, Lonnie Sauter wrote:
> Oliver-
>
> I have no problems with you updating the sysutils package if you wish.
> If you would like to have the package we could arrange it. I have been
> looking to find something different to work on in any case.
Okay, I think I would prefer this scenar
, Lonnie Sauter wrote:
> Oliver-
>
> I have no problems with you updating the sysutils package if you wish.
> If you would like to have the package we could arrange it. I have been
> looking to find something different to work on in any case.
Okay, I think I would prefer this scenar
7;t you contact the sysutils maintainer and ask him about
> co-maintaining it or something?
Quote from Lonnie Sauter:
--
I have no problems with you making memtester an ITP. We probably should
just break up 'sysutils' as it does not really follow the Debian of
7;t you contact the sysutils maintainer and ask him about
> co-maintaining it or something?
Quote from Lonnie Sauter:
--
I have no problems with you making memtester an ITP. We probably should
just break up 'sysutils' as it does not really follow the Debian of
I do not understand why my package was rejected. I look in the
directory /REJECT and this is what I found:
[ 23:08:16 : master : /home/Debian/ftp/private/project/Incoming/REJECT
]
(67) $ more sysutils_1.3.6.1_i386.reason
Rejected:
sysutils_1.3.6.1_i386.changes: Unknown Format `'
Could som
gt; distribution. I've already debianized the package, so the only work
> necessary should be compiling and uploading. I'll be releasing a new
> version in a few days.
>
> Thanks,
> Aaron Lehmann
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a sub
6 matches
Mail list logo
