On Tue December 5 2006 15:16, Asheesh Laroia wrote: > I'm working on packaging the Alpine mail client, an Apache License > 2.0 release of the popular PINE mail and news reader. I'm very happy > to see this great (both powerful and friendly) MUA be Free. > > Upstream bundles an editor called PICO, originally the PIne COmposer. > I wanted to ask for comments on the way I handled making two binary > packages: basically I do "make install" with CURDIR set to alpine, > and I just "mv" the pico binary and man page out into the CURDIR for > alpine-pico. The "pico" binary and man page are separated because > "nano" also has a pico man page and binary; that way, only > alpine-pico conflicts with nano.
I don't think alpine-pico should conflict with nano, nano needs to stop Conflicting with, Replacing, and shipping "pico" stuff. There may be a role where nano provides an Alternative to pico. - Bruce -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
