Oliver- I have no problems with you updating the sysutils package if you wish. If you would like to have the package we could arrange it. I have been looking to find something different to work on in any case.
Thanks, Lon On Wed, 2002-08-07 at 12:06, Oliver Kurth wrote: On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 06:59:23PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > is no excuse for packaging this seperately IMNSHO. > > Furthermore, libncurses5 is Priority: required, so I don't really buy > your argument about cutting down dependencies either. > > Why don't you contact the sysutils maintainer and ask him about > co-maintaining it or something? Quote from Lonnie Sauter: -- I have no problems with you making memtester an ITP. We probably should just break up 'sysutils' as it does not really follow the Debian of today. -- I will Cc him, maybe he also has something to say. Greetings, Oliver -- http://zork.net/~nick/srom/ -- Lonnie Sauter, Ph.D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part