On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 03:32:42PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 08:47:44AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > > Since bzr (and other arch derivates) have the benefit of NEVER forgeting > > > which changesets are in a tree, I prefer them over any other distributed > > > system. If anyone knows of other distributed system that saw the light > > > and > > > implemented this, please let me know. > > > > What's an example of a VCS that does forget changesets? I'm not sure I > > understand the requirement. > > I never said it was a requirement. > > Examples are: all VCSes that do not track every changeset by an unique > identifier which is not changed even when the changeset is migrated across > repositories, and all VCSes that lose track of component changesets across > merges.
Have you looked at mercurial or git? I think they both do that. Monotone too, I assume. --b. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
