V325
LT-10257 Vilnius, Lithuania
d. Could you please try building the package once more?
Best wishes,
Andrius
--
Andrius Merkys
Vilnius University Institute of Biotechnology, Saulėtekio al. 7, room V325
LT-10257 Vilnius, Lithuania
Hi Mo Zhou,
thanks a lot for the interest in my RFS. At first glance the FTBFS issue
seems to be related to #920020. I will investigate it further.
Best wishes,
Andrius
[#920020] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=920020
On Sat, 2 Feb 2019, 10:30 Mo Zhou control: tags -1 +morein
net/debian/pool/main/a/antlr4-cpp-runtime/antlr4-cpp-runtime_4.7.2-1.dsc
More information about antlr4-cpp-runtime can be obtained from
https://www.example.com.
Changes since the last upload:
antlr4-cpp-runtime (4.7.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* Initial release (Closes: #918109)
-- Andr
10:30, Andrius Merkys
> wrote:
> > I am preparing a package for apache-opennlp [1]. Building it results in
> six artifacts, one of them,
> org.apache.opennlp:opennlp-morfologik-addon:jar:1.9.0, depends on another
> artifact org.apache.opennlp:opennlp-tools:jar:debian which is b
tps://salsa.debian.org/merkys-guest/apache-opennlp
--
Andrius Merkys
Vilnius University Institute of Biotechnology, Saulėtekio al. 7, room V325
LT-10257 Vilnius, Lithuania
intain the package inside either the Debian Science or Debian Java
teams, whichever seems more appropriate.
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/merkys-guest/apache-opennlp
--
Andrius Merkys
Vilnius University Institute of Biotechnology, Saulėtekio al. 7, room V325
LT-10257 Vilnius, Lithuania
create snapshot after clean install, plus base environment setup (ssh
> key, VBox additions), but no other extra packages. Then, I can restore
> snapshot and see what needs to be installed, and also I can test build on
> almost clean install of system.
--
Andrius Merkys
Vilnius Universi
anks,
Andrius
--
Andrius Merkys
Vilnius University Institute of Biotechnology, Saulėtekio al. 7, room V325
LT-10257 Vilnius, Lithuania
es Spencer", license: BSD.
I have overlooked this. Included now, as well as a bunch of other files.
> 2. The package fails to build:
>
> ! LaTeX Error: File `ulem.sty' not found.
I have missed one of texlive-* packages. Added now.
Would you mind to pull and build it aga
of #886711, thanks for
pointing it out to me. Surprisingly, espresso hasn't received a ping about the
transition or the bug, that's why it took so long for me to find out the reason.
Thanks again,
Andrius
--
Andrius Merkys
Vilnius University Institute of Biotechnology, Saulėtekio al.
vided/replaced by scalapack now. However, scalapack's libraries
have other sonames, what requires adaptation and rebuilding of all packages
depending on blacs-mpi. I have spent quite some time to figure this out when
packaging espresso. Isn't this a bug in scalapack?
Best wishes,
Andrius
Dear Mentors,
I fail to find the formal definitions (regarding API/ABI and files) of
Provides and Replaces fields of d/control, could someone point it out to me
please? In particular, if package A Provides/Replaces B, does that mean
that A MUST have the same API/ABI and files as B?
Many thanks,
A
Hi Andrey,
On 08/30/2018 09:49 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> The maintainer should do that.
thanks for the explanation. I had the same feeling, though.
Best,
Andrius
--
Andrius Merkys
Vilnius University Institute of Biotechnology, Saulėtekio al. 7, room V325
LT-10257 Vilnius, Lithua
ting this out! I was unaware of the new ITP, I will give it a
look.
Best,
Andrius
--
Andrius Merkys
Vilnius University Institute of Biotechnology, Saulėtekio al. 7, room V325
LT-10257 Vilnius, Lithuania
want package's source on salsa.d.org. Should I create a new repo on
salsa.d.org and import 'pegtl' there with 'gbp import-dsc'?
2) The package is not maintained by any team (cc'ing Muri Nicanor, the
maintainer of 'pegtl'). Am I allowed to even touch it?
Best
sevier.com/sd/article/S0927025614005187
[2]
https://scholar.google.lt/scholar?as_ylo=2018&hl=en&as_sdt=2005&sciodt=0,5&cites=8672732540737765863&scipsc=
[3] https://salsa.debian.org/merkys-guest/pslibrary
<https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/wannier90>
--
Andrius Me
On 07/18/2018 02:00 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> Well, it's only for this version, as in the future you won't have
> non-repacked tarballs in the repo?
True indeed, it's just for this version. For new upstream releases uscan will
work as expected.
Thanks,
Andrius
--
A
t-orig or if you need a manual
> (1) uscan + (2) 'gbp import-orig --pristine-tar your-new-tarball'.
Exactly, 'gbp import-orig --uscan' does not accept '--force'. Thus I'll
probably have to use 'uscan' + 'gbp import'. I expected a single
s//,repack"' to d/watch. However,
'gbp import-orig --pristine-tar --uscan' does not do anything telling "package
is up to date, nothing to do". How should I proceed?
Many thanks,
Andrius
[1] https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debmake-doc/ch05.en.html#dfsg
--
Andriu
not in the Mentors (due to #901025). The packaging is done in
Salsa repository at https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/wannier90
and can be reviewed there.
The package could be maintained in either Debian Science or DebiChem team.
Many thanks,
Andrius
--
Andrius Merkys
Vilnius University In
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Hello,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "reentry".
* Package name: reentry
Version : 1.2.1a2
Upstream Author : Rico Haeuselmann
* URL : https://pypi.org/project/reentry/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang
Best,
Andrius
--
Andrius Merkys
Vilnius University Institute of Biotechnology, Saulėtekio al. 7, room V325
LT-10257 Vilnius, Lithuania
> Please let me know if you think the package is ready. Then I'll check
> it again :-)
I suppose it's ready now. By the way, the package is already in NEW queue --
should I close this bug? Or is it possible to update a package already in the
NEW?
Many thanks for help!
Andrius
-
5. I'd suggest you install the library in the multiarch directory.
> for example /usr/lib/$(dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_MULTIARCH)
Done.
> 6. tests: your autopkgtest testsuite failed:
I will look into this. It is possible that I invoke the Python tests
incorrectly.
Thanks again!
And
retitle 883840 RFS: spglib/1.10.3-1 [ITP] -- C library for crystal symmetry
determination
thanks
I have updated the package as per new upstream patch release of "spglib".
Andrius
--
Andrius Merkys
Vilnius University Institute of Biotechnology, Saulėtekio al. 7, room V325
LT-102
retitle 883840 RFS: spglib/1.10.2-1 [ITP] -- C library for crystal
symmetry determination
thanks
I have updated the package as per new upstream patch release of "spglib".
Andrius
--
Andrius Merkys
PhD student at Vilnius University Institute of Biotechnology, Saulėtekio al. 7,
ro
RL:
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/spglib.git
Alternatively, a package can be GIT cloned from the packaging repository by:
git clone git://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/spglib.git
Best regards,
Andrius Merkys
.
Sincerely,
Andrius Merkys
--
Andrius Merkys
PhD student at Vilnius University Institute of Biotechnology, Saulėtekio al. 7,
room V325
LT-10257 Vilnius, Lithuania
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
