Re: buildd is not building my package.

Carlo Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 10:28:14AM -0500, Carlo Segre wrote: > So again: [EMAIL PROTECTED], please for the sake of users of > (at least) sparc, ia64, i386 -- auto build the package libcwd. Now done. > If there is a problem and this cannot be done - MAIL me

Re: Rebuilding the whole archive.

"Joe Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The whole thing is a bit confusing. > The alioth Buildd-tools project releases only sbuild, and schroot, > but their SVN repository also contains buildd, and a (the?) wanna-build > script. > > The only other repository I have found is: > http://svn.cyberhqz

Re: Rebuilding the whole archive.

"Joe Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If you do choose to use wanna-build, I think the proper source location is: > is svn://svn.debian.org/buildd-tools/trunk/buildd/ > with the wsvn interface at: > http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/buildd-tools/trunk/buildd/ > > That appears to house both wanna-build

Re: Please unblock audacious/1.2.2-3

Rogério Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Would it be possible to have audacious so that we can have a decent > non-gtk 1 (and light) music player for various formats in etch? > > I have been using audacious pulled from unstable and I would love to see > it in etch, since it doesn't depend on ext

Re: help on t-p-u ? Re: gpr in etch is useless: hint 0.12deb ? upload in t-p-u ?

A Mennucc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Steve Langasek ha scritto: >> I think in conclusion I would prefer t-p-u for this. > I tried it ; > I uploaded a package (using dput) ; > the first line in debian/changelog was > gpr (0.11deb.etch1) testing-proposed-update; urgency=low It's -update*s*. Ma

Re: Tone-of-voice used by sponsors

"Muammar Wadih El Khatib Rodriguez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In the other hand I don't think he has something to change, I really > do appreciate all the work he does and how he does. He imposes a high > quality standard when he sponsors a package. Erm. Fixing the number of whitespaces in scr

Re: what is debian way to modify Makefile.frag ?

Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hubert Chan wrote: >> You can use something like dpatch or quilt. Or just modify >> Makefile.frag in the root source directory and let dpkg-buildpackage >> include the patch into the diff.gz file. > ...but using a patch management system is strongly rec

Re: Need a sponsor

Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Danny van der Meeren wrote: >> I'm searching for a sponsor for the amd64 binary package of glimpse > You know that Debian has autobuilders? You (resp. your sponsor) need to > upload source + binaries for one architecture, the rest is done > automatically

Re: bug got stuck in "Fixed and Pending"? How comes?

Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Harald Dunkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: >>> The upload that fixed the bug, 20041028-9, contained these fields: >>> | Maintainer: Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: ITP vexim

Daniel Knabl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The main target in postinst, when someone initially installs the > software, is "configure", and in postrm, when someone purges it, it is > "purge". For these two targets I found examples by looking at some > other packages (phpmyadmin, album, ...) that do

Re: sponsor needed (after review)

Daniel Knabl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Am Sun, 22 Jan 2006 17:55:55 +0100 schrieb Daniel Knabl > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> as i use this piece of software already on my own host, i would like >> to provide it to any other users. > Now it seems that most of the work is finished. [0] No, the packa

Re: ITP vexim

Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 00:16:25 +0100, Daniel Knabl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: [..] >> cat /usr/share/doc/vexim/setup/mysql.sql |\ >> sed s/@@PASS@@/$dc_vexim_pass/g |\ [...] > I am not sure whether maintainer scripts are allowed to rely on > informatio

Re: lintian warning native-package-with-dash-version

Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 11:00:47PM -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote: >> Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: >>>> You might consider using the -v 0.2.2.1 option in dh_make to >>>> convert this to a compl

Re: lintian warning native-package-with-dash-version

Carlo Segre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote: >> Q1) Where am I doing wrong? How can I get rid of this error? > > I think that this has to do with the -1 in the name of the original > tarball. No. Please read the Debian Policy: Only the part of the vers

Re: Packaging Barcode Writer in Pure PostScript

Terry Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Would people please examine the package and tell me what problems > exist. You can view the files at > http://www.terryburton.co.uk/barcodewriter/files/debiansrc The debian/rules is very bloated, please remove everything which is not needed and not mandat

Re: howto deal with upstream authors not responding?

Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 01:41:58PM +0200, Bastian Venthur wrote: >> The problem is: >> On kde-look[1], everaldo put his icons under LGPL, but he did not put a copy >> of this license in his tarball. > While a copy of the license gives more legal certainty, I

Re: dh_clean -k -i

Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > All of the binary packages that should be created are architecture > independent (debian/control says "Architecture: any" for them, which I > assume is the same thing). No, Architecture: any means that the package is architecture-dependent. You shoul

Re: How do I specify a particular version intelligently?

"Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I just had a grave bug filed against my releaseforge package. > I have traced the fault to an issue with the version of > pyqt-tools. If the package is compiled with the version > of pyqt-tools in sarge (3.13), it needs to run against > python-qt3

Re: RFS: volume.app - A dockapp enabling esay control of the volume level

Carlos Parra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Package name : volume.app [...] > This program it's quite simple, and have been orphaned for a while... i > use it frequently, that's the reason i would like to adopt it. Well, there are *3* bugs about this. In your changelog, you only close one (which i

Re: Sources with missing dependencies

Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > P.S.: If only I knew a way to use pbuilder with svn-buildpackage. :( I haven't used svn-buildpackage for some time, but AFAIR, svn-buildpackage --svn-builder=pdebuild works. Marc -- $_=')(hBCdzVnS})3..0}_$;//::niam/s~=)]3[))_$(rellac(=_$({pam(esrever

Re: [bug #279790] O: libgtk-perl -- I might be interested...

Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, I'm not a Debian developer but have a good experience of Debian > packaging : > > - I'm the maintainer of the unofficial apache-lingerd package [1]. > - I've made an ITP on a Linux C++ game [2]. > - I've made an ITP on a backup tool [3]. > > I us

Re: [bug #279790] O: libgtk-perl -- I might be interested...

Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, I'm not a Debian developer but have a good experience of Debian > packaging : > > - I'm the maintainer of the unofficial apache-lingerd package [1]. > - I've made an ITP on a Linux C++ game [2]. > - I've made an ITP on a backup tool [3]. > > I us

Re: RFS: mp3gain -- Lossless mp3 normalizer with statistical analysis

"Bruno Barrera C." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, 2004-04-04 at 18:24, Stefan Fritsch wrote: >> On Sun, 4 Apr 2004, Bruno Barrera C. wrote: >> > - I Think you must read [0](Looking at the Architecture field) >> Upstream supports only i386 and I somehow doubt that the source is 64bit >> clean

Re: RFS: mp3gain -- Lossless mp3 normalizer with statistical analysis

"Bruno Barrera C." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, 2004-04-04 at 18:24, Stefan Fritsch wrote: >> On Sun, 4 Apr 2004, Bruno Barrera C. wrote: >> > - I Think you must read [0](Looking at the Architecture field) >> Upstream supports only i386 and I somehow doubt that the source is 64bit >> clean

Re: About Package Creation... (sarge vs sid)

Benjamin Cutler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Just how important is it that a package be created on a box running > sid? Very important. > I'm currently running sarge, and would like to package a program myself > instead of waiting for somebody else, but I'm not sure I want to start > running si

Re: About Package Creation... (sarge vs sid)

Benjamin Cutler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Just how important is it that a package be created on a box running > sid? Very important. > I'm currently running sarge, and would like to package a program myself > instead of waiting for somebody else, but I'm not sure I want to start > running si

Re: RFS: xerces -- or -- request for NMU

Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am interested in possibly co-maintaining the xerces packages or in > taking them over. Ivo Timmermans, the current maintainer of the > xerces packages, indicated on [1]debian-devel that he is "looking for > people interested in working on the xerces p

Re: RFS: xerces -- or -- request for NMU

Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am interested in possibly co-maintaining the xerces packages or in > taking them over. Ivo Timmermans, the current maintainer of the > xerces packages, indicated on [1]debian-devel that he is "looking for > people interested in working on the xerces p

Re: cpufreqd braindamaged versions

Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 02:05:25AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: >> Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > I packaged cpufreqd version 1.1-rc1 and called it 1.1-rc-1, now 1.1 is >> > out..

Re: cpufreqd braindamaged versions

Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 02:05:25AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: >> Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > I packaged cpufreqd version 1.1-rc1 and called it 1.1-rc-1, now 1.1 is >> > out..

Re: cpufreqd braindamaged versions

Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I packaged cpufreqd version 1.1-rc1 and called it 1.1-rc-1, now 1.1 is > out... [...] > the less ugly debian version name I found is *1.1.final-1*. Is it ok or > has anybody a better suggestion? Read the fu^Wfine policy and use an epoch. Marc -- $_=')

Re: cpufreqd braindamaged versions

Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I packaged cpufreqd version 1.1-rc1 and called it 1.1-rc-1, now 1.1 is > out... [...] > the less ugly debian version name I found is *1.1.final-1*. Is it ok or > has anybody a better suggestion? Read the fu^Wfine policy and use an epoch. Marc -- $_=')

Looking for a sponsor for FireHOL

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hi, A week ago, i created a package for FireHOL (). I've seen that there is an "old" ITP (>100 days old, no activity), mailed the sender of the ITP six days ago and got no response. I've written a manpage for firehol (there was none b