(small) bug in aptitude?
>
> * Why is my package considered "broken"? All dependencies are
> correct. Should it explicitly conflict with exim4? (I think this is
> pointless since postfix already does.)
Try "dselect", it gives you a more detailed view of conflicts and the
packages around them.
- Bruce
c
ln: creating symbolic link `ip_unix.c' to `ip6_unix.c': File exists
make[5]: *** [onceenv] Error 1
make[5]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/alpine-0.8/imap/c-client'
- Bruce
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e two packages should be able to coexist, if possible, at
least until alpine stops being an "alpha" product.
So, maybe hold off on replacing "pine" for now.
- Bruce
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
d shipping "pico" stuff. There may be a
role where nano provides an Alternative to pico.
- Bruce
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hat the package will never be a part of Debian?
>
> [0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2006/10/msg00207.html
"never" to probably too strong; you may only need to wait until an app
which uses libvrb enters Debian or an app in Debian starts using it.
- Bruce
to have something to do
with /usr/share/menu/cdd-menu from cdd-common and perhaps menu-xdg, not
sure what the problem is though.
- Bruce
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue August 22 2006 15:47, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> On 8/23/06, Bruce Sass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon August 21 2006 17:37, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > > Last week-end I was told by a DD that the 4-clause BSD licence
> > > was non-free... Do you ha
nk to render it ineffective..
- Bruce
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rib and non-free are the mechanisms Debian uses to make
such code available in spite of those handicaps.
Note: the ideology at play here is not one of separation, but rather
one of inclusion.
- Bruce
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 03:32:42PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 08:47:44AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > Since bzr (and other arch derivates) have the benefit of NEVER for
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 08:47:44AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Since bzr (and other arch derivates) have the benefit of NEVER forgeting
> which changesets are in a tree, I prefer them over any other distributed
> system. If anyone knows of other distributed system that saw the ligh
more
than barely keep up with what going on; and generally, still too big
and scary a project for me
- Bruce
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, skaller wrote:
On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 11:22 -0600, Bruce Sass wrote:
<...>
Can dpkg/apt/etc. be tweaked to automatically Provides: no-* ?
Two methods, one is not tenable:
(a) X conflicts with no-X implicitly
no-X doesn't really "conflicts"
udev (>= 0.060-1)".
>
> An elegant solution ;-)
>
> > I guess this would behave as expected, but I think that having one more
> > package only for this would be quite insane!
>
> Especially because others would pick up the idea...
Can dpkg/apt/etc. be tweaked to a
short term, I'm glad the precedent which would be
set by discarding a name/path with a long and useful history is seen
as worthy of argument.
- Bruce
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 05:24:47PM -0600, Bruce Sass wrote:
Isn't this simply a case of,`too bad cogito guys, that filename is
already taken.'
I suppose other things being equal it'd make sense to give the older
package priority.
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 05:24:47PM -0600, Bruce Sass wrote:
> Isn't this simply a case of,`too bad cogito guys, that filename is
> already taken.'
I suppose other things being equal it'd make sense to give the older
package priority.
Though git (the new one) seems som
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 06:05:53PM -0500, Michael Janssen wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Jun 2005, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > Why not just take the git developers at their word, and assume that the
> > intersection between users of git and of GNU Interactive Tools is likely
> >
y are wrong. MC is a toy, GIT is useful, imo.
Should I just make my cogito package Conflict with the GNU Interactive
Tools git package?
Isn't this simply a case of,`too bad cogito guys, that filename is
already taken.'
- Bruce
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 04:51:12PM -0500, Michael Janssen wrote:
> > Le Jeudi 02 Juin 2005 21:25, Sebastian Kuzminsky a écrit :
> > > Should I just make my cogito package Conflict with the GNU Interactive
> > > Tools git package?
...
> My suggestion is to rename the binary in the cogito package to
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Bruce Sass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.04.03.0122 +0200]:
I would go with a) because it is more likely to result in consistency
between systems and across time; although b), with its bit more work
for the admin, would be more satisfyi
On Sat, 2 Apr 2005, Sven Mueller wrote:
Bruce Sass wrote on 02/04/2005 01:02:
Ya, ok, it is still a significant amount of work, but it would be Debian's
work and not that of the upstream authors.
Now, what does make more sense?
a) Investing a huge amount of time and thought into cleanly man
- any desired user friendliness (graphs, charts,
stats, etc.) could be added via optional plugins.
Ya, ok, it is still a significant amount of work, but it would be
Debian's work and not that of the upstream authors.
- Bruce
[1] universal, i.e., a feature of Debian rather than a feature
maining
packaging needed won't be a lot of work, and I'll be excited to work on
it with whoever is interested!
--Bruce Fields
maining
packaging needed won't be a lot of work, and I'll be excited to work on
it with whoever is interested!
--Bruce Fields
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm one of the developers on the Linux NFSv4 project, and am starting to
think about getting some of our userland support into Debian. See,
for example, libnfsidmap, available from
http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/nfsv4/linux/
Anyone interested?
--Bruce Fields
I'm one of the developers on the Linux NFSv4 project, and am starting to
think about getting some of our userland support into Debian. See,
for example, libnfsidmap, available from
http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/nfsv4/linux/
Anyone interested?
--Bruce Fields
--
To UNSUBS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
r", but I guess I am too
impatient to wait more than a day. :-} )
Cheers,
Bruce
;mentor", but I guess I am too
impatient to wait more than a day. :-} )
Cheers,
Bruce
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
The instructions on:
http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/developers-reference\
/ch-new-maintainer.html
was too confusing. Especially since I am behind firewalls and
running OSR5, not Linux let alone Debian. I forwarded on my
request for maintainership for my AutoGen package, san
ld be compelled" to
upgrade old systems?
Does this upgrade require user intervention?
- if not then maybe do it in the background, over time?
- Bruce
--
On Sun, 30 Jan 2000, Alexander Koch wrote:
> On Sun, 30 January 2000 14:03:33 +1100, Brian May wrote:
> > >>>>>
the source at all.
I suspect the dupload processor wants to see the .diff and .tar.gz files.
If necessary, you can upload the .diff to master and build the package
there, so that you don't have this hassle with your modem.
Thanks
Bruce
34 matches
Mail list logo
