On 11.01.2017 00:37, Taylor Kline wrote:
> I uploaded a patch for Python3 about ~15 hours ago, but it's not
> showing up on https://ftp-master.debian.org/deferred.html
>
> Attempting to upload again does indicate that it should have
> successfully uploaded:
> --
On 28.09.2012 03:53, Paul Wise wrote:
> Has the FSF been asked to switch to plain GFDL so that we can move the
> GCC docs to main? They did that for the autoconf documentation
> recently.
yes. but you may want to try again.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
wit
Samuel, thanks for doing this. However, I'm trying to get gcc-4.5 removed from
unstable soonish, so I would like to see this for gcc-4.6 (and 4.7 as found in
experimental). Could you do this? Nikita, could you sponsor the package?
Matthias
On 25.01.2012 19:05, Samuel Bronson wrote:
Dear GC
On 19.12.2010 10:16, Stephen Kitt wrote:
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:45:06 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 11.12.2010 17:40, Stephen Kitt wrote:
I imagine this could mean that the gcj and gnats builds don't use the
patches in the gcc-4.x-source package, and only use the tarball which
won
On 11.12.2010 17:40, Stephen Kitt wrote:
On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 17:28:10 +1030, Ron wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 10:29:24PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 23.11.2010 12:49, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
debian-gcc is a bit specific to the native libc based toolchains and
cross-toolchains using
[CC ing Marcin]
On 23.11.2010 12:49, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
On 23 November 2010 12:17, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Hi again,
[out of order for convenience]
Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
=) can you sponsor our work in the future?
Only if I become DD. I have not applied yet, so you will probably
nee
e because there's a conflict
> there to force them both to be upgraded at the same time.
>
> Matthias (Klose), is this right? If so somebody should tell aj.
tix8.1 can transition to testing, if python2.1, 2.2 and 2.3 make the
transition.
When building a source package, where the binary packages get their
own version numbers, dpkg-genchanges does not get the correct version
number. If you look at the package python-rng, then it get's its own
version number 1.1-11.1. It is correctly built as
dh_gencontrol -ppython-rng -u-v1.1-11.1
tony mancill writes:
> On Fri, 30 Jul 1999, David Coe wrote:
> Having made the mistake of applying the patches to the source tree and
> then having to jump through major hoops everytime a new upstream version
> came out, I think that you are on the right track. I have a directory in
> the roo
Peter S Galbraith writes:
>
> I'm running slink, but figure I must update my compiler
> environment and update my potato packages.
I am not sure, which slink/potato cocktail you use. My recipy follows
> In particular, I have a g++ packages called gri.
> I notice that there a several g++ dev
Just a stupid question: Is a newly installed shared libc6 used for new
processes, when the system is not rebooted?
ld.so(8) reads:
BUGS
Currently ld.so has no means of unloading and searching
for compatible or newer version of libraries.
So I come to the conclusion that I have
Is it allowed to use /usr/doc/, if no binary packages
with the exists? I don't see anything in the policy,
which explicitely forbids this.
Jens Ritter writes:
>
> As I constantly run into problem when my packages are build on non
> i386, I would like to ask if this is ok:
>
> I have got a multi binary package (kbackup) which splits into
>
> kbackup (Architecture: all --- a shell script)
> kbackup-multibuf (any --- a C progr
[cc to debian-devel; I would like to get comments as well]
Aaron Van Couwenberghe writes:
> Hi all
>
> Is there a standard way for dpkg-genshlibdeps (I think that's its name) to
> be able to locate dependencies that live in debian/tmp besides
> superextending LD_LIBRARY_PATH?
>
> IE a pac
Stephane Bortzmeyer writes:
> libc 6 libc6 (>= 2.0.7t)
>
> in it, but it gives now:
>
> Depends: libc6 (>= 2.0.7t), libc6 (>= 2.0.7u-6)
I think you have some binaries linked to libraries which have the
libc6 (>= 2.0.7u-6) dependency itself in it's shlibs file.
You could look at /va
Aaron Van Couwenberghe writes:
> Just a quick q --
>
> in debian/rules, what is the preferred method of installing a
> libfoo.so.x.y (with syms libfoo.so.x and libfoo.so) to debian/tmp? Are the
> symlinks to be moved? Are they to be absolute? Or dows ldconfig provide the
> links?
Use d
Mark Brown writes:
> I'm trying to package up the compiler TenDRA compilers (see
> http://alph.dra.hmg.gb/TenDRA/ for more information). I've just about
> got everything working - the only problem that I can see at the minute
> is that it requires a couple of object files which are part of gcc
Richard Braakman writes:
> Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > can someone give me a hint how I can efficient test if a certain directory
> > is empty in the postrm (shell script)?
>
> If you only want to know if it's empty because you want to remove it,
> then there's a very simple solution:
>
>
Gregory T. Norris writes:
> I just wanted to let people know that I've sent Doug Ledford an
> unofficial set of installation-disk images for hamm, including version
> 5.1.2 of the aic7xxx driver, which he's agreed to make available at the
> aic7xxx ftp-site (ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/aic/). The
I would like to know on which given package other packages depend.
(yes, this has been posted somewhere last month, but I cannot find
this)
Thanks.
Some comments on the debhelper disadvantages:
Manoj Srivastava writes:
> Disadvantages:
> i) One becomes dependent on them, and does not know what is going
>on
try to run the helper programs with -v. You get a pretty good insight
what's happening (although this may change, when Joey i
Could somebody point me to a machine running Debian alpha, on which I
could try compiling the egcs package (no root access required).
Thanks, Matthias
I built two shared libraries libscore and libpml. dh_shlibdeps calls
dpkg-shlibdeps and produces some warnings, which result in missing
shlibs control files.
$ dpkg-shlibdeps -Tdebian/substvars debian/tmp/usr/lib/libpml.so.1
debian/tmp/usr/lib/libscore.so.1
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: unable to fi
Currently I build a binary package A from source package X; now I want
to build binary packages A and B from source package Y (which contains
the contents of package X), without changing the functionality in
binary package A. Is it ok to leave package X alone or do I have to
orphan it?
Thanks, Mat
Marcelo E. Magallon writes:
> On Mon, Jun 01, 1998 at 11:52:18PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>
> I've made a shot at packaging WindowMaker 0.15.0 with a mixture of this.
> Configuration is basically located in /etc/GNUstep and /etc/X11/WindowMaker.
> Data files are located in /usr/share/WindowMak
I have the following problem. Version 1 of package X has a directory
/usr/lib/xy with files in it. The next version 2 puts these files in
another directory and wants to replace /usr/lib/xy with a symbolic
link to the new directory. This works, when I uninstall version 1 and
then install version 2.
Joey Hess writes:
> Adam P. Harris wrote:
> > I have. Some packages require specific versions of supporting
> > packages. Since we don't have source depends,
> > /usr/doc//buildinfo.Debian files are a useful thing.
>
> Buildinfo files are in binaryt packages. What does that have to do with
> sou
Sverker Wiberg writes:
> Shaleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Is there an easy way to determine header dependencies? Anyone header
> > could include many others. Or do I have to open up each header and
> > track down which package it is included in?
>
> Here's a piece of plumbing I put toget
tkdesk requires BLT. in frozen, only BLT2.3 exists, which is
compatible to tcl7.6/tk4.2 only. Last weekend I uploaded blt8.0-unoff, a
BLT version compatible to tcl8.0/tk8.0 to unstable (not frozen). Since
tkdesk seems to profit from the byte compiled tcl code, it would be
nice to have this in ham
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 1998 at 03:07:41PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > - build the objc-compiler from a newer egcs snapshot release and
> > include it in the release.
> >
> > Now I have some problems with the versioning scheme. The current
Since I don't get any comments/answers on debian-devel I ask on this
list again.
hamm doesn't provide a working objc compiler; the egcs objc support
doesn't work at all. To have a working objc compiler in hamm I
made the following.
- split off the objc compiler from the egcs-g++ package and defin
Despite the fact that I often need help with packaging as well ...
It's very difficult to install a consistant kde (98MMDD), even if
previous kde versions (BETA2) are not installed:
- there is no set of packages, which are all made from the same
snapshot.
- Many packages have equal dependencies
32 matches
Mail list logo
